[{"_1":2,"_123":-5,"_124":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,111],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6204269,"mediaKeyId","3779144-8233e124e576d3ea0368880ba3ccd3c2","parentId",3779144,"title","Commission approves annexation of 4-Corners parcel from Gallatin Gateway to Central Valley Fire District amid neighbors’ concerns","audioSeconds",2100,"startMs",1419000,"endMs",3519000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3779144-8233e124e576d3ea0368880ba3ccd3c2&start=1419&end=3519","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3779144-8233e124e576d3ea0368880ba3ccd3c2/thumbnail_1419000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6204269/Gallatin-County/Montana/Commission-approves-annexation-of-4-Corners-parcel-from-Gallatin-Gateway-to-Central-Valley-Fire-District-amid-neighbors-concerns","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6204269-bf3df8077a1fe523a2ace2c2a82c9800/orig.mp4?Expires=1775203101&Signature=e93CObIDE71eUlwRx2s-OTo9UhM7LvUx83Ws9MiiBUEByCoX8kFWEs06YoXItuNBzpP6uFzTOIJNKGSRUZJ~FElohM-iid3FcgTJnx4AbUpDScUtksByrZ4q19g8qWPf7Xkytkx-dXRPh2c5yv1BqAq5KxoMBgSsjWqzHuDE1OHC2YsvSwlGFXPJQuY069-ZxtAee9JeWkvi49ibzbplVuuVefCahlYgWxr2pkKW6jJCGkRmMFM7kz44xtjLmHtoesPYuQFdaHWhAHpl-xy3FAs9SniUhsoND-cNf4mmOno6EbB24pk8nTiPmejWoSqqrAP-LWiD9Frzt3iNv2rdvg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","MT / Gallatin County","date","2025-06-10T00:00:00Z","article","Gallatin County commissioners on Tuesday approved a petition to withdraw a single parcel from the Gallatin Gateway Rural Fire District and annex it into the Central Valley Fire District, finding that the transfer showed “more advantageous proximity and communications” with Central Valley’s firefighting facilities as required by state statute.

Clerk and Recorder Eric Semerad opened the item, noting the petition (filed May 20) claimed signatures of all property owners for the single parcel at the southwest corner of the 4‑Corners intersection. Semerad told the commission he had published notice in the Bozeman Daily Chronicle and notified both fire districts; he also said he would correct a typographical error in the draft resolution that incorrectly stated notice was mailed to landowners (the applicable annexation statute does not require mailing notice to landowners for transfers between adjacent fire districts).

During public comment, nearby residents and the Gallatin Gateway Rural Fire District urged the commission to deny or continue the petition so the two districts could engage in more coordinated discussion. Terry Patterson, district clerk for Gallatin Gateway, said Gateway’s board and chief had not been informed in advance of the petition and that the transfer would reduce Gateway’s revenue base by $1,116.45 on the county tax bill. The Gateway representative also said mutual aid arrangements and staffing questions meant Central Valley’s capacity to serve the parcel was not clearly superior.

Central Valley Fire District’s acting chief, Fire Marshal Jake Salome, said the annexation request principally reflects property‑owner interest in lower insurance premiums and in access to Central Valley’s services, which include a transport ambulance and 24/7 staffed Station 3 with career firefighters and paramedics. Salome told commissioners Central Valley maintains a Public Protection Classification rating of 3 and provides advanced life support transport; he said Station 3 is staffed “24/7, 365” by career personnel and noted volunteers augment staffing.

Legal counsel Leanne Certain of the county attorney’s office advised the commission the governing statute (7‑33‑2126 MCA) requires the commission to allow transfer only if the petition shows “more advantageous proximity and communications with the firefighting facilities of the other district.” Semerad and staff supplied basic tax and valuation information: the property’s taxable value meant Gallatin Gateway would receive roughly $1,116.45 if the parcel remained in that district; under Central Valley’s mills the owner would pay about $2,400 in district taxes, information Central Valley said the petitioner accepted in exchange for potential insurance savings.

Commissioners expressed frustration that the two districts had not engaged in a pre‑hearing conversation and that the petitioner was not present. Some commissioners said they would be inclined to continue the hearing to allow more interagency discussion and to hear from the petitioner; others said the statutory standard focused only on proximity and communications and that those factors did not favor denial. After deliberation, a commissioner moved to approve Resolution 2025‑044; the motion passed by voice vote.

