[{"_1":2,"_100":-5,"_101":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6210241,"mediaKeyId","3720495-4ef5622494b00896d6e9e6d27c58e732","parentId",3720495,"title","Panel advances automated juvenile expunction bill with earlier victim notice, DA review and OYA resources","audioSeconds",592,"startMs",1252000,"endMs",1844000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3720495-4ef5622494b00896d6e9e6d27c58e732&start=1252&end=1844","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3720495-4ef5622494b00896d6e9e6d27c58e732/thumbnail_1252000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6210241/Oregon/Panel-advances-automated-juvenile-expunction-bill-with-earlier-victim-notice-DA-review-and-OYA-resources","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6210241-768e9160e2a4f2209f5487c9b86031f0/orig.mp4?Expires=1773735318&Signature=gQW0f24QZDlBLWGBm73E5QikXawhl7N~5w3uj4jXq6Vf6uPG7vAU9Vxxkul4qbfkFH~IjoTGw8b0oeDsHrQK20h2WkplSsfJe88cP6RFxVVKQIcB5xiqGAkWfX2g5py1HAjuXbOqTu73f76Yu1GTADZ-iwAoKe6oZtnI5e-mrPtzdCojvrCz8NxseOoLyJ6qbH6xNV5CLPTPCtEBf8ZQh4JdnOLlu7wMbsKx3PwQEhG0agd5TOkN7frrgEDlKj4ZUVlhn7TXJQQF5AfUJlUkaZZHMs97IjduxzjWeTnMWaft6tjsxA1Hos4Cp-eBE2RdwpOugfohNywktqHjJF42Wg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Oregon State Legislature","date","2025-06-04T08:00:00Z","article","The Public Safety Subcommittee voted June 4 to move House Bill 2677 as amended to the Ways and Means Committee. The bill makes expunction a system‑initiated requirement for county juvenile departments within specified timeframes, automates much of the process for eligible cases, and adds new procedural protections including earlier victim notification and enhanced opportunity for district attorneys to review cases before expunction proceedings finalize.

Why it matters: supporters said the automated process addresses low uptake of existing expunction rights — the sponsor cited evidence that only a small fraction of eligible youth pursue expunctions under the current system — and argued that system‑initiated expunctions improve employment, housing and education outcomes that reduce recidivism. Opponents said they feared the changes could remove accountability or create unintended consequences for public safety.

Major provisions and committee action:

• Automation and eligibility: Under HB 2677 the state automates expunction for juveniles who meet eligibility (case closed, probation ended, not waived to adult court, waited specified time and are at least 18 at the time of expunction, no felony or class A misdemeanor convictions, no pending investigations or restitution owed). The bill preserves a group of serious offenses that remain ineligible.

• Victim notification and DA review: The bill moves victim notification earlier in the process so victims can be heard at a point when a judge may have discretion to alter case outcomes. It also strengthens procedures to ensure district attorneys receive timely information to review potential pending investigations or charging considerations.

• Timeline adjustments for collateral consequences: The measure extends the expunction timeline for certain violent misdemeanors where collateral consequences (for example, firearm restrictions) remain in effect.

• Resources: The dash‑a8 amendment adds $200,000 and 0.75 FTE for the Oregon Youth Authority to help process records and coordinate implementation.

Sponsor remarks: Representative Chudson, the bill's chief sponsor, framed the measure as the third step in a multiyear effort to automate juvenile expunctions and to fix problems from earlier bills. He said the earlier changes left gaps in victim notice and DA review and that only a small share of eligible people used their expunction rights under the prior system. He told the committee that \"only 3 to 7 percent of youth who have a right ... end up taking advantage of that\" because the process is confusing and resource‑intensive; the sponsor argued automation would increase equitable access to expunctions.

Opposition and concerns: Representative Lewis said she would register a no vote on the floor but supported moving the bill to allow fuller debate; Representative Pompridge and others said they remain opposed. Some members expressed concerns about specific categories of offenses and about the implications of expanding automated processes to young adults.

Formal action: the committee adopted the dash‑a8 amendment and moved HB 2677 as amended to Ways and Means with a due‑pass recommendation. The transcript records objections from Representative Lewis and Representative Helfrich during final recording of objections, and Senator Brock Smith was excused. The LFO recommended the amendment because the Oregon Youth Authority houses juvenile records and needs additional resources to process automated expunctions.

