[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6639277,"mediaKeyId","3802001-f07493d23075df9b6ed8eb8e56d6ae1f","parentId",3802001,"title","CB2 SLA committee reviews several restaurant license alterations; small stipulations and documentation requested","audioSeconds",2748,"startMs",108000,"endMs",2856000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3802001-f07493d23075df9b6ed8eb8e56d6ae1f&start=108&end=2856","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3802001-f07493d23075df9b6ed8eb8e56d6ae1f/thumbnail_108000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6639277/Manhattan-City/New-York-County/New-York/CB2-SLA-committee-reviews-several-restaurant-license-alterations-small-stipulations-and-documentation-requested","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6639277-99df8939660e683b158fd199e2e642a5/orig.mp4?Expires=1771183277&Signature=E0Zq1-ahDmmH1jjzyfHj0S~4TkLP-9k8NFADamLzNdbz0JMoVZXbvD9Zl9ZJIfyL~tjo3VYotjre4AN64RXueSraTyT-mbWYg5ZUeXHXqtWLJGxYr4rNLKltDfQ8VM2kNttffY~SrKJ~~CtBqzrRZ6G7SOnLsNOGVcNkF~rzTdqzpnCzjewCxWyMxHevpMyqJ3xVuaeUQlAUCwXREWUjNf67vWA8dtqCB9Cp~fcNP-71TqTMnIPYjMW5-S2~vAPLivtoU71hk4PbbSgHRoxElSA2VmDj~6QxxQnAkcexcZfihJMcLNC9rxyI6tIeDOqwPniXnVgsIkVdAE7BtSl2Tw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Manhattan, NY","date","2025-06-10T13:15:47.187Z","article","Manhattan Community Board 2’s SLA committee heard a batch of restaurant licensing applications and asked applicants to supply clarifying diagrams, agree to standard neighborhood stipulations and confirm hours and private‑party limits.

Why it matters: The committee reviewed multiple on‑premise applications that, taken together, shape neighborhood restaurant operations and hours. Several applicants agreed to small stipulations the committee uses to protect pedestrian access and limit late‑night disturbance.

Selected applications and committee requests or applicant responses:
- Kennedy Organics LLC doing business as Charlie Bird (5 King Street): Ben Savitsky, attorney for the applicant, said the requested alteration is a change in method of operation to open earlier on weekdays (moving opening times earlier by roughly an hour). The applicant stated “Everything else is remaining exactly the same.” The committee provided updated stipulation forms to the applicant to sign.
- Shosh (41 Greenwich Avenue): The owner described Shosh as a plant‑based restaurant that opened last September and is applying to upgrade from beer and wine to a full liquor license. The owner said operations are reservation‑only, hours are roughly 5 p.m. to 11 p.m. daily (midnight permitted on Friday and Saturday), no outdoor seating, background music only, and private parties limited to about 10–12 per year; the committee requested the applicant submit an updated stipulation reflecting no more than 12 private parties per year.
- Kosaka (220 West 13th Street): Benjamin Korngutt, attorney for the applicant, said the Omakase‑only restaurant operates with 18 seats inside and would like to change from beer and wine to liquor; the applicant said the new proposed closing time is 11 p.m. The committee had no outstanding objections but asked for a corrected seating diagram showing interior seats.
- WS F and B LLC (restaurant space at the Washington Square Hotel): Phil Dorn, attorney for the applicants, said the restaurant and the hotel have separate liquor licenses; the restaurant space would remain fundamentally the same with no outdoor seating, a midnight closing time, and no live music. The applicants agreed to a private‑party cap of 24 for whole‑space buyouts in committee discussion.
- Dean’s (213 Sixth Avenue): Neil Visaki, representing the applicants, described a small British cuisine restaurant with about 20–24 seats, no outdoor seating planned now, and a 12 a.m. closing time. The committee asked that any operable windows be closed at 10 p.m.; the applicants agreed.
- On the Corner / Mary Lane (99 Bank Street): The applicant requested a roadbed seating alteration (11 tables, 22 seats). Committee members asked the applicant to remove one table to ensure ADA access and noted other stipulations (no host stands, no sandwich boards) that would be included in the stipulation form.