The commission’s action transfers the parcel’s taxing authority and fire‑service affiliation to Central Valley Fire District. Staff noted the transfer affects the districts’ tax bases and urged any future disputes or boundary adjustments be discussed in interagency forums. Attorneys and staff also noted that denial for insufficient communications is discretionary; the statutory test governs the commission’s decision in the absence of sufficient protest.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Gallatin County Commission June 10, 2025 ","oneSentenceSummary","Gallatin County commissioners approved a petition to withdraw a parcel from the Gallatin Gateway Rural Fire District and annex it into the Central Valley Fire District after a public hearing in which Gateway officials raised financial and communication concerns and Central Valley cited its 24/7 staffing and PPC rating.","taxTitle","Gallatin County, Montana","taxId",48744,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6204274,"Gallatin County approves $19.28 million Spanish Peaks rural improvement district bonds to fund Big Sky fire station",1005,394000,1399000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3779144-8233e124e576d3ea0368880ba3ccd3c2&start=394&end=1399","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3779144-8233e124e576d3ea0368880ba3ccd3c2/thumbnail_394000.jpg","/articles/6204274/Gallatin-County/Montana/Gallatin-County-approves-1928-million-Spanish-Peaks-rural-improvement-district-bonds-to-fund-Big-Sky-fire-station","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6204274-dc3c968b69a76a392eb3bf5bd6e693cb/orig.mp4?Expires=1775203101&Signature=TkqcX96o8DPr6d7lD0-1sQcL-Q60E759oYeACd9aaTYxOcIjS~C62tT32xVz~Qdx2BSwIBlxG4~VEJOCdxVL-G32AS4kan5vvsYn3FxdjXkTSZU9STstoZTgPHrcBL0qSZExYIOfIM2Q2tBi5S0ttdYU0cNF0KZtNnXOIeNVyKqbnf~O3AGsxUanKZGX0E3d0LItyf-hAP78B9XuBzxsmbApnFKF9mnxWNNMCBxo~AViGsV92x-fBZEMltk3vsrIQW54VpRX4if5dyd5lBPr5fDIVB1pnU3oIoyMtBJP0OltNutVt3gKOK~KRGzwbcG4xkTFBx65JR-VaWxQDkTg0A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Gallatin County commissioners on Tuesday approved a resolution to issue $19,283,000 in bonds for a new fire station serving the Spanish Peaks resort area, financing the project through a multicounty rural improvement district.

The resolution authorizes Gallatin County to act as the bond issuer for the Spanish Peaks Rural Improvement District, which was formed jointly with Madison County. Under the financing plan, assessments levied on properties inside the district will repay the bonds; Gallatin County taxpayers outside the RID will not be responsible for the debt.

The resolution matters because the new station is intended to improve emergency response in a wildland area that participants described as entirely “in the wild lands,” where wildfire risk is high and development has increased. County staff explained the financing structure to the commission, listing segregated project and debt-service accounts that will be used to ensure construction and debt payments come only from district assessments.

In a presentation to the commission, the county’s bond counsel explained that the district was formed after two resolutions of intention and a public hearing that produced no written protests. She said R&R Taylor Construction was selected as the construction contractor and Lone Mountain Land Company has agreed to contribute $1,250,000 toward total project costs estimated at roughly $19 million.

Bridal Eckstrom, representing DA Davidson as underwriter, told the commission the bonds were successfully sold May 29 to a mix of individual and institutional investors. She said purchasing bond insurance raised the issue’s credit to a double-A rating and lowered interest costs, reducing the assessment per parcel by “a little over $200 a year” compared with earlier projections. Eckstrom said 690.5 parcels are in the district and that the insurance and a $200,000 reserve will provide additional protection against delinquencies.

County staff noted US Bank Trust Company will act as paying agent and trustee, receiving assessment receipts from the counties and paying bondholders. The resolution includes provisions permitting early redemption by property owners who wish to remove the special assessment from their parcels by paying the outstanding principal pro rata.

Commissioners asked whether Madison County needed to repeat the same bond process; staff explained state law requires the county where the physical improvement is located to issue the bonds and that Madison County’s obligations are set out in the interlocal agreement and its own resolutions. Commissioners also asked whether recent state law changes affecting certain service districts altered RID logistics; counsel replied they did not.

After no public comment, a commissioner moved adoption of Resolution 2025-043; the motion passed by voice vote. Commissioners and presenters emphasized that annual maintenance of the facility will be the responsibility of the Big Sky Fire District “provided that their budget authority is available,” language the county included in the bond documents. Closing and execution activities, staff said, are scheduled with an anticipated closing on June 18.

