Lafayette planners review housing project addressing California's housing shortage

The Design Review Commission meeting held on June 9, 2025, in Lafayette, Contra Costa County, focused on a proposed housing project amid California's ongoing housing shortage. The meeting began with a review of the project’s architectural and landscape design, with commissioners expressing both support and concerns.

Commissioner John initiated the discussion by acknowledging the state's housing crisis and the limitations imposed on local developments. He noted that the current proposal is less dense than previous options, which could have included taller buildings. While he appreciated the overall design, he expressed a desire for more detailed architectural elements, particularly regarding window design and privacy concerns for neighboring properties.

Commissioner Richard echoed John's sentiments, highlighting the thoughtful integration of the buildings into the hillside and the variety of unit types. He praised the design's aesthetic appeal and the attention given to landscaping, particularly along the northern property line, where screening trees were planned to enhance privacy.

Another commissioner raised concerns about the height of retaining walls, suggesting that the proposed 12 to 13-foot walls could be visually imposing and difficult to conceal with landscaping. This concern was shared by others, who emphasized the need for effective screening to mitigate the impact on neighboring properties.

The architect of the project, Jennifer Master, addressed these concerns, explaining that the retaining wall height varies due to the slope of the hillside and that new landscaping would be implemented to soften the visual impact. She assured the commission that efforts were made to preserve existing trees and enhance the natural environment surrounding the development.

As the meeting progressed, commissioners discussed the urgency of the project timeline, noting that a final determination must be made within 180 days. This deadline, approaching in mid-August, adds pressure to finalize the design and address any outstanding issues.

In conclusion, while the commission expressed general support for the project, they emphasized the need for further analysis on privacy mitigation and the visual impact of retaining walls. The meeting underscored the balance between addressing housing needs and maintaining community standards in design and aesthetics. The commission plans to move forward with a resolution, hoping that staff will adequately address the concerns raised.