[{"_1":2,"_123":-5,"_124":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,111],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6211204,"mediaKeyId","3699314-f07f24dc93a19d4bebf6d75829b28be7","parentId",3699314,"title","DRB approves remodel for new restaurant at 4242 N. Scottsdale Road after design change to patio","audioSeconds",514,"startMs",2656000,"endMs",3170000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3699314-f07f24dc93a19d4bebf6d75829b28be7&start=2656&end=3170","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3699314-f07f24dc93a19d4bebf6d75829b28be7/thumbnail_2656000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6211204/Scottsdale/Maricopa-County/Arizona/DRB-approves-remodel-for-new-restaurant-at-4242-N-Scottsdale-Road-after-design-change-to-patio","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6211204-4fa8ef5be859079c99c3175acf8e7f82/orig.mp4?Expires=1771195578&Signature=H6DeUSj5RbB0kEDlSc3gAK0VDTSE1GYmeWwTq8Kvg~O7ZxZ6iNd4wSzPEqynnPRgv02xkQXuzDeU3OnNb35NV0lp9Y0xRdDacsdQqSyz492zs0ahe51Tdmd0ei2HgSzpyq5NSsMNsIoqG84Ne3Uc1goYhxeGOVMPcQJL31pp7xo2rpZlQH56TppUAb-UTupdtFu8rLcFwMAgfygyuyJL1SNY6kQHtFskIhJv8dWzKzG2~-b9TQor7T00EPLMHw8HItQiKbzBve67Ka6r-362ajuJgmS07Og9mlrcDsOoRpHf73iHcpVtRqLoWPtzBaQv~VkcihBax3bOYEfx-SQaWQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","City of Scottsdale, AZ","date","2025-06-06T09:00:41Z","article","The Development Review Board approved case 37DR2024, a remodel and patio conversion for a new restaurant at 4242 N. Scottsdale Road, after the applicant revised the patio massing to address concerns raised by the adjacent restaurant and its patrons.

Greg, current planning principal planner, summarized the site and the history: the application repurposes existing buildings for restaurant use and was continued at the May 15 hearing so the applicant could respond to concerns from the neighboring property to the south. Staff said multiple emails were included in the staff report and that the primary objection had been the scale and proximity of the patio enclosure to the neighbor’s outdoor seating.

Architect Artie Vigil described the solution reached with the neighbor: a “recess at the southeast corner of the patio that basically creates a notch that allows for the people, the patrons on the patio for an Olga Patron just to not feel like they're so close to that wall.” (Transcript used the neighbor restaurant name variably; staff repeatedly referenced the southern neighbor as the adjacent restaurant and its patrons.) The applicant also said the patio will have assembly occupancy for restaurant use and multiple exits complying with fire egress; table counts will be determined during interior design. The applicant said it does not plan amplified live music on the patio and expects only ambient background music.

Staff also addressed parking: the project met overall parking requirements subject to a minor adjustment. Staff said an original overage of bike parking credits was adjusted, resulting in a “1.6 base deficit” that the applicant must resolve before construction plan submittal; staff described that as a minor fix they will require as a stipulation. During voting, Commissioner Gonzales voted no; the motion carried 6‑1: Vice Mayor DeBoschis — yes; Vice Chair Brand — yes; Commissioner Gonzales — no; Board member Peazer — yes; Board member Fekih — yes; Board member Mason — yes; Board member Robinson — yes.

Ending: Staff recorded that the bike‑parking/parking credit adjustment must be resolved prior to construction plan submittal; final occupancy, table counts and signage will be handled in subsequent submittals or deferred submittals as required by code.