Other procedural items: The committee waived appearances on a number of applications and asked applicants to submit updated diagrams where the architectural renderings omitted interior seating. Staff said stipulation forms would be sent by email after the meeting and that applicants must notarize and return them.

What the committee will follow up on: Updated seating diagrams (to confirm interior seats when outdoor seating is proposed), explicit stipulations limiting private parties where agreed, and any ADA/access fixes such as removing one table to preserve an accessible path. No formal roll‑call votes are recorded in the publicly available excerpt; business‑session items and final recommendations were to be handled after the public testimony portion.

Provenance: The committee introduced Charlie Bird and several other applicants early in the meeting (transcript excerpt: “So the application I'm going to call is Kennedy Organics doing business as Charlie Bird at 5 King Street”) and the set of applications and stipulations were discussed across a series of applicant presentations that follow in the transcript.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Manhattan CB2 June 5, 2025 - SLA 2 Committee Meeting","oneSentenceSummary","Manhattan Community Board 2’s SLA committee reviewed multiple restaurant license alterations and asked applicants to provide corrected seating diagrams and sign standard neighborhood stipulations limiting private parties and preserving ADA access.","taxTitle","Manhattan City, New York County, New York","taxId",3586,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6639282,"Neighbors press Community Board 2 to seek SLA enforcement and deny outdoor privileges for Boucherie and Olio after repeated noncompliance",1238,2957000,4195000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3802001-f07493d23075df9b6ed8eb8e56d6ae1f&start=2957&end=4195","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3802001-f07493d23075df9b6ed8eb8e56d6ae1f/thumbnail_2957000.jpg","/articles/6639282/Manhattan-City/New-York-County/New-York/Neighbors-press-Community-Board-2-to-seek-SLA-enforcement-and-deny-outdoor-privileges-for-Boucherie-and-Olio-after-repeated-noncompliance","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6639282-3e116a2821e264b3988a225a27ca734d/orig.mp4?Expires=1771183277&Signature=WkziWR9r~CjfzjKr8CsAbGXJRrS47i5MBZI1Cxs8SR58O~V2KJmV7sjDgdjQ3p-HiC14JT0ulzKvtfwIi5U8iAXp1j-yMQ~DxsbNUHPl5CgWc20gxMktI9SOfbak4O~A8nSdV818qQpLKciDPWGNrAP2Qr~P7hSq3SvBXak9RRSmdjt8sU214sJjpfBUQi9xiKC~pyhj2PxHHvXRdtHLx3gNQkawy0TpJizxKUpqvADp2-qeviuUdkzOC0qcsL6pUp05wiapSgWMMDrmBseOX4D4nmDlkgzkHSDRTfuZN1Iai565-Y991r3PYAN46vFcTD1TN8RHjfVKBgeZsRmd0Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Neighborhood residents urged Manhattan Community Board 2 to press for enforcement and tighter conditions on sidewalk and roadway cafes run by the same operators along Seventh Avenue South and Greenwich Avenue, saying repeated violations have blocked pedestrian access and undermined trust in the outdoor‑dining rules.

Why it matters: Residents described persistent noncompliance with Department of Transportation (DOT) and Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA) requirements for sidewalk cafes — including planters and furniture that encroach into the required 10‑foot pedestrian zone, sandwich boards in walkways, and servers delivering food and drink from the sidewalk rather than servicing patrons from inside the restaurant — and said recent DOT enforcement had removed planters but the behavior resumed.

Details from the meeting: Ben Savitsky (attorney for the applicant) described the Boucherie sidewalk cafe application as “34 tables with 68 seats. It is 9 feet by 8 inches wide and 44 feet long,” and said DOT had inspected and that the applicants believed the configuration met clearance requirements. The restaurant representative on the record at the meeting was Jasmine Palomik.

