Costa Mesa planning commission approves low-income housing project with community benefits

The Costa Mesa Planning Commission convened on June 9, 2025, to discuss significant developments in the city, focusing on a proposed housing project and its associated development agreement. The meeting began with public comments, where concerns were raised about the lengthy duration of the development agreement, which spans 20 years with two five-year extensions. A speaker highlighted that such terms are uncommon, noting that cities like Los Angeles and Newport typically offer much shorter timelines. The speaker urged the commission to consider shorter terms and immediate fee payments to avoid acting as a "developer's banker."

Following public comments, the commission moved to discuss the housing project, which aims to provide 105 low-income units among a total of 50 units. Commissioner Martinez expressed strong support for the project, emphasizing its alignment with the city’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (IHO) and the addition of open spaces and public art. He praised the project's all-electric design and its potential to enhance air quality.

Commissioner Dixon echoed support, acknowledging the project's suitability for the area and its adequate parking provisions. He noted the pressing need for quality housing in Costa Mesa, particularly for middle-class residents such as teachers and firefighters.

Vice Chair Zick commended the project’s design and amenities but raised concerns about the lack of adequate planning for the surrounding community, particularly regarding parks and schools. He expressed a desire for more community benefits that genuinely serve the residents rather than merely marketing terms.

The commission discussed the public benefits outlined in the development agreement, with some members advocating for clearer specifications on how funds would be allocated for community services. A motion was made to approve the project, with an amendment to clarify that the allocation of funds should be explicitly defined in the development agreement to prevent future misinterpretations.

Ultimately, the commission voted to support the project, recognizing its potential to contribute positively to the community while also acknowledging the need for ongoing discussions about planning and community infrastructure in the area. The meeting concluded with a commitment to further refine the development agreement before it is presented to the city council for final approval.