[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6213416,"mediaKeyId","3676705-ac204f9a2acb26f2b8f581c668aba87b","parentId",3676705,"title","Commission remands Selmore Road rezoning back to Planning & Zoning for infrastructure review with MoDOT input","audioSeconds",2752,"startMs",2981315,"endMs",5733460,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3676705-ac204f9a2acb26f2b8f581c668aba87b&start=2981&end=5733","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3676705-ac204f9a2acb26f2b8f581c668aba87b/thumbnail_2981315.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6213416/Christian-County/Missouri/Commission-remands-Selmore-Road-rezoning-back-to-Planning-Zoning-for-infrastructure-review-with-MoDOT-input","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6213416-d9be6396b30c5ad1cc6473ff90bcc2bc/orig.mp4?Expires=1775406432&Signature=eUhvZALnYiFu0mSIXry2AR~4bjauSS2rjCrTeyXE0JUomU1XR8a6nEqCXi79m~VeLJmajZtvDd194THtxzL8FbCF2KyzskZzCpgrUJ-y4mSQPExwdlldPgQWOrXTko~mHlzmomdO~uScPJLwVlB4ezvnA-Q0zAqJXBDT7osUtnH6J6azUbe1veoC197g7BGzixjefX5Y2-XfSIm~XU-H6BRikrP55NTeez4P3guH6EAp3GW2egJ-vnjTnCnF5UJxcu~mhHHJOOt7eD5xzq-c-KpC0Fya~vHW0cdMd43AX89fmsR-x8Z4KdVMMkKLdgr~uNr-S2uuaqb-FNBRo1W~OA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Christian County, MO","date","2025-06-05T14:29:55Z","article","The Christian County Commission voted to remand rezoning case 2025-0088 — a request to change about 5.7 acres at 6795 Selmore Road from AR (agricultural/residence) to C2 (general commercial) — back to the Planning and Zoning Commission so staff and the applicant can gather additional information, including input from MoDOT.

Planning staff summarized the case and public comment from a May 27 hearing, saying the applicant proposed a commercial use (applicant letters described storage for emergency supplies) but the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended denial because of “existing infrastructure deficiencies in this area.” Scott, the planning presenter, noted the property has frontage on Selmore Road, close to Highway 65, but said the stretch of Selmore in front of the site is narrow and that additional commercial development could require driveway upgrades or turn lanes handled by the road owner.

Several residents told commissioners they worry about safety on the narrow stretch of Selmore Road, flood-prone approaches, and the ability of larger trucks to pass. One resident said a pond and local sinkholes contribute to flooding in the area. A planning commissioner and others described the road width in places as roughly 14–17 feet.

At the hearing commissioners discussed options for moving forward and emphasized the distinction between rezoning (a land-use designation) and subsequent site-specific approvals. Several commissioners noted the rezoning question is not limited to the applicant’s stated use because “anything in C1 and anything in C2 is allowed,” and cautioned that approving a rezoning could allow uses with much higher traffic than the applicant’s stated plan.

Commissioners recommended the applicant consult MoDOT (or the appropriate road authority) about existing right-of-way, any planned improvements, and what road or access upgrades would be required for commercial development. Commissioners then voted to remand the application to Planning and Zoning so that body could consider any new information and provide an updated recommendation before the matter returns to the commission.

Planning staff and commissioners said they will assist the applicant in contacting the relevant highway contacts and SimCOG as needed; no rezoning was approved at the June 5 meeting.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Christian County Commission - 2025-06-05","oneSentenceSummary","The commission remanded a rezoning request (case 2025-0088) for a 5.7-acre Selmore Road parcel to the Planning and Zoning Commission after staff and residents raised concerns about narrow road widths, stormwater and access; commissioners asked applicants to seek input from MoDOT and return with further information.","taxTitle","Christian County, Missouri","taxId",52859,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6213420,"Commission approves minor amendment to zoning code to align groundwater overlay process with state law",456,2403020,2859115,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3676705-ac204f9a2acb26f2b8f581c668aba87b&start=2403&end=2859","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3676705-ac204f9a2acb26f2b8f581c668aba87b/thumbnail_2403020.jpg","/articles/6213420/Christian-County/Missouri/Commission-approves-minor-amendment-to-zoning-code-to-align-groundwater-overlay-process-with-state-law","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6213420-06423121dc18ba0025500c2918aad384/orig.mp4?Expires=1775406432&Signature=ALZjFstNdpbkspUSNlniwLxPROMlKdL24rN7T5CtQFC~dVPdLaj6zib2wM2atesrAkP-5jhqIn0nrv7h4amCe-DKS4XBDWDSTcVZy37szMZyLFcNFPeeFRZGjxyoCJokWPnFRPuiNIvyMS2DG~cdFoMI9GRX376NVu9~PrJqpChMZErfJUagTfIt4eoZctpBCa35ImeVp~FUNWrkJyhO7wGPEr88EZmIOqeY-xEGIHUINnfyuLXGUMN8GfNDgGLCAT9Sgl6LVgWzg~yReYjBC0BUIIOpKgKcW-ety6a3JbWwIcOVlCHw4z0U06S6cLcFWh22oJkv94i16nKXbabJaw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","County planning staff presented a narrowly focused amendment to Article 47.5 of Christian County’s zoning regulations to align the GRPA (groundwater recharge projection area) process with state statutory procedures.

