[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6210923,"mediaKeyId","3703016-50c50bf120e7622a4722920076a980b4","parentId",3703016,"title","Fire chief outlines apparatus replacement schedule; court asked to consider ordering new pumper with long lead time","audioSeconds",491,"startMs",6197000,"endMs",6688000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3703016-50c50bf120e7622a4722920076a980b4&start=6197&end=6688","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3703016-50c50bf120e7622a4722920076a980b4/thumbnail_6197000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6210923/Scott-County/Kentucky/Fire-chief-outlines-apparatus-replacement-schedule-court-asked-to-consider-ordering-new-pumper-with-long-lead-time","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6210923-90116d75d1b8d0e8f76ffd095f390e3c/orig.mp4?Expires=1775219782&Signature=PTqo-LB1CzCiASRqaQsv-SUAKLyP1~moqegD5Uf5l5LZLN4kBiu762cSnob-NYL8TaKzG6YoBOlljTWy2Lakv7kH8JgiBg7AYdMIbI6p41gkj68d205BnI~w7JOSE38FDi0UTtvGT1yu8Dq~nQWs0VZLx3QJgsu4aN5NQjbCd5nYDNBkmXiqEYS6Cura0IzRaivWyHkAI8S8oyl65hHb~MIV4L5MMm873KkPaN-~GVYgKvwAVxSoau1fHvRLdQfzf2wXweWe8rEakWsKeZnJNTOrZSsoSDkekoDhZdR08mL6KgpcynF~zNt9b4p-91etHsFPNcQNtTBW3plvOIh-og__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Scott County, KY ","date","2025-06-07T03:14:58Z","article","Scott County fire officials updated the fiscal court on apparatus delivery timelines and urged the county to consider contracting now for a new pumper that would arrive in roughly three years.

Why it matters: Fire apparatus have long lead times and large capital costs; a planned, phased replacement schedule reduces the risk of multiple aging units remaining in frontline service and helps spread costs across budget years.

What was reported. Fire leadership said the ladder truck ordered in 2022 is expected to arrive in September and will retire a 1999 ladder truck. Three pumpers on order are slated for delivery in January or February 2026; when they arrive, older pumpers (including units currently in frontline service) will shift to reserve status and two even older pumpers will be surplused. The department is now planning for a procurement that would replace the 2017 pumper and move that vehicle to reserve status when the new apparatus arrives around 2028.

Why staff recommends ordering now. Fire officials asked the court to authorize staff to enter a contract with a manufacturer because delivery of a custom pumper can take about 35 months. John Ward said the objective is to move an apparatus into reserve at about the 10–12 year mark — consistent with lifecycle guidance — rather than waiting until pumps are 20-plus years old and less reliable. \"If we can get a truck into reserve status...you're gonna extend the life of that apparatus,\" Ward told the court.

Budget and procurement questions. The court discussed payment timing and budgeting for a future purchase; officials emphasized the plan spreads costs over multiple fiscal years rather than requiring a single large outlay. No purchase motion was adopted at the meeting; the court asked staff to place an item on a future agenda to consider a contract and to return with budget options.

Operational implications. Court members noted the recent multiyear ordering plan (orders in 2022 and 2023) will substantially improve the county’s frontline fleet when all apparatus are delivered. Ward said the department is also working to standardize pumpers so spare parts and maintenance are more efficient when multiple identical units are in the fleet.

Ending: Staff will bring a procurement item for a new pumper to the court’s agenda with budget options; no contract was signed at this meeting.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Scott County Fiscal Court Work Session | June 6, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Scott County fire officials updated the fiscal court on apparatus delivery timelines and urged the county to consider contracting now for a new pumper that would arrive in roughly three years.","taxTitle","Scott County, Kentucky","taxId",55607,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6210928,"Court reviews Great Crossing Park playground options; $150,000 budgeted, purchase expected on next agenda",1640,5286000,3646000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3703016-50c50bf120e7622a4722920076a980b4&start=5286&end=3646","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3703016-50c50bf120e7622a4722920076a980b4/thumbnail_5286000.jpg","/articles/6210928/Scott-County/Kentucky/Court-reviews-Great-Crossing-Park-playground-options-150000-budgeted-purchase-expected-on-next-agenda","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6210928-582a78bfd6b8e3bb8fad9d0a778ede64/orig.mp4?Expires=1775219782&Signature=esoVVOG4YA9FYZbQ2XYj1Vy1hD26wsLZQ9rDzu9PSjpLTSnsE7XHWKelJtTwtxqZ5LxchizTh54N5ZJzNxMF02YQXqYfpY9yJJU6l5KpvkLjI58TSyYaHMl-Fygn7f2yA6S2onbtDzOCDl1omeCaDBaCZaSTvmC54NpLZOdcZO5s6S9UAit48UjIIrPFRP~6hm46oViNMc1FcbBXEzs0Irr60HZ1xgd4CeyBnqqeBAQGEBpW87Xeei-X2P-E4vsPMm0TXPM2HHjexE-PKdswIwPMFV5QR~y8dcY9nTKMvH0ff76WdUAlB~JZy7Zfe5TQ~d5yIYGDrrvOoE9ODkyaFw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Scott County parks staff presented playground design options for Great Crossing Park and sought direction on whether to proceed with equipment procurement from a vendor on the state bid list.

