[{"_1":2,"_122":-5,"_123":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,110],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6202107,"mediaKeyId","3787801-7f5b097a2a259d787c3549044bfa1cd0","parentId",3787801,"title","Board reviews inquiry from Denise Bolton for alternate seat; residency needs verification","audioSeconds",130,"startMs",1006000,"endMs",1136000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3787801-7f5b097a2a259d787c3549044bfa1cd0&start=1006&end=1136","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3787801-7f5b097a2a259d787c3549044bfa1cd0/thumbnail_1006000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6202107/Woodstock/Grafton-County/New-Hampshire/Board-reviews-inquiry-from-Denise-Bolton-for-alternate-seat-residency-needs-verification","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6202107-889f46c207d1a7af9cf09b247daa9507/orig.mp4?Expires=1771185188&Signature=d7oMaFOFr1ppyjw4I0kbvqRghvNWagIhidoLmlpkNUgJyLZsHTa2pPGLyfemW6MyXurkD4jQaHnTxy55NPHoniPtGfh6cqf-FJdmbCJPbJS6kX9P9rs2CnF7APtG1FYRNyVL9IQYrFmf-FqRBrORrNo2suI3LzOnrB4QG0ianGrQDsMfzWhZU36QVwutREmAw5whw5G47hpq3gjzArRpOhLSCLk3vn5BbEZbF6uRJGuUVz35L3Q4NPWeuiwudBhGNuQUZy9EZ2I8Wq4uHEqObQJHt~dfo2dXY53gDwrzZ8z0B4DNRwLBVfFhhkgrsfaUulDRIq3~tiIPzZrUsdvQNQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Town Council of Woodstock NH","date","2025-06-13T00:58:18.623Z","article","The Woodstock Planning Board said it received an inquiry from Denise Bolton about serving as a planning-board alternate and invited members to meet the candidate, but they asked staff to verify her residency before making an appointment.

Board members noted that an email inquiry listed “Denise Bolton” (also referenced in the meeting as Denise Bolton Barry) and that her listing appeared to show an out-of-town company address. One member said, “She says she lives here, but it has to be a resident. Registered,” and members asked staff to confirm whether she is a resident and a registered voter (or otherwise qualified) before placing her on the board.

No formal nomination or vote occurred at the meeting. Board members said they had not received other alternate inquiries at that time.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Planning Board Meeting, June 9, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The planning board received an inquiry from Denise Bolton about serving as an alternate. Members asked staff to verify whether she is a Woodstock resident and registered as required before moving forward.","taxTitle","Woodstock, Grafton County, New Hampshire","taxId",68297,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6202112,"Resident developer Dana Mills invited to informally present possible gravel-pit plan in Rock Village area",126,737000,863000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3787801-7f5b097a2a259d787c3549044bfa1cd0&start=737&end=863","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3787801-7f5b097a2a259d787c3549044bfa1cd0/thumbnail_737000.jpg","/articles/6202112/Woodstock/Grafton-County/New-Hampshire/Resident-developer-Dana-Mills-invited-to-informally-present-possible-gravel-pit-plan-in-Rock-Village-area","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6202112-cc59fe2e8e46c91165f987f6d7c09e34/orig.mp4?Expires=1771185188&Signature=PrZD8LqylpAHwznGZ~IxuSPB11OzV3FTKnstdp2pYl2kuZPSViZBuzBkB7Ml22zdrclu~8gNcgNa5iGB4-6Gs9ujP-PApkmM0DiC36EjNECC6OUL4R3f8FsmFkbOzsy8-XJEzg1YKz1jx2VhGAQt3oaO2jO5EZh8sw0oCfTeLr3QcpDzNN6ACj4VyD~3DdgaAw~EdacItySwQPqP704xWArivwFGmTvf6-EHat2vaHtmiQuzol7CWaUCF3KQbMqAphtNyMvK1Ow~Y8VNaeTAxn---3ytLvi5jEBb3sB0SWvxDvMVodMraHgBmCktbx2lqda~Hj3eRBj5B03zhYhdxg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Planning board members said developer Dana Mills contacted them about possible development on a roughly 30-acre parcel near Rock Village and that they invited him to an informational planning-board meeting to discuss options.