","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Development Review Board - June 5, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Development Review Board approved case 37DR2024, a remodel and patio conversion for a new restaurant at 4242 N. Scottsdale Road, after the applicant revised patio massing to create a recessed corner addressing concerns from the adjacent restaurant; the board approved the case 6‑1.","taxTitle","Scottsdale, Maricopa County, Arizona","taxId",2563,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6211209,"DRB approves second airpark hangar; board asks staff coordination on gray tones and soffit option",354,2350000,2704000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3699314-f07f24dc93a19d4bebf6d75829b28be7&start=2350&end=2704","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3699314-f07f24dc93a19d4bebf6d75829b28be7/thumbnail_2350000.jpg","/articles/6211209/Scottsdale/Maricopa-County/Arizona/DRB-approves-second-airpark-hangar-board-asks-staff-coordination-on-gray-tones-and-soffit-option","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6211209-65da8305cf36ec458f08cf978cbd8399/orig.mp4?Expires=1771195578&Signature=nxVY90vCgLE55p8Wn4eWVrHtbo1nnmpFqyYyufA4PH4RKvMoSPn0sdIKNxtPTHefgm67ivIdGibLUDwhxksmxM9URdM3D9q6zPE9ozYaAnLlzrZD7JAhbQft5li9-Jl-0N73PSz-Q829eYE4T3Pm79J1jWkwg6YyWEWV5H0K9WOCcwlkOiw-UZNOtHlBuof6UaBH6a0I6EDvg-w8F0djZFVq6IDHN4Y8RVfxtbGzVq3XSTRaDz0CLrmCDAZ9wLRk-dUQa~bmwDabh2RZqS-rO5KLxcRmn5k5GQCxu6VwY1YbgJEeQIAitwbC34V4BeZZ9LkSpKEWvUj7UdSrovxvQQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Development Review Board approved case 36DR2024 — a hangar and office building at the Scottsdale airpark — after the applicant described a palette of GFRC rain screen panels, tilt‑cast concrete panels and other exterior materials. The board voted 7‑0, adding a condition that the applicant coordinate with staff on gray‑tone distinctions and consider a wood‑toned soffit over entry areas.

Applicant Jim Larson said the project’s material boards were not present in the hearing room but characterized the GFRC rain screen and tilt concrete panels as warmer than the greys shown in renderings. He told the board “we can do anything there” regarding a non‑gray soffit and said the client had not yet specified soffit materials in detail. Board members asked for a warmer accent to break up a predominantly gray palette; one board member suggested a faux wood‑tone soffit and the applicant replied there was “no objection at all.”

A motion to approve the case per staff recommended stipulations, with the additional requirement that the applicant work with staff to make sure the correct gray tone distinction is applied and consider adding a wood‑toned soffit, passed unanimously. The vote was recorded as yes by the seven sitting board members.

Ending: Staff will confirm final material samples and soffit treatment with the applicant before permit issuance.

","The Development Review Board approved case 36DR2024, a hangar/office project with GFRC rain screen and tilt panels, adding a stipulation that the applicant work with staff to ensure proper gray‑tone distinction and consider a wood‑toned soffit to add warmth.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6211214,"DRB approves San Alberto office; board asks for tougher stucco base near sidewalk",499,1686000,2185000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3699314-f07f24dc93a19d4bebf6d75829b28be7&start=1686&end=2185","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3699314-f07f24dc93a19d4bebf6d75829b28be7/thumbnail_1686000.jpg","/articles/6211214/Scottsdale/Maricopa-County/Arizona/DRB-approves-San-Alberto-office-board-asks-for-tougher-stucco-base-near-sidewalk","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6211214-78a781b8593a6e5febf68a81bb4241e9/orig.mp4?Expires=1771195578&Signature=gG1xRGrxjLPTHydMHX6eg12LGIezRGxvkUlXE~KTBwsRUXvaqo7tLnnRImDj59I6iA-08YXQo9liwmkuvdaDZ~S9pxil6qmPMswEd15BmLXKFRX08NmdFPDZ9fQujBRz9lwS9k7vYiTTW~ydnnCIeohHk136qksXE~PS3-qP7dn~OySlWLAQNQKB~H53ITqxI4VIqKP~KjtwxkQtfybMCkh6toSDsToqWT1IApYnjqp5Ey8aMjoCjCV9VOSxMQ6ebx6pzQeehcp~dU9kSOZWJHDAo4-sr-lvrdJD8gZxkyT4Jl6DlsYWgxo-TUBl18n7hMzbLLfwYw1yUKwudk65jg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Development Review Board approved case 25DR2024, a proposed office and ancillary building in the San Alberto/Hayden Road area, subject to staff‑recommended stipulations and an additional condition requiring a higher‑reinforcement stucco treatment or other durable base material for the first 24 inches of the facade adjacent to the sidewalk.

