[{"_1":2,"_98":-5,"_99":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,74,86],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},"mediaId",6544393,"mediaKeyId","3686386-17f393ef8111761dd6b81bb126e144f3","parentId",3686386,"title","Planning Commission recommends City Council certify SEIR and approve Temecula Valley Hospital master‑plan amendments","audioSeconds",3390,"startMs",2398000,"endMs",5788000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3686386-17f393ef8111761dd6b81bb126e144f3&start=2398&end=5788","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3686386-17f393ef8111761dd6b81bb126e144f3/thumbnail_2398000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6544393/Temecula/Riverside-County/California/Planning-Commission-recommends-City-Council-certify-SEIR-and-approve-Temecula-Valley-Hospital-masterplan-amendments","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6544393-6ace5a35a156cdd33bfaf9f37ce08e83/orig.mp4?Expires=1775461541&Signature=bTqv9fLjBfq0ua6OVkeEUSwxtTonm9GK0Jz8sM7q1fSL18gl3RD5sY6Agn-k1fOBYdVAek~jizPAQIFzCU9JkBEmUBDGWaQ3g3RTv~qLcTZW~aQ2Y-DC-BXdift1o5bPpQy8~T6OWakAiKE2gslQztvyl7hLwfIej7-ZufutN6IWVXy2U3RzV9f~nbg1joOyNxBpoalQgU46e~4XthSbLA1P4fLNMl7tee1hm9cPHwXIBLujjP~MN-lRqt4FVQ-SlUxlrrgyk7-Tr5S-kJikuISBGgsQU2NAjn5aPfe3mp2EHL1Es~TOjd5YXWmV9mfwlexw-Ym70l~fofLxOjbMzQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-06-05T21:17:21Z","article","The Temecula Planning Commission on June 4 voted 5-0 to recommend the City Council certify the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) and approve a set of amendments and modifications to the Temecula Valley Hospital (TVH) master plan, including an amendment to the Temecula Hospital Planned Development Overlay (PDO‑9), modifications to previously approved development plans and conditional-use permits, and removal of an earlier condition of approval (COA No. 27).

Staff and the applicant said the applications do not propose immediate building architecture or construction drawings; rather, they update the campus master plan and allow future development to occur in phases. Scott Cooper of the Community Development Department presented the package, describing three phases that would add hospital towers (phase 2: a 25,000-square-foot second tower with 40 beds; phase 3: a third tower of similar scale and supporting medical-office buildings), an expanded emergency department, an approximately 12,600-square-foot central utility plant, additional medical-office buildings, and expanded parking (including an option for a multi-level parking structure in a later phase). Cooper said the proposed amendments also would increase the allowable floor-area ratio to 0.55 and lot coverage to 55% within the PDO to accommodate the campus buildout.

The project includes relocating the hospital helipad to the southwest corner of a proposed future parking structure. Cooper said the relocation would not change the number of monthly helicopter trips (about six per month) and that the revised flight path would shift to an east–west route down Temecula Parkway to minimize noise impacts to nearby residences. He said FAA and Caltrans Division of Aeronautics approvals would be required before final helipad relocation and flight-path implementation.

The applicant clarified that a behavioral‑health hospital use is not part of the current applications and would require separate entitlements, environmental review and discretionary approval should TVH pursue that use in the future. CEO Hong Min and COO Brian Visser spoke for TVH and said the expansion aims to increase emergency‑department capacity, add beds and expand outpatient/physician office space to meet community demand.

The SEIR identifies air quality, greenhouse gas emissions and transportation (vehicle-miles traveled) as areas where significant impacts could remain after mitigation. Eric Ruby, the city’s environmental consultant, explained VMT methodology and reported the project’s VMT at 38.4 miles per employee per day compared with the city’s significance threshold of 29.4 VMT. He said staff identified a menu of mitigation measures—employee-focused trip-reduction programs, transit-pass subsidies (mitigation measure 3.13‑02), and enhanced bicycle and end-of-trip facilities—but that even with those measures the VMT impact could not be reduced below the significance threshold. Because of the remaining significant VMT impact, the SEIR includes a statement of overriding considerations addressing public benefits and the unavoidable transportation impact.

Members of the public voiced concerns about existing and potential noise, light spillover, traffic, and impacts to adjacent properties. Long-time neighborhood speaker Brad Storman said he had experienced instances in which patients exited the emergency department and walked into his backyard and asked for stronger mitigation for noise, light and “central utility plant” impacts. The applicant and staff responded that the central utility plant would be a ground‑level building (not an elevated parking structure) and that project mitigations require demonstration of compliance with the city’s residential noise standards before operation.

