Matthews Board debates nonprofit control over Stumptown Park events funding

In the heart of Matthews, North Carolina, the Board of Commissioners convened for a budget workshop on June 11, 2025, where discussions took a deep dive into the future of community events and the management of tourism funds. The atmosphere was charged with concern as commissioners grappled with the implications of potentially transferring event management responsibilities to a nonprofit organization.

One commissioner raised a critical point about the risks associated with setting arbitrary fees for events held in town facilities, particularly Stumptown Park. The fear was that a future board could impose exorbitant charges, effectively redirecting tourism funds into the general fund and limiting access to cultural events. “What is to stop a future board from charging $60,000 for a single day at Stumptown Park?” they questioned, highlighting the potential for misuse of funds and the impact on community engagement.

In response, another commissioner emphasized the importance of uniformity in fee structures, arguing that charging all users the same amount would prevent favoritism and ensure fairness. However, this approach raised concerns about accessibility, as high fees could deter community events that enrich local culture.

The conversation shifted to the role of the Matthews Alive nonprofit, which has been pivotal in organizing local events. One commissioner suggested that this organization could take over event management, leveraging its expertise to enhance community offerings. Yet, skepticism lingered about whether this nonprofit was equipped to handle additional responsibilities, with some board members expressing doubts about the feasibility of such a transition in the current budget cycle.

As discussions unfolded, the notion of using tourism funds to support nonprofit activities sparked a debate about transparency and accountability. One commissioner likened the proposed funding strategy to “money laundering,” suggesting that it felt disingenuous to reallocate funds in a way that obscured their original purpose.

The meeting concluded with a commitment to further explore these ideas, with plans for a presentation on the 23rd to address lingering questions. As the board navigates these complex issues, the future of Matthews’ community events hangs in the balance, reflecting broader concerns about funding, accessibility, and the role of local governance in fostering a vibrant cultural landscape.