Why it matters: The County has $150,000 in the current budget for playground equipment at Great Crossing Park. Parks director Drew Beckett asked the court for permission to proceed with a purchase and for guidance on surfacing and site placement; the selected option affects both initial cost and future maintenance.

What was proposed. Beckett presented a site plan and two equipment/surface price points. A $149,000 package includes playground structures with colored crumb-rubber mulch surfacing; a higher-end poured-in-place surfacing option would raise cost to approximately $221,000. Beckett described the $149,000 option as meeting current needs and the poured-in-place surface as longer-lasting but significantly more expensive.

Magistrates and parks staff also discussed site logistics and safety. Beckett said he favored placing the playground near the existing parking at the southeast end of the site to take advantage of the field layout and to use a hillside for future integrated slides; he asked landscape architect Monica Sumner to provide a site-plan review and parking-extension recommendations before the order is placed. Several magistrates flagged parking limitations during events and asked staff to add parking and a safe pedestrian connection (sidewalk or crosswalk) between parking and the playground.

Funding and procurement. Beckett said Miracle of Kentucky and Tennessee is on the state bid list and could supply the equipment without a separate local bid. The court has $150,000 budgeted for the project this year; staff asked whether they should seek additional funds or pursue the $149,000 package. One magistrate recommended exploring grants for poured-in-place surfacing.

Schedule. Beckett asked to place a purchase item on the next county agenda (June 13). The court asked staff to return on Friday with a final recommendation and to bring a site plan showing parking adjustments prior to placing the order. No purchase contract was approved at the meeting.

Community considerations. Magistrates emphasized phased construction so future park expansion and additional ballfields would not be impeded, and requested staff include ADA routing and pedestrian safety in the final design. Beckett said the playground could be expanded in a second phase when additional park fields are built.

Ending: Staff will return to the court with a site-plan addendum from the county’s consultant and a recommendation on surfacing and bid/contract approach; the court expected a purchase authorization to be considered at the next business meeting.","Scott County parks staff presented playground design options for Great Crossing Park and sought direction on whether to proceed with equipment procurement from a vendor on the state bid list.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6210933,"Scott County staff outlines farmland preservation options; court to send proposals to planning commission",2322,2325000,4647000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3703016-50c50bf120e7622a4722920076a980b4&start=2325&end=4647","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3703016-50c50bf120e7622a4722920076a980b4/thumbnail_2325000.jpg","/articles/6210933/Scott-County/Kentucky/Scott-County-staff-outlines-farmland-preservation-options-court-to-send-proposals-to-planning-commission","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6210933-ea81f7ddaffc975db6895c515f1bada3/orig.mp4?Expires=1775219782&Signature=BaK50b~pi61K9uNjpOjnIOitA7y5OgORAs-tmve~qmWwvCsQM9h1MrYhgymnIDgPK9tn2GTOBdwSqWwgxB7KOBC5yibydsT4pu-oc-q-werH0XZt2LL8ibNEqBxYwcvY1R~vOpHwoTcelnueXf0pM6ORTagAkigLZZXuRkMf32dFsvYgYwCHoxN2lOrgi0DSQOT9r7B8fK-oRepOf~1VYzX-3G7s5BcaMD8Yf2YuZFS9zA3j1GGnAvl9UjSXtU2~IhTiR~XXfrDlsapBwdgjwKQznx1FO1MWdf3gAx5wHFke7UXxb0DwfTgtpuu9uUI9mWTgVyKD56lMtbcYMM7fRg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Scott County planning staff summarized the results of an outreach effort with agricultural stakeholders and presented a package of land-use and fiscal-policy recommendations the fiscal court can forward to the planning commission for formal review.