Chris Zimmer, senior planner, introduced the application and explained revisions to an awning and that the applicant had provided material boards. The applicant’s architect, Randy Hazlett of RKA Architects, described exterior finishes including Nichiha panels (two‑by‑four panel application), smooth sand finish stucco and a “modern” three‑coat stucco system. During questioning, board members expressed concern about durability of the stucco down to grade where direct pedestrian contact may occur. The applicant acknowledged the building is wood framed and said the team could increase reinforcement in the mesh/base to make the finish more durable.

Board member Fekih moved to approve the case per staff recommended stipulations and added the requirement that the applicant “work with staff to add a higher reinforcement, stucco material for the bottom 24 inches of the sidewalk adjacent facade on property.” The motion was seconded and passed 7‑0: Vice Mayor DeBoschis — yes; Vice Chair Brand — yes; Commissioner Gonzales — yes; Board member Peazer — yes; Board member Fekih — yes; Board member Mason — yes; Board member Robinson — yes.

Ending: The added stipulation requires verification of the upgraded stucco or alternate durable base prior to permit/plan submittal and will be confirmed by staff during plan review.

","The Development Review Board approved case 25DR2024, a small office and ancillary building on San Alberto, with a stipulation that the applicant work with staff to use a higher‑reinforcement stucco or other more durable finish for the bottom 24 inches of facade adjacent to the sidewalk.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6211219,"DRB approves Flexjet hangar at Scottsdale Airport with stipulation on gray‑tone contrast",363,676000,1039000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3699314-f07f24dc93a19d4bebf6d75829b28be7&start=676&end=1039","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3699314-f07f24dc93a19d4bebf6d75829b28be7/thumbnail_676000.jpg","/articles/6211219/Scottsdale/Maricopa-County/Arizona/DRB-approves-Flexjet-hangar-at-Scottsdale-Airport-with-stipulation-on-graytone-contrast","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6211219-abf9af7669aee8a1647a8ea96f4d195e/orig.mp4?Expires=1771195578&Signature=Np-N~eZrg7iULbrJ6DYHOTa4Qw0Sxfr4JGrxABHk8U8WA~v2EodOS4gPaVm-pehIg-t19JNpxWenb32TrU4oBvcVZWqieRKZYjfnMfTf2Kw3vmXTCg9yNu69hkZTN0PvE-8~LExyo3dxy3BWAVv39gx9QnodaaR1Jel5uICU2rzGgic~MEexo9b6JdgqW0cBY92FdKYCwy114H4ULusn2fl5XWP1X9zgtiaDV~IzFLMUc8ipzz3P1uJ0hO~tGCESpxhnPZyiQaZJy1x4yZI5R2ZyntxxELsKVeVd3HYBI7gLBTDtPO40CoxLiUK4HsGM5xriavzH8nurewTNbfUYEw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Scottsdale Development Review Board voted 7‑0 to approve case 11DR2024, a new hangar and terminal building for Flexjet at the Scottsdale Airport, contingent on staff‑recommended stipulations and an additional condition that the applicant work with staff to increase contrast between similar gray tones on the exterior.

City planner Jesus presented materials and perspectives and said the applicant’s material boards were en route. The applicant described primary exterior finishes as a pre‑insulated metal panel system for the hangar and an ACM/Alucobond‑type composite for terminal walls. An applicant representative said, “the bulk of the building is this, metal panel material” and that the wall panels are a “pewter color.” He also said there is a granite base applied “for the first 32 inches of the building” and that deck and ground pavers are different textures.

Vice chair Brand and other board members asked questions about west‑facing glazing, solar shading and the proposed materials. The applicant said the project includes laminated low‑E glazing and manufacturer‑supplied solar shades: “we planned for solar shades, which are manufactured by the window frame manufacturer.” Staff clarified parking and leasing: the airport owns the broader site and the project area is a lease parcel; staff said the project required 14 parking spaces for the uses on the lease parcel and that the airport had approved remote parking nearby and found there to be “ample parking next door.”

After questions about material contrast, Board member Fekih moved to approve the case per staff recommended stipulations with an additional stipulation that the applicant work with staff to resolve the appropriate distinction between tones of gray on the accent colors of the building; Vice Mayor DeBoschis seconded. The board voted yes as follows: Vice Mayor DeBoschis — yes; Vice Chair Brand — yes; Commissioner Gonzales — yes; Board member Peazer — yes; Board member Fekih — yes; Board member Mason — yes; Board member Robinson — yes. The motion passed 7‑0.