A board member described the property location—near the former farmhouse and a former driving-range site—and said the land has deep slopes and development constraints. The member said Mills “still owns it” and is considering a small-scale plan of “3 or 4 houses” rather than a large subdivision. The member also said Mills paid a substantial mitigation amount in the past when earlier larger development was proposed; the transcript reports a mitigation payment of \"$3,060,000\" related to prior work on roads.

Board members said Mills would be asked to come to a planning-board informational session “before you make any plans” so members can identify issues and constraints. No formal application, vote, or staff report on the property was presented at the meeting.","Dana Mills contacted the board about a possible gravel pit or small development on a 30-acre parcel near Rock Village; the board invited him to present informally so members can review constraints and options.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6202117,"Board discusses telecom tower waiver without expiration; members urge time limits on waivers",41,650000,691000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3787801-7f5b097a2a259d787c3549044bfa1cd0&start=650&end=691","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3787801-7f5b097a2a259d787c3549044bfa1cd0/thumbnail_650000.jpg","/articles/6202117/Woodstock/Grafton-County/New-Hampshire/Board-discusses-telecom-tower-waiver-without-expiration-members-urge-time-limits-on-waivers","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6202117-488affb03408726c7b3675f467b6860d/orig.mp4?Expires=1771185188&Signature=OugDv~r9cjKcpYWVAdAj4lZBAj5m1pfw80t2KUe9GpTA-V5DeCcuYJOyoVOLWg7LuYMA-u1iei2hpj7RJmyPyurnMuWDSen0d9fTSrusZVihIWo9z5bfaDsIwfvluWoSuGOnVPvaEVs2uUKCL0~YL5owizOISny3Dg8mjK9Yk4wwdf1HWPBXJZeZj5DCW7unbpEd~v6hU2r~QGQYqca6mUSPjfQBMlYAa~bTkIGe4jzOA5z4yCpaxH7shAP~2t47bbWZzHPUoyCgpjFUfdxmgBxaYH9cugWGebfekaM8u1jlbTGgHyZCI1ENkiMM~8qho4HhyI~e1GnKPOzcoyJ-KQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Planning board members flagged that waivers for telecommunication projects sometimes lack expiration dates and said the board should require time limits on future waivers.

One member asked whether a permit for a tower would expire and said, “Our waiver does not have an expiration. That's one of my problems with it. It's that our waivers need to have expirations, because it's into perpetuity.” Another member noted a prior case on Stone Dam Road where a cell tower project began but was not completed before a permit expired; after a new ordinance took effect the applicant had to reapply.

Board members discussed adding timelines to waivers and agreed the town should consider placing explicit expirations on approvals to avoid indefinite authorizations. There was no formal motion or amendment recorded at the meeting to change the waiver policy or ordinance; members suggested follow-up work, including potential ordinance review by a committee.

The transcript does not cite a specific ordinance number or statutory citation; references were to “the new ordinance” and to the town's waiver practice.","Members raised concerns that a waiver for a telecommunication tower lacks an expiration date and discussed ordinance timelines after a past building-permit lapse on a cell tower project.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":90,"_43":102,"_45":103,"_47":104,"_49":105,"_51":106,"_53":107,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":108,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":109,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6202121,"Route 3 drainage, Morris Street waterline and wastewater staffing updates discussed",322000,363000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3787801-7f5b097a2a259d787c3549044bfa1cd0&start=322&end=363","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3787801-7f5b097a2a259d787c3549044bfa1cd0/thumbnail_322000.jpg","/articles/6202121/Woodstock/Grafton-County/New-Hampshire/Route-3-drainage-Morris-Street-waterline-and-wastewater-staffing-updates-discussed","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6202121-a549be9c1a6d5eb5d78e5f3174af7aa4/orig.mp4?Expires=1771185188&Signature=bgmojrVKZpMGN3uE7corJ6fP9xfblFYzR9LCI2lPtlpMsVQywIiXX4WZJnztkcPo~daG7~P39MUctnAh16xJv~FIR4JE-XRQKayJfpu857VdbSpJqnmGH8Xww1xbcn1utt4G5SdbnLHBZXAPb89u9AqCFeYJLiFvER~j~snajZsvKC0b29xBTqXxptw-cZ-lH-jObjrHLmV-q5QIJxHxsMf~bFTuuW-oyEMqllWWDnTJ~ewd7PgiPT94NKDyAtUVBlPAx~WUCqT2IUsEsxkuJU52lRoVohBKbw6gfEKQA9FmaqkfWxTKHltXxFRBLjva3BwedXzsvuHCSuH8qJVAnA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Planning board members gave updates on several local infrastructure projects, including Route 3 drainage and sidewalk work, an approved Morris Street waterline project, and staffing for wastewater treatment operations.