Commissioners asked technical questions about mitigation and monitoring. Commissioner Gary Watts said he wanted more clarity on how VMT reductions and the transit‑pass mitigation were calculated; the SEIR consultant described the calculation approach and noted a regional VMT bank being developed by WRCOG as an upcoming resource. Commissioners also asked that lighting, landscaping and screening for the campus and future parking structure adhere to the city’s development standards to limit impacts on adjacent residences.

Planning staff recommended that the commission adopt resolutions recommending City Council certification of the SEIR, adoption of the statement of overriding considerations where required, and approval of the amendments to PDO‑9 and related planning applications. Commissioner Gary Watts moved to accept staff recommendations; Mark Watson seconded. The motion passed 5-0.

The Planning Commission’s action is a recommendation; final approvals and SEIR certification would be taken by the City Council. The SEIR identifies both mitigation measures required before operation of specific facilities and several unavoidable impacts (notably VMT/greenhouse‑gas related) for which staff prepared a statement of overriding considerations.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Temecula Planning Commission Meeting - June 4, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Temecula Planning Commission on June 4 voted 5-0 to recommend City Council certify the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report and approve amendments to the Temecula Valley Hospital master plan (PDO‑9) and related entitlements.","taxTitle","Temecula, Riverside County, California","taxId",4198,"location","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":75,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":76,"_41":77,"_43":78,"_45":79,"_47":80,"_49":81,"_51":82,"_53":83,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":84,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":85,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6544398,"Planning Commission approves Type 21 alcohol permit for 88 Ranch Marketplace",1073,1317000,2390000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3686386-17f393ef8111761dd6b81bb126e144f3&start=1317&end=2390","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3686386-17f393ef8111761dd6b81bb126e144f3/thumbnail_1317000.jpg","/articles/6544398/Temecula/Riverside-County/California/Planning-Commission-approves-Type-21-alcohol-permit-for-88-Ranch-Marketplace","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6544398-1792fe7871580aaee6b32e748f31adf8/orig.mp4?Expires=1775461541&Signature=op6hqn2yvrI4BHeCmCYmtlwLapG66jF74hJE4KpqMSryv2CdqLNsyWiHwPgkbhKOWqN75viciLdulYeT5ARoyoqirE-xZWXpIZrlT4OZiGZ8ctr8hEoBAR4ZOc13ZiLdv5RwXzROHxzOtD1-XL6G7PPQ~nS2gHVuRmg2BMW4O0QjZNZ3cx2QXMFvaX09uLrv70N0Mz-VEekFXLrn1BIrk7LWSKj3yu3dEs1xTLwJf3Il2akELEbkk0JGWP5a1YjGFoe8EXpuCzt083ECqGaDigIhsEiO-u4Ki5~NMTMQDts1Ek4zNb7fcIbhvyycUPONX9vEKbVY4NUSHJ60ExHUUA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Temecula Planning Commission on June 4 voted 5-0 to approve a Planning Application (PA24-0506) recommending a Public Convenience or Necessity finding for a Type 21 off-sale general alcohol license for 88 Ranch Marketplace at 27473 Ynez Road in the Tower Plaza Shopping Center.

Planning staff said the specialty grocery would dedicate about 108 square feet to alcohol sales—less than 1% of a 37,000-square-foot store—and would sell beer, wine and distilled spirits as an incidental product. Staff recommended approval and determined the application exempt from CEQA under Class 1 (existing facilities), and staff reported no formal protests had been received.

“Patrons under 21 are permitted on the premises,” staff noted while explaining the Type 21 license allows incidental sale of distilled spirits in a specialty grocery. Staff also reported the location sits inside a census tract that ABC (Alcoholic Beverage Control) considers overconcentrated for off-sale licenses; the applicant must therefore demonstrate the public convenience or necessity standard when ABC makes an overconcentration determination.

Applicant representatives said the store owner, Danny Tran, operates 88 Ranch Market as a long‑standing specialty Asian grocery and already sells beer and wine under a Type 20 license. Attorney Steve Rawlings, appearing for the applicant, said the owner and staff use standard loss‑prevention measures, a security-camera system, and employee training to prevent sales to minors. Rawlings said the owner also uses a card scanner for ID checks and trains cashiers on responsible service.

Commissioners asked about prior ABC violations (staff reported none), security and camera systems (applicant described a comprehensive security system with monitoring), and timing for employee alcohol‑service training. Applicant said training typically occurs at hire and agreed to ensure training is completed promptly rather than waiting 60 days.

Commissioner Fernando Solis moved to approve the staff recommendation; Mark Watson seconded. The motion passed 5-0.