Why it matters: County staff reported an increase in small land divisions — particularly five-acre tracts — across Scott County and said those divisions are changing land-use patterns in agricultural areas. Staff and stakeholders discussed policy tools to preserve prime farmland and rural character while accommodating growth.

What staff presented. Staff member Holden Fleming said the outreach began in October and that mapping work shows ‘‘on parcels greater than 50 acres between 2010 and 2024 we lost 50 what we call large parcels.’’ He showed separate maps of five-acre divisions, prime farmland soils, and the county’s future land-use designations to illustrate where agricultural land conversion is concentrated. Fleming said the county has set aside $500,000 in this year’s budget for a purchase of development rights (PDR) program and recommended sending several land-use items to the planning commission for ordinance work.

Recommendations and options considered. Fleming listed a menu of potential policy responses discussed with stakeholders: revising accessory-dwelling rules (sometimes called granny flats), amending the county’s cluster-development rules to make them financially feasible, reconsidering the five-acre minimum parcel standard in some locations, creating multiple agricultural zoning categories (for example an A-2 or A-3 with different minimums), pursuing a transfer of development rights (TDR) program, and creating an agricultural liaison position or committee to help landowners navigate options such as conservation easements and PDR.

Stakeholder and magistrate concerns. Magistrates and participants debated trade-offs: some landowners wanted higher minimum lot sizes with compensation; developers and others said cluster rules are rarely used because the current regulatory burden makes projects financially infeasible. Fleming said cluster rules could be rewritten so developers still get housing units while preserving a substantial common reserve for agricultural use. One magistrate described cluster as a potential ‘‘both/and’’ solution: more housing but preservation of open reserve acreage that could remain farmable.

TDR, PDR and permanence. Fleming described PDR (purchase of development rights) as a program the court has funded and noted its permanence depends on easement terms; several magistrates asked whether TDR transactions remain effective if property is later annexed by a city. Staff explained that program design matters and recommended prohibiting TDR sending areas inside the county’s urban service boundary; any TDR scheme would require interlocal coordination so receiving municipalities honor recorded restrictions. Fleming said the planning office will draft specific legal language for any program sent forward and emphasized that recorded deed restrictions or easements are the practical tools for permanence.

Immediate procedural steps. Fleming asked the court to send the packet of land-use recommendations to the planning commission for workshops and hearings. The court agreed that accessory-dwelling rules appear to be the “low-hanging fruit” and asked staff to prioritize accessory-dwelling language and cluster-regulation amendments. Staff also said they will schedule public workshops and return eventual ordinance drafts to the court after planning commission review.

Other notes. Staff announced outreach events: a public picnic-with-the-planner on July 8 at Ward Hall and a Keiko-hosted webinar on July 9 about the state vehicle bill (SLSPV). The court also agreed to extend an existing moratorium on RV park-related ordinance changes to permit staff more time to finalize language; staff planned to place a moratorium-extension item on the June 13 agenda.

Ending: The court directed staff to forward the recommendations to the planning commission, with particular emphasis on accessory dwelling units and cluster-regulation changes, and to return with drafts and public-workshop dates for the court’s review.","Scott County planning staff summarized the results of an outreach effort with agricultural stakeholders and presented a package of land-use and fiscal-policy recommendations the fiscal court can forward to the planning commission for formal review.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6210938,"Scott County officials weigh ordinance to allow street-legal utility vehicles on county roads",2156,111000,2267000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3703016-50c50bf120e7622a4722920076a980b4&start=111&end=2267","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3703016-50c50bf120e7622a4722920076a980b4/thumbnail_111000.jpg","/articles/6210938/Scott-County/Kentucky/Scott-County-officials-weigh-ordinance-to-allow-street-legal-utility-vehicles-on-county-roads","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6210938-87b32f103ee84c9e701752fdd9211621/orig.mp4?Expires=1775219782&Signature=DtKvB2twFr7~l18CqhY9M~c-xl7yvnU4bpT0RcKVMRfVso4NtRgNW2Z1ZoW0YKeoN-Rf8F4b1ZLf-Q97neBYQ7XnnHOsQSiZ7bI1-dpLAmcc0rKPDi6YA~1dlOusvK~Ny87yj9cs4ujSgkglFXRLzseOC3XqECfRLGCiNt2LLJoHqgq9nTneLHze9ItY-82pAqeCTg6TCQ8ETRW8gmkTQellx0aKuOgFB-mQ2fUE528~efyK1nfOhShiSJ~rZs3ISWVjdzo2Rt7KJQTbzAnSsPJbLL78lc0Vadth5dsslBWug9qzkVMZGiHQzs3d1NzwMgv2oCL-JddnhS~jPOWEOA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Scott County Judge Crickett told the court on Friday that the meeting would include a presentation on “SLSPVs.” “In case you don't know what that acronym means, it's street legal special purpose vehicles,” he said, and asked county staff to explain the law’s options for the county.