Ending: The stipulation requires the applicant to coordinate material samples with staff before final approval; staff said the physical material boards were due to arrive within minutes of the hearing.

","The Development Review Board approved case 11DR2024, a new hangar/terminal building tied to Flexjet, with a unanimous 7‑0 vote and a condition that the applicant work with staff to ensure sufficient contrast between gray materials and soffit tones.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6211224,"Resident launches petition asking council to delay Brown Avenue garage pending new parking study",361,216000,577000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3699314-f07f24dc93a19d4bebf6d75829b28be7&start=216&end=577","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3699314-f07f24dc93a19d4bebf6d75829b28be7/thumbnail_216000.jpg","/articles/6211224/Scottsdale/Maricopa-County/Arizona/Resident-launches-petition-asking-council-to-delay-Brown-Avenue-garage-pending-new-parking-study","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6211224-868b9e410d3704089e3cf4708fdfdd34/orig.mp4?Expires=1771195578&Signature=N7iUCvkEK-dXfAVjkOrf82X~p4sDs6VpZsQZZfEQ2S1M-YvoJjwckk69OxIpO~vODf1r4WlTzPFa2-rGw4M1EL~Ax4sNlLYP9PCx-Oj1Pqipckf-xF8lhavAuR1T5QmvvWzHXXUAtz7FOwtgvxlaDwZtZe36nIDbJB85Vp-iTJGaN4jI-Hw26tR9U7vaM5G0AlNAYJtcWIhEYH8BPOb8k2K6kvKZJidh4bUAHwnFnqroSGKf2B~UQj~WZtQuQwFvKlnQdJrRxcujTM~sQpYTpLYk3gsD~9najgw6eMAhqM960wcyCu6wjrwYxrqpXMYQT6aYKoe9YJIHadSzDuUlYQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Steve Sutton, a Scottsdale resident, told the Development Review Board he has created a petition asking the City Council to direct the city manager to investigate plans for a multi‑story garage at the Brown Avenue parking corral and to delay any construction contract until after public review.

Sutton told the board that “the mission is a unique and culturally significant pre World War 2 building that the United States Department of Interior has placed on the national register of historic places.” He said the petition asks the council to investigate whether adding a multi‑story garage at the Brown Avenue parking corral is needed and “whether alternative actions are sufficient for current and future parking needs and to not approve a construction contract at this location until this investigation is completed and presented to the residents of Scottsdale to have not less than 30 days to consider its findings.”

The nut graf: Sutton said his research — which included reviewing Scottsdale documents, council videos and meeting transcripts and speaking with long‑time local figures — convinced him “the public is going to overwhelmingly oppose building this garage unless city government can prove to the public satisfaction that the creation of more parking spaces by the building of this garage extension is essential and the only viable option.” He described a list of investigative measures he wants included in the review.

In his petition, Sutton asked the council to direct the city manager to use “all appropriate investigative methods, including the methods listed below,” and he named several specific steps: a new independent 2025 parking and traffic study of the southeast and southwest quadrants of Old Town that includes ride‑sharing impacts; new research into better signs directing drivers to parking areas; and electronic monitoring of parking to provide real‑time street‑side information to drivers.

Sutton said he is not part of the organized resident group that previously petitioned the council but that he expects broad public support: “As with my previous 2 dog park petitions, I've already discovered it will not be a problem convincing residents to support this petition.”

The Development Review Board did not take formal action on Sutton's petition during the meeting; Arizona law prohibits the board from discussing or taking action on non‑agendized items during public comment, a restriction staff reminded the board of at the start of public testimony.

Ending: Sutton asked the council to consider study methods and at least 30 days of public review before approving a construction contract; the petition and any council directive to the city manager would be matters for the City Council rather than the Development Review Board.

","A Scottsdale resident told the Development Review Board he has started a petition asking the City Council to direct the city manager to investigate whether a multi‑story garage at the Brown Avenue parking corral is necessary and to delay any contract approval until residents have at least 30 days to consider the findings.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

DRB approves remodel for new restaurant at 4242 N. Scottsdale Road after design change to patio

DRB approves second airpark hangar; board asks staff coordination on gray tones and soffit option

DRB approves San Alberto office; board asks for tougher stucco base near sidewalk

DRB approves Flexjet hangar at Scottsdale Airport with stipulation on gray‑tone contrast

Resident launches petition asking council to delay Brown Avenue garage pending new parking study