Board approves rulemaking process despite California Medical Association's objections

The California State Board of Optometry convened on June 9, 2025, to discuss significant regulatory changes impacting the practice of optometry in the state. The meeting highlighted the board's commitment to ensuring that its regulations align with legal standards and the evolving landscape of medical technology.

A key discussion point arose from member Klepa, who praised the legal input provided in the meeting materials. This input, which referenced two relevant cases, was seen as crucial in validating the board's position on proposed regulations. Klepa's acknowledgment underscored the importance of legal backing in the board's decision-making process, suggesting that the proposed changes could be safely adopted.

Following this, a motion was made to adopt the proposed responses to comments on the modified text of the regulations. The motion included instructions for the executive officer to finalize the rule-making process and make any necessary technical adjustments. This procedural step is vital as it indicates the board's readiness to move forward with implementing new regulations that could significantly affect optometric practices.

Public comments were solicited, but participation was minimal. Lucas Evanston, representing the California Medical Association, voiced concerns regarding the use of radiofrequency (RF) technology in optometry. He argued that RF technology alters tissue and should be classified as surgery under the California Optometry Practice Act, thus falling outside the scope of optometry. This perspective highlights ongoing debates about the boundaries of optometric practice and the implications of new technologies.

Despite the concerns raised, the board proceeded with a roll call vote, resulting in unanimous approval of the motion to adopt the proposed regulations. This decision marks a pivotal moment for the board as it navigates the complexities of modern medical practices while ensuring compliance with state laws.

In conclusion, the meeting underscored the board's proactive approach to regulatory updates, balancing legal considerations with advancements in optometry. As the board moves forward, the implications of these regulations will be closely monitored, particularly in relation to emerging technologies and their classification within the field.