Why it matters: Kentucky’s new law allows counties to adopt ordinances that permit certain off-road vehicles to be made street legal and used on county highways. Scott County faces a near-term timeline: state rules were discussed as being effective June 27 and staff recommended the court prepare a local ordinance draft and wait for Kentucky Transportation Cabinet guidance before finalizing rules.

County staff summarized the state framework and local options. A staff member identified three choices: take no action (which would bar SLSPVs in Scott County), adopt a countywide ordinance permitting them, or adopt a limited ordinance permitting SLSPVs only on enumerated roads. The presenter noted some state-set parameters discussed in the packet and said the statute calls out a 20-mile limit for travel \"at a given time on the county highway\" and specific equipment and safety requirements such as headlights, brakes, mirrors, seat belts and insurance.

Local law-enforcement and business perspectives were also heard. Sheriff Nettles was invited because his office would handle inspections and enforcement; he told the court the sheriff’s office could certify authorized inspectors but enforcement and inspection capacity must be considered. Mark Smith, owner of MLS Powersports, urged the court to permit an ordinance and explained the local economic context, saying MLS has grown into a regional destination and that dealers commonly outfit machines to meet other states’ on-road rules. \"We're completely Scott County grown and built business,\" Smith said. \"We sell our machines into 44 states at this point.\"

Magistrates raised practical questions about enforcement and equipment standards. They asked how the county would handle vehicle inspections, whether licensed dealerships could be certified as inspectors and whether local registration fees would cover inspection workload. The group discussed the difference between this law and existing low-speed vehicle (LSV) and golf-cart rules, with staff and stakeholders clarifying that LSVs and golf carts are governed under separate statutory categories.

The court also discussed geographic limits. Magistrates emphasized the need to exclude city streets and private roads and to coordinate with the county’s three cities. Several magistrates said language should make clear city-incorporated streets and private subdivision roads are excluded unless the city/HOA opts in. As one magistrate said, \"We gotta exclude private bridal streets. Let that...and incorporated city streets.\" (phrase as spoken)

Next steps and scheduling. The court directed staff to draft a model ordinance and share it with the sheriff, dealers and other stakeholders, then to return to the fiscal court for discussion at a rescheduled July work session. The court moved its July work session to July 3 to allow time for the Transportation Cabinet to issue implementation guidance and for staff to circulate a draft. County staff also said the clerk’s office could give registrants a notice that operating a plated SLSPV in Scott County may not be legal until the court adopts an ordinance.

No final ordinance vote was taken at the meeting. Instead, the court set an action plan: staff will draft language, consult with the sheriff and stakeholders, and present a recommended ordinance after the Transportation Cabinet issues its guidance.

What’s unresolved: the court did not adopt specific road-by-road limits, a speed-limit threshold for allowed roads, or a final inspection fee schedule. Staff noted the Transportation Cabinet could modify technical specifications when it issues guidance. Sheriff capacity, insurance tracking, and exact fee levels were left for follow-up.

Community and administrative context: Magistrates said they want to avoid confusing the public when state registration starts; one magistrate urged the clerk to provide a handout to new registrants explaining Scott County is still considering an ordinance. Staff also flagged a public webinar hosted by the Kentucky County Clerks Association on July 9 featuring the bill sponsor as a resource for drafting decisions.

Ending note: The court instructed staff to produce a draft ordinance for review at the July 3 work session and to return with clarifying materials from the Transportation Cabinet and the county clerk’s office so magistrates can consider a formal first reading later in July.","Scott County Judge Crickett told the court on Friday that the meeting would include a presentation on “SLSPVs.” “In case you don't know what that acronym means, it's street legal special purpose vehicles,” he said, and asked county staff to explain the law’s options for the county.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Fire chief outlines apparatus replacement schedule; court asked to consider ordering new pumper with long lead time

Court reviews Great Crossing Park playground options; $150,000 budgeted, purchase expected on next agenda

Scott County staff outlines farmland preservation options; court to send proposals to planning commission

Scott County officials weigh ordinance to allow street-legal utility vehicles on county roads