Next steps: HB 2677 as amended will be carried to the full committees for further debate.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Joint Committee On Ways and Means Subcommittee On Public Safety 06/04/2025 8:00 AM","oneSentenceSummary","House Bill 2677, which requires system‑initiated juvenile expunctions in eligible cases and moves victim notification earlier in the process, was moved June 4 to Ways and Means after adoption of a dash‑a8 amendment that adds $200,000 and 0.75 FTE for Oregon Youth Authority support.","taxTitle","Public Safety, Ways and Means, Joint, Committees, Legislative, Oregon","taxId",18852,"location","Oregon","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6210245,"Committee advances bill letting State Fire Marshal seek cost recovery from negligent parties",93,1139000,1232000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3720495-4ef5622494b00896d6e9e6d27c58e732&start=1139&end=1232","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3720495-4ef5622494b00896d6e9e6d27c58e732/thumbnail_1139000.jpg","/articles/6210245/Oregon/Committee-advances-bill-letting-State-Fire-Marshal-seek-cost-recovery-from-negligent-parties","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6210245-073d3c8c9cbfb1d92a7d458b2bf2871e/orig.mp4?Expires=1773735319&Signature=QvJBIhkhaVeWXRfj2CpMYfT6P39cwUVVr4kJPnFdZbaztggtAfNwLLwrwlys5rgmUn40aWejOvia-j71exzC-zQ4-bcVXALp96i-gXDA4fCXHwWL6dSIDpBOq1LfDAYr-T3N-iwi-FEYsVmJChVJO~0PQuJnB3DAmlDTyAT1Gl~jocAmV8~p2nI2uTGE5clZjxhNbXk2oHTATW1C7I1jj6dGqTmt6WyqvoqpCkL2Cpd3S9r2uaVjpXaryAFm2tTAzztsHTROfqIi4Q5Y7k-Ht-rPnfDyI~XeGYda-r12B5CCLTI68auqr0PLosXrpFpI~MLuHXag4lwwonyEIPd4xQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Public Safety Subcommittee voted June 4 to move Senate Bill 863 to the Ways and Means Committee, recommending authority for the Department of the State Fire Marshal to recover suppression costs from a person who was willful, malicious or negligent in the origin or spread of a fire.

The measure defines “actual cost” as the cost incurred or payments made by the Department to control or extinguish a fire and includes legal authority for investigation and collection. The LFO told the committee that anticipated implementation costs are minimal and can be absorbed in the department's budget, but that the revenue impact is indeterminate because the number of qualifying fires and the collectability and timing of recoveries are unknown.

The bill does not designate a disposition for potential revenue, allowing the department to deposit any recovered funds into the same fund where original expenses were recorded so revenue matches expense consistent with generally accepted accounting principles, the LFO said.

Formal action: the committee moved SB 863 to Ways and Means with a due‑pass recommendation. The transcript records no objections in committee and notes Senator Brock Smith was excused during the vote.

Discussion in committee focused on the statutory definition of recoverable costs and the practical limits of collection; the LFO emphasized the uncertain revenue picture.

Next step: SB 863 will be carried forward to the full Ways and Means Committee.","The Public Safety Subcommittee moved Senate Bill 863 to Ways and Means on June 4. The measure would let the Department of the State Fire Marshal recover fire suppression costs from people found willful, malicious or negligent; revenue impact was described as indeterminate.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6210249,"Budget panel advances State Fire Marshal funding, adds one-time wildfire and mobilization dollars",795,70000,865000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3720495-4ef5622494b00896d6e9e6d27c58e732&start=70&end=865","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3720495-4ef5622494b00896d6e9e6d27c58e732/thumbnail_70000.jpg","/articles/6210249/Oregon/Budget-panel-advances-State-Fire-Marshal-funding-adds-one-time-wildfire-and-mobilization-dollars","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6210249-c6ba5b7b9500ad33797e49fdd0f0826f/orig.mp4?Expires=1773735318&Signature=DT4ZJhTJ~gLNYpqNxZhYso9nDk5xvV6uRaUXnB6GoUG~3CXlsyzJGONs4GWkp5LxeNe0CSQV8SqSHHoMjyOIF-qbOYhqDfQZUUS7V~AzhiWdAynNzbXCbdHzwusfHSVwmz8SyUpDe60WoeIDwHQ5AdIqQXn281lLCsDRW0L7decYdMt0ZnuWw1d~0DLb5XfldjeOCeD8QbjzLPCbIg5pFidX02j34FV0d2TCiNZI0s3axBEkUilodXrVNPShviIg1Ysg2QbCcvmHk7jOE82OxPU-dUw9sx26jKskzP7g-wmgVIM-vkiyzaBMOr8kEF9heQgHizNHMGcAX8Ha4h3Tvg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Public Safety Subcommittee voted June 4 to move Senate Bill 5538 as amended to the Ways and Means Committee, endorsing the Legislative Fiscal Office's recommendation for the Department of the State Fire Marshal budget.