Multiple residents contradicted that account based on repeated observations. Susan Ginsberg, a neighbor, told the committee, “I would just say these people have no credibility whatsoever,” and said DOT had confirmed the Petit Boucherie location did not apply to the city’s dining‑program rules and that enforcement visits and summonses were planned. Nancy Paisley, who lives across from one of the locations, told the committee that planters previously taken by DOT “were back down” and that customers were forced to walk in the street where the sidewalk was obstructed.

Augustine Hope of the West Village Residence Association urged denial unless the operators prove sustained compliance; another committee member, Carter, suggested forwarding the documented violations to the New York State Liquor Authority because local violations can form the basis for SLA enforcement. Community commenters handed photographs and DOT correspondence to the committee as evidence of continuing obstruction.

Olio and Boucherie specifics the committee discussed include:
- Boucherie (979 Seventh Avenue South): application for a municipal sidewalk expansion that would occupy the full restaurant frontage; DOT had inspected but residents presented photographs showing planters and a sandwich board encroaching into the pedestrian zone. Committee members noted prior DOT action in which planters were confiscated after an encroachment notice was issued to the property owner.
- Olio (3 Greenwich Avenue): the application requests a sidewalk cafe with 27 tables and 60 seats and a roadway cafe with eight tables and 17 seats. Residents and committee members raised concerns about planters placed at the curb edge and servers accessing and serving from the sidewalk rather than operating from inside.

Committee disposition and next steps: Committee members signaled strong concern and discussed recommending denial or, at minimum, forwarding the violations to the SLA and requesting DOT enforcement. One committee member said the board could recommend that the SLA consider character‑and‑fitness for the operator because the same ownership group has a documented history of noncompliance across multiple premises. Members emphasized they would require clear corrective steps before considering approval of outdoor privileges and asked staff to prepare language for a resolution; they also stated a consistent community request that outdoor seating close by 10 p.m.

What residents want: Consistent enforcement, removal of obstructions from the 10‑foot pedestrian zone, elimination of sandwich boards and unauthorized host stands on the sidewalk, and a strict requirement that outdoor service is accessed only from the interior to preserve pedestrian access.

Provenance: The Boucherie presentation and the extensive public testimony begin with the applicant’s introduction (transcript excerpt: “This is Bouchary LLC. They do business as Bouchary at 9799 Seventh Avenue South. … It is 34 tables with 68 seats.”) and the public comments continue through a large block of neighborhood testimony and committee discussion that followed (transcript excerpts of resident testimony describing DOT action, photographs, and requests for SLA referral).","Residents told the SLA committee that two high‑profile sidewalk/roadway cafe applications — Boucherie and Olio — have repeatedly obstructed the pedestrian zone and urged the committee to seek SLA enforcement and deny or restrict outdoor privileges.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6639286,"Community board seeks on‑site ADA bathroom before Atlantico Bineo serves alcohol, asks outdoor closing at 10 p.m.",1247,906000,2153000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3802001-f07493d23075df9b6ed8eb8e56d6ae1f&start=906&end=2153","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3802001-f07493d23075df9b6ed8eb8e56d6ae1f/thumbnail_906000.jpg","/articles/6639286/Manhattan-City/New-York-County/New-York/Community-board-seeks-onsite-ADA-bathroom-before-Atlantico-Bineo-serves-alcohol-asks-outdoor-closing-at-10-pm","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6639286-107e23cd8702354b1e01386664126547/orig.mp4?Expires=1771183277&Signature=QsrSekF~vH6xhRSgk5XndOFDQQMXKLy9rvBymArRUezmqorjL82YUQky3NgRbN7KPKMEMayN4tFbb5LSa~3xvXGmptaCY-XFk9B4MelQwhuJq5LmhGi5C2~ZSrkTGA8LtRxZVs2P0VULpcmpxxs93Onk7EH6LTT4zij54LHDz8HRFOeJQvUXoYqR9tPTLf1emx2d19sc05bFvpRXoHTw-NzpnvoilayiUYOBA1nez2sf7nsUVpuzTHPJ13Gvj~ioCDkPRLKP17v8S01VMu3zFaS0O6jBB9qdoBRGh8T~IQn06xepF4L9bOgCnvPU8KWUNL~nQJo8af4PBjiKD8WeUw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Manhattan Community Board 2’s State Liquor Authority (SLA) committee pressed Atlantico Bineo, a tavern wine license applicant at 89 Seventh Avenue South, to install an on‑site, ADA‑compliant bathroom before serving alcohol and asked the applicant to limit outdoor seating hours to 10 p.m.

