Jury Selection Begins in Child Abuse Case Against Mister Rodriguez in Bexar County

The afternoon session of the 187th District Court on June 4, 2025, presided over by Judge Stephanie Boyd, focused on the jury selection process for the case of State vs. Rodriguez. The proceedings began with Judge Boyd addressing potential jurors, emphasizing the importance of impartiality and understanding the legal framework surrounding the charges against the defendant.

Judge Boyd outlined the three counts against Rodriguez: continuous sexual abuse of a child under 14, indecency with a child by sexual contact, and another count of indecency with a child by sexual contact. She clarified that the jury's role is to consider the case based solely on evidence presented during the trial, and not on any preconceived notions or personal experiences.

The judge explained the concept of an indictment, stating that it is not evidence of guilt but merely a formal accusation that allows the case to proceed to trial. She stressed that potential jurors should not hold Rodriguez's indictment against him and that everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Throughout the selection process, Judge Boyd engaged with jurors to ensure they understood their responsibilities, including the right to remain silent and the burden of proof resting with the state. She highlighted that the prosecution must prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and if they fail to do so, the defendant must be found not guilty.

The judge also addressed the potential discomfort jurors might feel regarding the nature of the charges, urging them to focus on their ability to remain fair and impartial. She reiterated that personal feelings should not influence their judgment and that they must base their decisions solely on the evidence presented in court.

As the session progressed, jurors were asked if they could uphold the presumption of innocence and whether they would be able to deliberate fairly, regardless of their personal experiences. Judge Boyd concluded the session by confirming that if selected, jurors would not be responsible for determining the punishment if Rodriguez were found guilty, as he had opted for the court to decide that aspect.

The proceedings underscored the judicial system's commitment to a fair trial, emphasizing the importance of juror impartiality in cases involving serious allegations. The next steps in the trial process will involve presenting evidence and testimonies to establish the facts of the case.