McKeesport Board faces backlash over cancellation of East End Academy and YES program

In a tense atmosphere at the McKeesport Area School District's recent board meeting, community members voiced their frustrations over the elimination of key educational programs, sparking a heated debate about the future of student support in the district.

Monica LaRathonda, a youth engagement specialist from the YES program at McKeesport High School, expressed her dismay as she announced her impending departure due to the program's discontinuation. "Some of the students in our district really needed those programs," she lamented, highlighting the positive impact the YES program had on reducing conflicts among students. LaRathonda's heartfelt plea underscored the emotional toll of losing resources that had proven beneficial in fostering a safer school environment.

The meeting took a critical turn when Stephanie Graham raised concerns about the East End Academy, questioning the board's decision to vote on its closure without adequate communication to the community. "What are their options?" she asked, emphasizing the uncertainty faced by students who had thrived in the program. Graham pointed out the financial implications of potentially sending students to more expensive alternatives, such as Summit Academy, which could cost the district upwards of $65,000 per student.

In response, board members defended their decisions by citing financial constraints and low enrollment numbers, revealing that the East End Academy had only 11 students attending regularly. They argued that the cost per student was unsustainable, prompting the need for budgetary reevaluation. However, this rationale did little to quell the concerns of parents and community members, who felt blindsided by the lack of transparency surrounding the board's actions.

As the meeting progressed, the atmosphere grew increasingly charged, with attendees expressing their dissatisfaction with the board's handling of these critical issues. Bobby Smith, a local resident, voiced her discontent, stating, "You're doing a very good job of summing up the incompetence of the school director and the school board."

The discussions at this meeting reflect a broader concern within the McKeesport community about the future of educational programs and the board's commitment to student welfare. As the district navigates financial challenges, the voices of concerned parents and educators serve as a reminder of the vital role these programs play in shaping the lives of students. The outcome of these discussions will undoubtedly have lasting implications for the community and its educational landscape.