[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6209690,"mediaKeyId","3734139-28b60abd9a668a68b9eebdc79a6e6cb2","parentId",3734139,"title","Council reopens decision on 501 A South Key smoke-shop permit after neighborhood objections","audioSeconds",2690,"startMs",3485000,"endMs",6175000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3734139-28b60abd9a668a68b9eebdc79a6e6cb2&start=3485&end=6175","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3734139-28b60abd9a668a68b9eebdc79a6e6cb2/thumbnail_3485000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6209690/Lampasas/Lampasas-County/Texas/Council-reopens-decision-on-501-A-South-Key-smoke-shop-permit-after-neighborhood-objections","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6209690-a7b655fc97c9472a080929926adfb370/orig.mp4?Expires=1771176219&Signature=dbGFmEOX3nELiyE8R0DAdrZnA-s9hGy3yCrHtCTF5wwNsz3dP7OxN~C6bzV3owH~1Yvz~J00fS5jLkX7t5XO6zP9Yju~1E0IpQsgNrOmz~4zONy8iW~iSKyyMZjyo~VbCsQRwW6Vq1tVBtkp1CJGxg7HdKOt6IGtseehgyF7sz~gDYFdfddvruN8J0Rqdi4LxZzxKQu3Kz8NLxCiYFycQ4F~YXO5cocBkk5d0SW7yCErH~7zBftJps0HdhpkyCSmNgfUIQDFAxR-A88hmKS-k5G5xCxb~tk2a9cPWiFgwamF4iJX9HlwtNgtfYplrR8Db12-f35rm58EXxoIyenZVw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","City Council of Lampasas TX","date","2025-06-10T08:16:57.9Z","article","The Lampasas City Council considered public comments and staff presentations on a request for a specific-use permit to allow a smoke shop at 501 A South Key Avenue during Monday’s meeting.

Planning staff told the council the applicant sought an SUP for a smoke shop at the property commonly known as 501 A South Key; the proposal had passed the Planning and Zoning Commission 6–1. Planning staff reported receiving at least one letter of opposition at the commission hearing and additional correspondence opposing the SUP submitted later.

Residents and business owners spoke at the public hearing. Business owner Mike Hill asked the council to re-examine parking requirements for the building at the corner and said he wanted the planning commission’s analysis and minutes to be available. Several residents—one noting concerns about vaping and youth—said the location, directly across from a church that houses a preschool, was inappropriate. One commenter said the neighborhood should “elevate the standards” for businesses on the city’s main corridor.

Counsel at the dais reminded council members that the 2016 ordinance permits smoke and vape shops in retail and commercial districts by SUP, and that denial must be based on stated findings—such as the use being incompatible with surrounding uses or having unmitigated negative impacts on property values. Staff noted a convenience store on the corner already sells tobacco products; council members discussed whether that existing business undercuts a denial based on competitive or locational grounds.

Council action: A councilmember moved to deny the SUP on the basis that the use would be incompatible with surrounding uses and that the church and the school across the street had protested. After discussion, the council moved to rescind that denial motion and instead “take no action” on the SUP and place the item on the next council agenda. The effect in the meeting record is that the denial motion was withdrawn and the SUP will be reconsidered at a future session.

Why it matters: The SUP debate raises questions about zoning standards on a main corridor, the city’s ability to regulate retail products such as nicotine and low‑THC vape products near sensitive uses, and how the council applies compatibility and property-impact grounds when neighbors object. Planning staff said the existing ordinance requires the council to articulate specific findings if it denies an SUP.

Remaining questions: Council members asked staff to confirm whether the corner convenience store sells THC-containing vape products, and whether state or local drug-free–zone rules affect the SUP when a preschool is nearby. Staff did not provide a definitive answer on the THC question during the meeting and said they would follow up. The council did not adopt a final decision at the meeting; the item will return for further consideration.

Ending: The council left the SUP unresolved by formal vote and directed staff to bring the item back on the next regular agenda for further information and consideration.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Workshop & City Council Meeting - June 9, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","A contested specific-use permit (SUP) for a smoke shop at 501 A South Key Avenue drew opposition from a nearby church and school; planning commission recommended approval 6–1, council members initially moved to deny, then rescinded and tabled the item for a future meeting.","taxTitle","Lampasas, Lampasas County, Texas","taxId",69546,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6209694,"County appraisal chief warns understaffing, mapping gaps are costing Lampasas taxing units",2935,29000,2964000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3734139-28b60abd9a668a68b9eebdc79a6e6cb2&start=29&end=2964","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3734139-28b60abd9a668a68b9eebdc79a6e6cb2/thumbnail_29000.jpg","/articles/6209694/Lampasas/Lampasas-County/Texas/County-appraisal-chief-warns-understaffing-mapping-gaps-are-costing-Lampasas-taxing-units","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6209694-64ee1c98be47487c1c8a09815df6b46b/orig.mp4?Expires=1771176219&Signature=SlOxXplk-fAeGFAjzjAY5rFztBiFGlwWwz4kdnIH~mY0YhUA8Cm8Y4VXajAfb~U1CiSy6Xwdm3NfewLlB5YrMHilGSkqvZXqhg5~tl-Me~Zu5FOlVCT-RLVzkV0te79t8TSS9u~AvyqWOQPwKVFCYtTWBeNuW2PuTyIY56KYVlulyu3fHTLryf~eFqzYB-ruz47waprh9UP2Jb7Kt6L9Qknqu~pbxKAHESu0v93iFdtNILM1fGoGJl92pUnaqkoDyC91nsVb0-6Cb0VgSA2V1jnEvqrc7jYc6QDEEZLCE2rK1-p4blmpQ8SZoznHQVVRZ-ak9xdnrcez884O-tzjyg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Juan Salcedo, chief appraiser for the Lampasas County Appraisal District, told the Lampasas City Council on Monday that the appraisal district is behind on mapping and reappraisal work and is under-resourced for current construction and subdivision activity.