Planning staff (Miss Todd) explained the change removes a separate notice requirement and adds language that “as with any other amendment to the zoning regulations, the procedure for adopting a new GRPA shall follow the process delineated in article 49, sections 3 and 4, which are established and created under the authority of sections 64.211 through 64.295 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri.”

Miss Todd told the commission the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the amendment and unanimously recommended approval. Commissioners discussed consistency with the City of Ozark’s approach and whether the county should continue to monitor municipal code changes; staff said the revised text keeps procedures consistent while allowing municipalities to identify areas for higher protections case-by-case.

After discussion the commission voted to approve the changes to Article 47.5; staff said the order will be signed and recorded and the updated regulation will be posted. No changes to substantive technical standards were adopted; the amendment is procedural, clarifying that GRPA boundaries are added by the same amendment steps as other zoning amendments.","Christian County commissioners approved a minor amendment to Article 47.5 of the county zoning regulations so that adding a groundwater recharge protection area (GRPA) follows the same amendment procedure as other zoning changes and cites RSMo authority for the process.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6213425,"County auditor warns commissioners they may be personally liable for two unsigned change orders; commissioners rescind orders and direct budget amendment",83,901334,984850,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3676705-ac204f9a2acb26f2b8f581c668aba87b&start=901&end=984","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3676705-ac204f9a2acb26f2b8f581c668aba87b/thumbnail_901334.jpg","/articles/6213425/Christian-County/Missouri/County-auditor-warns-commissioners-they-may-be-personally-liable-for-two-unsigned-change-orders-commissioners-rescind-orders-and-direct-budget-amendment","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6213425-ebf3d9eade579bb0383b621438cbf79d/orig.mp4?Expires=1775406432&Signature=DiKbEht2Vaux~DrXWOFMWnb4SizvXULK9mkCtbOrmPNrp7IFu3kNZC8Up-~oCzCoXwH2PFwaELVOO1kRrXkDLN4y8ZZJi7nvvtFjVH3CFKapfAqXNSNAMRTxf8zM46VTLyVSkXgAeDbX6zJveLTEZxoW~cn9D-kesXJkdn77BW-7l2Gd1m1mKaQ1gyaYiGjwzeEieCSHBQGgImsYWUdIQSAuPEC~0tnTdTq1wy5GLrAqOJw9O0rB2d3rmC61H8J79vGAp96iLhjrD4nDmrsutt7g-B7yVzeAJevEIe1~ypmW8SrO2goUCGjM0VRZRPJNYRed22rVFFfaiswmyeVpDQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","County Auditor Miss Amy told the Christian County Commission that two contract change orders for a county campus project lack the required pre-certification and therefore are not legally binding on the county.

“Unless the accounting officer certifies the purchase first, the officer making the purchase is liable personally and on his bond,” Miss Amy told commissioners, citing the Revised Statutes of Missouri. She said the county therefore “is right now on the hook personally for a hundred and $4,723.36 under the change orders that were approved and signed.”

Amy explained the legal test she used: a contract imposing a financial obligation on the county must be in writing, must have sufficient appropriation remaining, must have a sufficient fund balance, and must bear the accounting officer’s certification. She said the change orders she reviewed did not meet all four criteria and that her office cannot retroactively certify obligations.

Auditor Amy laid out a cure path: commissioners could rescind the change orders, make a budget amendment available to the public for 10 days, and then vote to amend the budget if additional unanticipated revenue is confirmed. Only after an approved amendment could staff ask vendors to reissue change orders for commission approval.

Commission discussion focused on process reforms to prevent similar problems. Commissioners said they had assumed projects would come to the auditor before commission approval and asked staff to create a checklist or form requiring auditor certification before items reach the commission. Purchasing staff volunteered to draft a change-order form that shows the original purchase order amount, change order amounts, description, and required approvals including department head and auditor signatures.

County staff and commissioners agreed on short-term remedies: rescind the two change orders now and proceed with a proposed budget amendment process (laid on the table for 10 days) so the commission can later vote on the amendment. The commission voted in favor of rescinding the change orders and instructed staff to lay a proposed amendment on the table for public review for 10 days before any payment or reauthorization.

