Loudoun supervisors discuss Shreve Mill relocation and multifamily project specifics

The Loudoun County Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on June 11, 2025, to discuss several key agenda items, primarily focused on a proposed development application concerning the relocation of Shreve Mill and associated infrastructure improvements.

The meeting commenced with a presentation regarding the applicant's plans for the Shreve Mill area. Supervisor Kroening inquired about the specifics of the road improvements, confirming that the applicant is responsible for the four-laning of Cross Veil and Evergreen Mills Road from Hoagland Mill Road to Shreve Mill. It was noted that these improvements are not currently included in the county's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) but are part of the Countywide Transportation Plan (CTP).

Discussion then shifted to the proposed 22 live-work units within the development. Concerns were raised about their alignment with the 2019 General Plan, particularly regarding affordability. Staff confirmed that only two of the proposed units would be classified as attainable, meeting the minimum requirements set by the zoning ordinance.

Supervisor Letourneau requested a comparison of proffers and commitments between this application and the nearby Village at Clear Springs. Staff indicated that the current application does not offer the same level of parkland dedication or transportation improvements, suggesting a lighter impact compared to the previous development.

Supervisor Kershner expressed concerns about the density of the proposed development, noting that it is less dense than the Village at Clear Springs. Staff reassured that they are comfortable with the proposed density, although some supervisors voiced apprehension regarding the number of homes planned.

The preservation of the historic Greenfield House was another significant topic. Staff recommended that measures be taken to protect this structure, which has been largely excluded from the current application. The board discussed the need for a commitment from the applicant regarding the future of the manor house, with suggestions ranging from full rehabilitation to basic preservation efforts.

The meeting also addressed the open space requirements for the development. The applicant proposed approximately 48% of the site as open space, slightly below the recommended 50%. Staff confirmed that much of this space would be usable, including community gardens and park areas.

As the discussion progressed, concerns were raised about the placement of affordable housing units within the development, with some supervisors expressing discomfort about their location away from community amenities.

In conclusion, the public hearing highlighted various aspects of the proposed development, including infrastructure improvements, housing density, historic preservation, and open space requirements. The board will continue to evaluate the application and seek further information from the applicant regarding outstanding concerns before making a final decision.