The commission’s action sets the financing and legal structure in place so the joint RID board can proceed with construction and contract closing steps. Implementation depends on the scheduled closing, assessment collection, and the Big Sky Fire District’s future maintenance funding authority.

","Gallatin County commissioners adopted a resolution authorizing $19,283,000 in Rural Improvement District (RID) bonds for a new Spanish Peaks–Big Sky fire station. The bonds will be repaid by assessments on properties inside the multicounty RID; county general funds will not back the debt.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6204255,"Commission approves Penwell Bridge Farm five‑lot preliminary plat to support conservation and agricultural transition",1419,8431000,9850000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3779144-8233e124e576d3ea0368880ba3ccd3c2&start=8431&end=9850","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3779144-8233e124e576d3ea0368880ba3ccd3c2/thumbnail_8431000.jpg","/articles/6204255/Gallatin-County/Montana/Commission-approves-Penwell-Bridge-Farm-fivelot-preliminary-plat-to-support-conservation-and-agricultural-transition","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6204255-8251f33139774f05e331e7b99776387d/orig.mp4?Expires=1775203101&Signature=GSZxbgPmSm~6g8vwt7fAoWhfuOtusY0A7ChAykfXgF3uI3XsRCcjZJX9BKJGQ0Fj9-ZHnrOkzFQWIPIvYKNKFzfNOfqZQWe1PJm5GlGmBEQMpI4LiO74rRzr9fs9eIRpw0feOXKWG64z-ms5pn3gyaFs-MuZQ7jNGxUSucrWaqSbWx-363bF1ZEJ9jiqoaHrt1UGvjV-yHLBVQpVFTOWXfqh1OQGs9G3FN8uZfQyb7LbAt~8pkqdLNcoRI6JWA4wBlKCrq4N0d7R33TsX6~UC2Z-JWHS-xGG8UE-4VAcvRh8SOkfe-keXkYHVSrVNgHblpgbGsUI~VroFglWAwZAZg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Gallatin County commissioners approved preliminary plat approval for the Penwell Bridge Farm minor subdivision, a five‑lot reconfiguration of a 160‑acre homestead intended to pair limited residential development with long‑term agricultural conservation and support for a neighboring organic dairy operation.

Planning staff presented the project as a five‑lot minor subdivision at 4150 Penwell Bridge Road, northeast of Belgrade. The proposal would divide the parcel into lots ranging from approximately 2.5 to 149 acres; the historic homestead (with two existing dwellings) will remain on the lot identified as Lot 4. The applicant team and project representatives said their intent is to place Lot 1 into a conservation easement and partner with the Gallatin Valley Land Trust (GBLT) and Althea Dairy (an adjacent organic dairy and vegetable operation) to preserve the bulk of the property for agricultural use and to provide affordable pathways to ownership for regenerative farmers.

Engineer and project lead Marlena Sade (Synergy Engineering) said a year of groundwater monitoring confirmed suitability for on‑site wastewater treatment and that the Central Valley Fire Department reviewed the fire protection plan. The design uses three shared driveways to access Penwell Bridge Road and places potential home sites away from creeks and sensitive areas. Staff said the subdivision meets Gallatin County subdivision regulations; no variances were requested. The applicant noted discussions with a neighboring developer regarding shared use of a firefighting pond are ongoing but that any shared arrangement would require Central Valley Fire Department approval before final plat.

Members of the farming team described the broader conservation and agricultural goals. Dominic Grant, representing the landowner and Dirt Capital Partners, explained the developer’s work with regenerative farmers and said the subdivision and proposed conservation easement are intended to reduce the purchase price for local farmers and preserve agricultural operations. Sue and Nate Brown of Althea Dairy described long‑standing farm operations on adjacent property and said the arrangement would secure land for continued organic dairy, vegetable production and community engagement (plant sales, u‑pick, farm events).

After no unresolved objections and staff confirmation that conditions can be met, a commissioner moved to approve preliminary plat, finding the proposal complies with the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act and county subdivision regulations. Commissioners praised the partnership and the project’s potential to protect agricultural land and provide continued community access to local food production.