Why it matters: Committee members and many neighbors said the proposal’s existing restroom arrangement — which required patrons to use a bathroom located off the premises in a residential entry and cellar — creates public‑safety and accessibility concerns and could jeopardize compliance with SLA and city licensing rules.

Calum Dilsons, the attorney representing the applicant, told the committee the application had been revised since the prior submission and that the latest plans show an ADA bathroom inside the premises. He said a temporary retail permit had been issued by the SLA and that plans for the bathroom and any roadway or DOT approvals would be submitted to the relevant city agencies, including Landmarks and DOT. Roberto, identified in the meeting as the restaurant’s director of operations for New York, confirmed the location change in the packet sent to the committee.

Committee members and public speakers pressed for specific milestones and timing. One committee member said she wanted a diagram that showed the interior seating rather than relying on the questionnaire; Dilsons said the architectural rendering initially omitted seats but that the applicants would provide an updated diagram. The applicants estimated roughly a month and a half for bathroom construction once DOB and Landmarks approvals were secured.

Neighborhood residents urged stricter conditions. Nancy Paisley, a Barrow Street resident, told the committee the off‑site restroom originally proposed required patrons to walk “out the door, down the steps, down the street, around the corner, into the other building, through the residential corridor, down the basement,” and said she would ask the committee to recommend denial until a bathroom was in place. Multiple speakers insisted that outdoor seating should close at 10 p.m.; one resident noted that nearby outdoor dining typically ends earlier and urged parity.

Committee disposition: During discussion near the end of the public testimony, the committee chair, Donna (CB2 SLA committee chair), said she was “hearing somewhat of a consensus about the getting the bathroom situation solved and until then, not having the alcohol service.” Members also signaled willingness to ask applicants to stipulate that outdoor seating will close at 10 p.m. and that alcohol service will not resume until the on‑site, ADA‑compliant bathroom is completed and approved by the relevant agencies.

What’s next: The applicants agreed to return with updated plans and to take the committee’s concerns to ownership. The committee indicated it would address final hours and stipulations during its business session and communicate any required stipulations to the SLA. No formal vote was recorded in the public transcript excerpt; committee staff said they would follow up in the business session and send stipulation forms to the applicant.

Provenance: The application and the committee’s discussion begin when the applicant was introduced to the committee (transcript excerpt: \"a b seventh Avenue LLC doing business at Atlantico Bineo. 89 Seventh Avenue South. This is a tavern wine license.\") and the committee’s consensus language appears later in the meeting when the chair summarized next steps (transcript excerpt: \"I'm hearing somewhat of a consensus about the getting the bathroom situation solved and until then, not having the alcohol service.\").","Neighbors and Community Board 2 questioned Atlantico Bineo’s plan for a toilet off‑site and pressed the applicant to agree not to serve alcohol until an on‑site, ADA‑compliant bathroom is installed; committee members indicated a consensus to require the change and to limit outdoor hours to 10 p.m.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

CB2 SLA committee reviews several restaurant license alterations; small stipulations and documentation requested

Neighbors press Community Board 2 to seek SLA enforcement and deny outdoor privileges for Boucherie and Olio after repeated noncompliance

Community board seeks on‑site ADA bathroom before Atlantico Bineo serves alcohol, asks outdoor closing at 10 p.m.