Commissioners also discussed use of “unencumbering” some funds for work not yet performed so that critical work can continue while the formal amendment is prepared.

No payments were approved at the June 5 meeting for the disputed change orders; the auditor said invoices she has received under those purchases “is not payable by the taxpayers, only the personal funds of the commissioners” unless the budget amendment is completed and the change orders are reissued and approved.","Christian County Auditor told the commission that two change orders executed with effective dates before available appropriations fail statutory certification and therefore are not binding on the county; the commission voted to rescind the two change orders and begin a 10-day public budget-amendment process.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6213429,"Christian County officials report storm damage to dozens of roads, estimate roughly $200,000 in county repairs",171,238335,409560,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3676705-ac204f9a2acb26f2b8f581c668aba87b&start=238&end=409","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3676705-ac204f9a2acb26f2b8f581c668aba87b/thumbnail_238335.jpg","/articles/6213429/Christian-County/Missouri/Christian-County-officials-report-storm-damage-to-dozens-of-roads-estimate-roughly-200000-in-county-repairs","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6213429-7c4ab71374157e1b892ce3cba09ed67d/orig.mp4?Expires=1775406432&Signature=aJw-M5ZUEuRhRF0D-a5gyuhf1WwSOU2-zcniuKXnQE-IQKjMpmURDyJmCgdH~7zD~KmFB8vW564opD-2mmZvAJwqNSwNi5rKx6nYj1Ibpb79rh4wluWpHXVrjfIDybb5ZgWzOg8tYTSm7BqymJDsAKpN1CpvNk2mgoSP~QY6~WRImjWkcefrkWSzroAVx9kNqIJe6cpuZQhrDK6NQEBRZz152ToWEXdQih4Tr~63s2cKhgfnyRs8FXl7Fv6Dycglj0DVDKHTqBfYytRE7igcBiqx4hbJQtOsHIEmJgAhiIMzurnevF8dm25XQqIwVcVYwvPTj1PGuQP-v119fy3s6A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Presiding Commissioner Lamar and county highway staff updated the Christian County Commission on damage from storms that began May 24, saying crews closed 47 locations and reopened nearly all by the following week.

Highway Administrator Miss Fields told commissioners, “yesterday, we hit $100,000 that we've spent so far, towards this cleanup,” and said county crews were progressing from emergency response to more permanent repairs. “We anticipate the total project cost to be … $215,000 just for the Christian County Highway Department,” she said during the June 5 meeting.

The update framed the immediate work and the reimbursement process. Fields said the county began emergency response on May 24 and that most roads were passable within days; one low-water crossing (Wilson Road) remained closed, which staff said is often underwater. Fields described damaged approaches, trees down, and places where trucks and outside contractors were brought in to clear large debris.

Commissioners asked whether repairs would come from planned paving funds. Fields said she would request use of the county’s emergency fund to pay roughly $120,000 of the department’s portion and that the county will report about $200,000 in costs to FEMA for potential reimbursement — an amount that includes county labor and equipment. She added that eligible costs submitted to FEMA could later be reclaimed.

Commissioners and staff discussed federal- and state-level thresholds for disaster reimbursement; Fields said she was still confirming whether the county and surrounding jurisdictions meet the state threshold for a statewide declaration. “There's a county threshold and then there's a state threshold,” she said, noting uncertainty whether surrounding counties’ damage would push the region over the state threshold.

Commission members pressed for public communication about how residents should report downed trees or water over roads; commissioners emphasized that the public’s phone calls and the county’s use of USGS gauges helped crews prioritize responses.

The commission did not take formal action on specific project contracts at the June 5 meeting but was told staff will seek use of emergency funds at a subsequent agenda item to avoid removing roads from the summer paving list.

Commissioners said they appreciated the highway crews’ work getting most closures cleared within days and asked staff to continue coordinating with emergency management on damage tallies needed for state and FEMA reviews.

The county will pursue a combination of internal emergency funds and possible federal reimbursement; officials did not set final dates for permanent repairs but described continuing asphalt and armoring work over the next few weeks.","County highway officials told the Christian County Commission that storms on May 24 closed 47 locations and caused widespread spot damage; crews have reopened all but one route and estimate about $200,000–$215,000 in county-level repairs, with FEMA and state reimbursement under review.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Commission remands Selmore Road rezoning back to Planning & Zoning for infrastructure review with MoDOT input

Commission approves minor amendment to zoning code to align groundwater overlay process with state law

County auditor warns commissioners they may be personally liable for two unsigned change orders; commissioners rescind orders and direct budget amendment

Christian County officials report storm damage to dozens of roads, estimate roughly $200,000 in county repairs