The Portland Board of Public Education convened on June 10, 2025, to discuss a proposed cell phone policy that has sparked significant debate among students, educators, and community members. The meeting featured a series of public comments highlighting various perspectives on the implications of the policy.

The primary concern raised by several speakers was the potential negative impact of a "bell to bell" ban on cell phone use. Critics argued that such a policy mirrors outdated zero-tolerance approaches and could foster a culture of fear and shame rather than promoting a safe and healthy learning environment. One speaker emphasized that the ban could disproportionately affect marginalized students, particularly those who are economically disadvantaged or part of the LGBTQ community, by limiting their access to necessary communication and support networks during school hours.

August Chandler, a student and member of Portland Outright, articulated that while he recognizes the challenges teachers face in managing phone use, the proposed policy's punitive nature could hinder student autonomy and safety. He suggested that a more flexible approach, allowing students to access their phones during free periods, would better serve their needs without compromising classroom focus.

Matthew Hosmer, a teacher at Casaway High School, drew parallels between the current cell phone debate and historical efforts to ban smoking in schools, arguing that protecting students from addictive technologies is essential. He advocated for a complete ban on phone use during school hours to mitigate distractions and promote better focus among students.

In contrast, some students, like Mona Woodford, proposed alternative solutions that would accommodate individual needs rather than enforcing a blanket ban. Woodford highlighted the importance of considering students with specific accommodations, suggesting that the policy should be revised to allow for more nuanced access to technology.

The meeting concluded with a call for further discussion and revision of the proposed policy, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that respects student agency while addressing the challenges posed by technology in educational settings. The board is expected to consider these perspectives as they move forward with policy development.