Preliminary plat approval allows the applicant to continue detailed engineering, finalize any shared‑fire‑pond agreements if pursued, and proceed toward final plat once conditions—including septic permitting, shared access easements, and any required conservation‑easement documentation—are satisfied.","The county granted preliminary plat approval for the Penwell Bridge Farm minor subdivision, dividing a 160‑acre historic homestead into five lots with the developer and partners aiming to conserve most acreage via a conservation easement and support an adjacent organic dairy and farm operation.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6204259,"Commission grants floodplain variance to allow moved caretaker house to remain after engineering and neighbor support",3862,4551000,8413000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3779144-8233e124e576d3ea0368880ba3ccd3c2&start=4551&end=8413","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3779144-8233e124e576d3ea0368880ba3ccd3c2/thumbnail_4551000.jpg","/articles/6204259/Gallatin-County/Montana/Commission-grants-floodplain-variance-to-allow-moved-caretaker-house-to-remain-after-engineering-and-neighbor-support","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6204259-b201eddfda9178aeb45abef7947789a0/orig.mp4?Expires=1775203101&Signature=VPQAYvkldB~ZKloM94ouGthfbdnRjPonmu6JOaicVEe4il4mRatHimHCv6LHODRB9186KgFzI~luKur6AE4YSE3Tww3IRpFyKqpK3XdSzfxq~TN8LlT7DQ7EIzZql9XMK9OUS~d7mF-36IRaYtMFb63tylSsMN5f6jAnVLaZAk4UNLGg8-Lw~WXs-VkMD-dGQPhtAE6lQeKo9uJYgwcpv~Gm626QaN2DtJ5Wcbv6Mqav96vH55dy3VCSr3cKJRJ8vnq1-Qst4lRgmGDAaiOAyhyu2mq~iJSKKnedBXHS01ry22yqr6ne0nEXq4qvoxrg3Lu00SvXJqr6gDSK4rD-HQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Gallatin County commissioners approved a variance allowing a residential structure that had been moved onto a property east of Belgrade to remain within the regulated floodplain, subject to conditions and a follow‑up floodplain permit that must demonstrate compliance with elevation and encroachment limits.

The property, roughly 23.5 acres and bisected by Highlight Creek, had previously received a conditional use permit for a guest house/caretaker residence conditioned to remain outside the 100‑year floodplain. County floodplain staff later learned, during a septic permitting review, that a structure had been placed within the regulated floodplain without a required floodplain permit.

The applicant requested a variance from Section 7.2.9 of the county’s Floodplain Hazard Management Regulations, which allows the floodplain administrator to issue a permit only when no reasonable alternate location outside the regulated floodplain exists. Floodplain Administrator Sean O’Callaghan’s staff report noted potential buildable locations on both the west and east sides of the property outside the mapped floodplain, but the applicant and neighbors described practical obstacles to using those locations, including structural limits on moving the house across a private bridge and objections from neighbors that would cause “sprawl” and reduce rural clustering.

The applicant team provided a detailed engineering analysis. WWC Engineering’s Scott Dunkelberger said the finished floor elevation of the house is 3.8 feet above the 100‑year base flood elevation derived from a higher‑detail study used for permitting. The engineer presented an encroachment analysis showing the house foundation would increase a cross‑sectional base flood elevation by about 0.04 feet (roughly half an inch), well under the county’s 6‑inch allowance for permitted encroachments. The applicant’s engineer also committed to correct minor elevation details for the crawl space and the proposed garage floor in the floodplain permit application; the garage slab had not been poured at the time of the hearing.

Neighbors and some adjacent landowners spoke in favor of allowing the structure to remain where it is. Multiple neighbors said they had consented earlier to the structure being moved through their properties and that moving the house to alternative sites would reduce the clustered, rural layout envisioned by East Gallatin zoning and could trigger legal objections. Belgrade Planning staff and local residents generally described the structure as tucked into the trees and of limited visual impact.

County counsel explained the statutory authority and the commission’s discretion: without sufficient protest, the commission must consider whether the transfer meets the ordinance’s variance criteria, including whether the variance is the minimum necessary, whether failure to grant would cause exceptional hardship, and whether the variance would increase flood hazards or impede public safety. O’Callaghan recommended conditions that the applicant must meet before a floodplain permit is issued.

After deliberation the commission made affirmative findings on the required variance criteria, including that (1) allowing the structure to remain is the minimum relief necessary in this specific case, (2) denial would impose exceptional hardship on the elderly owners seeking a caretaker arrangement, and (3) with the engineered mitigations and the finished floor elevation the encroachment would not substantially increase flood heights or hazards. The commission approved the variance with conditions requiring the applicant to complete the floodplain permit and satisfy remaining technical items before occupancy.