A board member reported that the Route 3 project is “coming along” and said the work will replace drainage and sidewalks with features described as larger than expected. The same speaker said the Morris Street waterline project finally received approvals and that the town plans to do the work in early September to avoid summer disruption.

On wastewater, a board member said the town is hiring to support the wastewater treatment plant and noted recent energy improvements at the plant. The transcript does not provide job titles or specific hiring timelines.

No formal votes or funding allocations were recorded at the meeting for these projects. Board members signaled ongoing implementation tasks and coordination with contractors and staff, but the transcript does not specify contract awards, budgets, or precise construction start dates beyond an intention to schedule Morris Street later in the summer.","Board members reported progress on a Route 3 drainage and sidewalk replacement project, a Morris Street waterline that has approvals and will be scheduled later in the year, and efforts to hire staff for wastewater treatment and related energy improvements.",{"_33":111,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":112,"_41":113,"_43":114,"_45":115,"_47":116,"_49":117,"_51":118,"_53":119,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":120,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":121,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6202126,"Applicant asks to continue Maryland Grove/Mirror Lake subdivision hearing; board does not open item",196,54000,250000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3787801-7f5b097a2a259d787c3549044bfa1cd0&start=54&end=250","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3787801-7f5b097a2a259d787c3549044bfa1cd0/thumbnail_54000.jpg","/articles/6202126/Woodstock/Grafton-County/New-Hampshire/Applicant-asks-to-continue-Maryland-GroveMirror-Lake-subdivision-hearing-board-does-not-open-item","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6202126-1cf74981056501f18d60a643a52b29d3/orig.mp4?Expires=1771185188&Signature=R2M52Tv3ngP2CDR~n4OHjtRCFgPD1RXye5OYWB8g1YdEirTU4KChXKkfXSpuWSFR5N92Zx2vZkDeiDYldTJ1e3nRZfiyw0NABn2nsDKBZSjveBrKja305HWTCjPsP22Lmig75aKnvme2PfvesE5WmUjX5pAfnHchI2fE2IYx6Cc1HV-58SGUj4G~V9r5u3go9~chyn1YGD0xNlss5RksyY6XzTkr856cmcFVLEL2Q0dBubahI8-8evOsCmYtOjJlT1qv7H~yZG-tYbITJxq023MqABSD~WmE2Oue~iec3LUdHa3-O0VczxwBpPkyOBOdDzdwEUel-k0w2ThBdEWWHA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Woodstock Planning Board announced it would not open the public hearing on the Maryland Grove (Mirror Lake) subdivision after the applicant’s representative requested a continuance.

The board chair (unnamed) said the applicant’s representative, Bailey Clamont, communicated that “they wanted to continue the hearing, but they weren't ready to proceed tonight.” The chair said the board received a progress plan dated May 28 but that it was unclear whether that plan would be the one the applicant intended the board to use.

Board members said they would not open the hearing and would continue it to a future date to be determined. The chair explained, “the applicant isn't here, so we are not going to have discussion or open a meeting tonight,” and repeated that decision later in the meeting for anyone who had joined remotely.

The board did not take any formal action on the subdivision at the meeting; no votes or staff presentations occurred for this item. The transcript records receipt of a progress plan on May 28 and an earlier filing on May 30 but does not state a new hearing date.

Board members and staff indicated they expect the matter to return to a future agenda once the applicant indicates readiness. The board’s announcement left the timing and any additional materials the applicant must provide unspecified.","The Woodstock Planning Board received a request from the applicant's representative to continue the Maryland Grove/Mirror Lake subdivision hearing; the board announced it would not open discussion and left a new date to be determined.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Board reviews inquiry from Denise Bolton for alternate seat; residency needs verification

Resident developer Dana Mills invited to informally present possible gravel-pit plan in Rock Village area

Board discusses telecom tower waiver without expiration; members urge time limits on waivers

Route 3 drainage, Morris Street waterline and wastewater staffing updates discussed

Applicant asks to continue Maryland Grove/Mirror Lake subdivision hearing; board does not open item