The LFO recommended a department total of about $93.1 million in expenditure limitation, comprised of $38,837,243 in general fund, $53,641,436 in other funds, $629,349 in federal funds, and 159 positions (158.76 FTE). The recommendation represents a 43.4% decrease from the 2023–25 legislatively approved budget and a 26.7% increase above current service level, primarily because fire‑season costs from 2023–24 are phasing out while three policy packages totaling about $19.6 million and 2 positions (1.76 FTE) are added.

Why it matters: the package includes one‑time and ongoing spending aimed at wildfire readiness and cost‑flow needs during federal reimbursement delays. The subcommittee adopted a dash‑1 amendment that formalizes the figures and moves the bill forward.

Key budget components described by the LFO and discussed in the work session include:

• A $2.5 million increase in other funds expenditure limitation funded by fire insurance premium tax (FIPT); $1.3 million of that is one‑time consultant costs to modernize the mutual aid tracking system and create an electronic reimbursement submission process; $1.2 million is ongoing for IT lifecycle, licensing and training.

• A $6 million one‑time general fund package for 2026 wildfire season staffing grants and a $10 million one‑time increase in other funds for fire costs in the State Fire Marshal mobilization fund (funded by beginning balance from FEMA reimbursements), of which about $6 million supports readiness response and $4 million supports mobilization cash flow. The LFO noted the state previously provided $18.2 million in general fund while awaiting FEMA reimbursements, and the $10 million deposit leaves $8.2 million owed back to the general fund based on prior cash flow.

• Policy adjustments across divisions including procurement reclassifications, the establishment of two permanent fire risk reduction specialist positions with $611,264 general fund (including $72,940 one‑time vehicle acquisitions), and technical adjustments reducing certain general fund special payments.

The subcommittee also approved the department's key performance measures as presented by the LFO. Representative Graeber said of one measure — the average percentage of structure saved after a declared conflagration — “That's a remarkable KPI to hit at 100%,” adding that it is a “lofty goal” for those who execute the mission in the field.

Two budget notes were adopted. The first directs the Department of State Fire Marshal to submit new key performance measures related to regulatory services, fire and life safety services, and fire and life safety education to the interim Joint Committee on Ways and Means by January 2026, including proposed tracking and targets for 2027–28. The second directs the department to fill the internal auditor position provided in House Bill 5036 (2023 session) and to report monthly to the Legislative Fiscal Office and the Department of Administrative Services Chief Financial Office on recruitment and onboarding until the position is filled.

Formal actions recorded in the work session included motions to move the LFO recommendation, to adopt the dash‑1 amendment, and to move the amended bill to Ways and Means. The transcript records no objections in committee and notes Senator Brock Smith was excused during the votes.

Discussion: members and co‑chairs emphasized the continuing fiscal uncertainty of federal reimbursements and the need for sustainable, long‑term funding for wildfire response and emergency management. Committee members praised the agency's work while warning that additional requests for supplemental funding are likely if the 2025 fire season intensifies.

Next steps: SB 5538 as amended was recommended to the full Ways and Means Committee.","The Public Safety Subcommittee voted June 4 to move Senate Bill 5538, the Department of State Fire Marshal budget, to the Ways and Means Committee with a dash‑1 amendment that sets a roughly $93.1 million agency budget including $38.8 million in general fund and multiple one‑time wildfire and mobilization allocations.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Panel advances automated juvenile expunction bill with earlier victim notice, DA review and OYA resources

Committee advances bill letting State Fire Marshal seek cost recovery from negligent parties

Budget panel advances State Fire Marshal funding, adds one-time wildfire and mobilization dollars