The decision resolves the immediate enforcement issue but requires the applicant to complete a formal floodplain permitting process and satisfy any additional engineering refinements before occupancy or further construction.

","Gallatin County granted a variance from section 7.2.9 of the Floodplain Hazard Management Regulations to allow a residential structure—moved onto the property without a permit—to remain within the regulated floodplain after staff, the applicant’s engineer, and nearby neighbors presented analysis and commitments to meet permit conditions.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6204264,"Gallatin County approves Journey Church conditional use permit for 29,800‑square‑foot expansion",891,3578000,4469000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3779144-8233e124e576d3ea0368880ba3ccd3c2&start=3578&end=4469","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3779144-8233e124e576d3ea0368880ba3ccd3c2/thumbnail_3578000.jpg","/articles/6204264/Gallatin-County/Montana/Gallatin-County-approves-Journey-Church-conditional-use-permit-for-29800squarefoot-expansion","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6204264-413de558e526e7ab314f4b3b3d98b5c0/orig.mp4?Expires=1775203101&Signature=dBmMhop2D53XYH4ruKvAZzF-KIGYl~vHu2dkQd1V7TyGxY2p4wDC5Nxnl6QUng663Uytck7XYjh5Bq5a10m8D2QWwxEXYHcaUDZVULZxol7hqMcb9Lf08cnyDBALXbr9ZBFJO6LJyjDF5N2tve30JrVLasen0iDOevvAVSOS5-cDMD18wkK2Zs6X8nnUEWXLoG7DZezBeBi8G4eU1mTofYMzdRwJMDdKGn4RvAotQt1J9ZxOPS1e2YxuM26PmIcH0Nw2RV~YaTeRYxxi5wAFhFeN4fZi4j4Rb-OJU9cBkh2l8WtjtOMFCON6bPKnaaZhTHJ622lnYaXBy1oU6owbUQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Gallatin County commissioners on Tuesday approved a conditional use permit (CUP) allowing Journey Church to expand by 29,800 square feet at its 1794 Baxter Lane campus in the 4‑Corners area, a project the county planning staff said will expand existing community services without materially changing traffic or neighborhood character.

Planner Haley Heiner presented the staff report and recommended approval. Heiner said the 40‑acre site lies in the rural residential and agricultural subdistrict of the 4‑Corners zoning district and is connected to the 4‑Corners Water and Sewer District. Public notices were published May 24 and 31, and certified mail notices were sent to adjacent property owners; staff reported no public comments were received during the notice period.

Heiner explained Journey Church previously obtained approvals for a place of worship, a daycare (2023 CUP), and a special‑events facility (after‑the‑fact CUP for up to 1,000 people). The current expansion is intended primarily to give existing childcare operations more indoor space: the church’s representative said existing classrooms are “crammed” and that the addition is designed to improve space for children rather than increase auditorium capacity. The representative added that the YMCA leases eight acres of the site under a nominal lease and that the expansion will not change the daycare’s existing drop‑off/pick‑up configuration.

Staff found the proposal consistent with the Gallatin County growth policy, the 4‑Corners community plan, and applicable zoning regulations and recommended conditions of approval in the staff report. Commissioners reviewed traffic and utility comments from county departments and the 4‑Corners Water and Sewer District; County Road and Bridge had no concerns with the proposed expansion.

After no public comment, a commissioner moved to approve the CUP, adopting the staff report findings and recommended conditions. Commissioners praised the project as a community hub that provides daycare capacity and partners with the YMCA. The motion passed by voice vote.

The approval allows the church to proceed with the building expansion under the conditions listed in the planning staff report. Heiner noted that any proposal to increase the existing special‑events capacity above the previously permitted 1,000 would require a separate CUP modification.","The county approved a conditional use permit allowing Journey Church to add 29,800 square feet to its existing facility at 1794 Baxter Lane in the 4‑Corners area to expand childcare space; staff said the project meets zoning, water/sewer, and traffic requirements and received no public opposition in the advertised notice period.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Commission approves annexation of 4-Corners parcel from Gallatin Gateway to Central Valley Fire District amid neighbors’ concerns

Gallatin County approves $19.28 million Spanish Peaks rural improvement district bonds to fund Big Sky fire station

Commission approves Penwell Bridge Farm five‑lot preliminary plat to support conservation and agricultural transition

Commission grants floodplain variance to allow moved caretaker house to remain after engineering and neighbor support

Gallatin County approves Journey Church conditional use permit for 29,800‑square‑foot expansion