The commission’s action is a recommendation to the city council and to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control processes required for license issuance. Conditions of approval were provided to and accepted by the applicant.","The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of a Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) finding for a Type 21 off-sale general license at 88 Ranch Marketplace (27473 Ynez Road). Staff found the project exempt under CEQA Class 1.",{"_33":87,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":88,"_41":89,"_43":90,"_45":91,"_47":92,"_49":93,"_51":94,"_53":95,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":96,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":97,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6544402,"Planning Commission backs annual amendments to Temecula municipal code",1050,236000,1286000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3686386-17f393ef8111761dd6b81bb126e144f3&start=236&end=1286","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3686386-17f393ef8111761dd6b81bb126e144f3/thumbnail_236000.jpg","/articles/6544402/Temecula/Riverside-County/California/Planning-Commission-backs-annual-amendments-to-Temecula-municipal-code","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6544402-664de7754ecf117ca833ebc215e6d1f0/orig.mp4?Expires=1775461541&Signature=jiIh6skm7QBpjKL7dZMhOTKKNGhvB92J00HUBiTq84yGO4bBw3l85jN1yC6gA9PO9TcPgvt6n-Uq4KPMeBJU7xYbxkWvmK3zyK7ALZqU9dQps3VwQUwG6s9cuQSwYTKv0CbAL3TLuygA5GuJsgNwiVzSFeGkhpJTY5PgZ3TOBhvqQOVC4wLca24vnf-2pGQIANaZp9KVFlAcrqoRPvlB98O1JMY1g458Xx2aq-87IppdhSOBfqoc3Ms~LPuWrFYRWmuGFBGcXx2tHh8BsmpbWYEgQHkitMbVl3XzOL-~R~1UmNnSWBhNMBBHWlR0OhHVJxIJSUbR2Umhai66UFklfw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Temecula Planning Commission voted 5-0 on June 4 to recommend the City Council adopt an ordinance amending Titles 5, 8, 16 and 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code as part of the city’s annual Title 17 code maintenance package.

The proposed ordinance would amend business-license provisions in Title 5, shorten the city’s nuisance cost-recovery waiting period in Title 8, correct a driveway-width typo in Title 16, and make a series of clarifications and new standards in Title 17 zoning regulations. Planning staff recommended approval and found the ordinance exempt from environmental review under CEQA section 15061(b)(3).

“This will be our annual Title 17 code maintenance,” Planning Analyst Katie Garcia said in her presentation. Garcia outlined a dozen separate amendments in Title 17 and smaller changes to Titles 5, 8 and 16. Among the proposed changes she described: allowing the city to issue a Temecula business license before a required federal or other agency permit is issued; reducing the waiting period before the city can recover nuisance-abatement costs from six months to two months; and correcting a driveway-width standard for flag lots.

The Title 17 changes include requirements and clarifications that staff said reflect current practice or address issues the city has seen. Garcia said the home-occupation rule would codify an existing practice limiting client-based businesses (for example, tutors or one-on-one hairstylists) to “one-on-one nonconsecutive appointments only” to keep residential zones residential. She said accessory structures would be clarified as single-story, and the code would explicitly add “shed” to accessory-structure definitions with a three-foot setback. The package also adds bicycle parking requirements for multi-tenant residential developments (one bike space per five units or 10% of total parking, whichever is greater), codifies a requirement for sports and recreational training facilities to complete parking analyses, and prohibits exposed raceways on signs.

Other technical changes include an editorial correction to the Class 4 entertainment last-call hour (to 11:29:59) and a new design/ security requirement for energy-storage enclosures (locking mechanisms or similar anti-dumping/security features). The proposal would also amend definitions (for example, clarifying “personal service shops,” defining salvage/impound/wrecking yards, specifying vending-machine placement as indoor-only, and clarifying that storage sheds may have electrical but no plumbing).

Commissioners asked staff to confirm grandfathering and enforcement details. Garcia said existing vending machines and other previously approved uses would be treated as legal nonconforming if they were approved with a development plan; the new indoor-only vending requirement would apply to new machines. On the business-license change and home-occupation enforcement, Garcia said applicants typically describe operations on their statements of operations and the city enforces those conditions via the business-license permit.

Commissioner Gary Watts moved to accept staff’s recommendation; Fernando Solis seconded. The motion passed unanimously, 5-0.

The changes now go to the City Council for final action, with staff recommending the council adopt the ordinance and find the project exempt under CEQA section 15061(b)(3).","The Temecula Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend City Council adopt annual code maintenance changes to Titles 5, 8, 16 and 17, updating business-license rules, nuisance-cost recovery, accessory-structure definitions, bike parking and other zoning clarifications.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Planning Commission recommends City Council certify SEIR and approve Temecula Valley Hospital master‑plan amendments

Planning Commission approves Type 21 alcohol permit for 88 Ranch Marketplace

Planning Commission backs annual amendments to Temecula municipal code