Salcedo said the district is operating “with 2 appraisers at this time” while handling roughly 2,000,532 parcels and contending with a surge in subdivisions and new homes. He told council members the district’s vendor has identified thousands of unmapped or unidentifiable parcels that have led to lost taxable value for local taxing units.

The appraisal chief said the district moved to new software in 2023 and has since found sharp increases in workload tied to data corrections and mapping. “We drew over 15,800 parcels in 1 year,” he said of the vendor’s mapping effort, and later noted the vendor had brought that total to 16,475 parcels. Salcedo said the vendor’s report shows about 3,557 parcels still cannot be identified by the district or its GIS vendor, and that 106 of those remain unresolved after recent work.

Why it matters: LCAD’s corrective work can add taxable value for the city and other taxing units; Salcedo framed the FY25–26 budget request as an investment that would recover lost revenue and keep the district compliant with state tiering and audit standards. He told council members the district had been budgeting as a smaller “tier 3” office even though a 2012 population shift moved Lampasas into the Comptroller’s “tier 2” classification, which carries higher operational expectations.

Most important facts: Salcedo presented a proposed FY25–26 budget of approximately $1.58 million (appraisal and collection combined) and said the appraisal-only portion (after an 80/20 split) would be in the neighborhood of $1.01 million. He said the district projects the city’s preliminary additional levy revenue (using last year’s tax rate for initial calculations) would be roughly $430,659 compared with last year, while the district’s requested local share of the new budget was about $47,290 for the city. He emphasized these are starting estimates based on last year’s tax rate and not an instruction to raise tax rates.

Staffing and operations: Salcedo recommended expanding the appraisal staff, saying the International Association of Assessing Officers staffing guidance implies the county needs roughly 10 appraisers to keep current on a county of Lampasas’s parcel count; the district currently budgets for far fewer. “You need 10 appraisers,” he said, adding the office currently has two certified appraisers working in the field and several staff in collections and mapping roles. Salcedo also told council that certified level-4 appraisers are difficult to recruit; his office is fast-tracking two level-3 appraisers toward level 4 by year-end.

Mapping, reappraisal and compliance: Salcedo said the district has not completed a multi-year reappraisal plan on schedule since 2020 and that the pace of new subdivisions and home construction—he cited roughly 300 homes identified this year in one new subdivision alone—has outstripped the district’s capacity. He said the district is moving toward more frequent aerial flights (biannual rather than the current three-year cycle) and additional mapping work to keep parcel data current.

Legal and audit context: Salcedo noted Lampasas’s Comptroller tier change in 2012 and said the district has been underbudgeting compared with tier-2 operational survey averages. He also said the district’s board of directors has approved the proposed budget and that the next steps are a public hearing and adoption of a final budget in July.

Remaining questions and next steps: Council members pressed for clarification about which taxing units will benefit and whether the increased workload is driven by countywide development outside the city limits. Salcedo said the growth is regional across the county and that the district will continue to work with cities and school districts to allocate improvements equitably. The appraisal district requested two additional appraisers, improved staff training and retention measures, digitization of historical records, biannual aerial flights, and cybersecurity and building repairs to protect servers. The council did not make an immediate vote on city funding during the presentation; Salcedo said the district’s board already approved the proposed budget and that it will move to a July public hearing and final adoption process.

Ending: Salcedo offered to provide the council with the underlying spreadsheets and preliminary levy calculations; he closed by urging the city to consider the requested allocations as an investment that would recover lost taxable value rather than an automatic tax increase.","Lampasas County Chief Appraiser Juan Salcedo told the city council the Lampasas County Appraisal District (LCAD) is understaffed and behind on mapping and reappraisal work, projecting lost taxable value and seeking a higher FY25–26 budget and two additional appraisers.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Council reopens decision on 501 A South Key smoke-shop permit after neighborhood objections

County appraisal chief warns understaffing, mapping gaps are costing Lampasas taxing units