[{"_1":2,"_123":-5,"_124":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,111],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6200481,"mediaKeyId","3813733-abcb3a6ba55e87da49b000adc2fc899d","parentId",3813733,"title","Commission limits Toll House fixes after owner alters historic fabric without approval","audioSeconds",1588,"startMs",4452000,"endMs",6040000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3813733-abcb3a6ba55e87da49b000adc2fc899d&start=4452&end=6040","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3813733-abcb3a6ba55e87da49b000adc2fc899d/thumbnail_4452000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6200481/Baltimore-County/Maryland/Commission-limits-Toll-House-fixes-after-owner-alters-historic-fabric-without-approval","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6200481-219bf5e9edd93ed5033268453b0d61e4/orig.mp4?Expires=1770614618&Signature=M8WT3qhE-Ujh5jEHwycYHq3e7DMRGGDIEgLGfwUczR1ETdiMeZ6i4vzavML4ABumOdbtVMWQBLfSk4S~Je2P21rusetok6lg~q1mkjah~QAnqbaDYkIFqgH5fsZt5iHfVA8htbl6Xr3bbQ8diJu1LvRFzcpjDO7UIf1z~HAv4FYhIbuGNbvsupp-wiDJX9Nthr0V97wmj6OtfM~v7EfnBviKQRb0pHlSJ-D8NKrFbNUNqFnouIvpjhufkPOCtDlP1yXZxwH8zx5qB3DV1okPhHe9CzaGJLZejz9vCH5syeXz63uhr3YxkpbhA0xC7atLDkQ-kwk4Q5dKvpIfbNcVug__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Baltimore County, MD","date","2025-06-13T14:10:08Z","article","The Baltimore County Landmarks Preservation Commission reviewed a correction notice for the Toll House at 13822 York Road (Overbrook Farms LLC), found evidence of multiple unpermitted exterior changes, approved limited emergency repairs and required the property owner to submit full documentation before other work may proceed.

Staff told the commission the circa-1791.5 vernacular Toll House had its original German siding removed from the front facade on May 15; the owner installed new Dutch lap siding and replaced multiple windows without prior LPC approval. Staff’s packet documented the changes and recommended denying several of the window and door replacements due to lack of evidence they were in-kind, approving roof recoating or in-kind replacement, and approving foundation repointing only after submission of mortar composition specifications and adherence to the National Park Service technical brief on repointing.

Commissioner Ed (surname not specified) urged the commission to require the owner to restore the front porch/railing to previous historic appearance or to documented historic evidence. Commissioners also emphasized repeated attempts to tell the owner to stop work and that staff had reported the matter to code enforcement earlier.

After discussion the commission adopted staff-recommended limits with an amendment: it approved the standing-seam roof recoat or in-kind replacement and required mortaring and repointing follow National Park Service guidance, denied the questionable window and door replacements on the stone and concrete-block additions pending documentation, and required the owner to return to the LPC with complete drawings and evidence of historic window dimensions by September. The commission instructed staff to refer the matter to code enforcement if the owner did not comply.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Baltimore County Landmarks Preservation Commission Meeting, June 12, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The commission approved only limited roof and foundation repairs for the Overbrook Farms Toll House after the owner removed original siding and replaced windows and doors without prior approval.","taxTitle","Baltimore County, Maryland","taxId",3882,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6200486,"Landmarks commission denies Glendon dental-office addition and asks for redesign focusing on setbacks and elevator placement",1039,2436000,3475000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3813733-abcb3a6ba55e87da49b000adc2fc899d&start=2436&end=3475","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3813733-abcb3a6ba55e87da49b000adc2fc899d/thumbnail_2436000.jpg","/articles/6200486/Baltimore-County/Maryland/Landmarks-commission-denies-Glendon-dental-office-addition-and-asks-for-redesign-focusing-on-setbacks-and-elevator-placement","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6200486-a131eaca7e2ae0dfdc0a44f02369e7b6/orig.mp4?Expires=1770614618&Signature=MtsEW45i2eFDiWs7ximPdrGiFZC1nE3TM2yr3FwMMFXUIgoDtxsUYGZ-qVZAFsdcCA-wRj0nFM0sb66POcLDVhMzw25lRJDFZHLAF2MEHyGuHsi6GGPJwc07NmrPQ267aNsqhdGhM7kfdjAXCBOTGTGFo-G5-~q1lV0xFc5L6urel3~Qi5AXJMZVZgiLQVPoj5UShkdWx5S0qOoTJKBa2ujYEgOzIYKXTvLbDi4iXql9YxwERTkaupqqeB~cvlyS1R7r8ABuifZNUYwhTcTMnK4J3nYQ16KA14Rx0v6dzgpKAijPCUxLKZoInejq6P~L-e73lwXnFOglYm6X4gBkJw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Baltimore County Landmarks Preservation Commission denied a rear addition plan for 4817 Butler Road, the Glendon Bank/Romay property, and asked the applicant to return with revised drawings at the July meeting.

Caitlin, a preservation staff presenter, outlined the proposal: a one-story L-shaped rear addition with a raised foundation, standing-seam on the shed roof at the side entry and flat (rubber) roofing on the addition, wood-clad 1-over-1 windows, and Hardie-style siding. The addition’s offset from the existing rear wall was small — roughly one foot on one side and as little as 6–8 inches near a handicap elevator — which raised concerns about differentiation of new work from the existing building.

Property owner Dr. Leah Romay said the project’s goal was more clinical space and that she had chosen a designer “because he does work with a lot of historic buildings.” She added the back rooms must accommodate dental chairs and equipment, which constrains plan changes.

Commissioners focused on two recurring concerns: the minimal setback between new and old construction and the placement of the accessibility elevator/lift, which in the proposed plan would open toward the driveway. Commissioner Tom (surname not specified) said opening the elevator into the driveway “is a really, really bad idea”; other commissioners urged shifting the elevator or reconfiguring the vestibule so patients do not exit into vehicle circulation.

After extended discussion where design alternatives were suggested, Commissioner John (surname not specified) moved to deny the application as submitted and asked the applicant to return with revisions incorporating the commission’s suggestions. The motion called for a return at the July meeting; commissioners confirmed that staff would follow up with specific expectations. The roll-call vote to deny carried unanimously.","The commission denied a proposed rear addition for a dental office at 4817 Butler Road, citing concerns about minimal setbacks from the existing building and the placement of an accessibility lift. The applicant was instructed to return with revised plans at the July meeting.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6200490,"Baltimore County panel approves revised rear addition at Corbett Village over neighbors' objections",1751,669000,2420000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3813733-abcb3a6ba55e87da49b000adc2fc899d&start=669&end=2420","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3813733-abcb3a6ba55e87da49b000adc2fc899d/thumbnail_669000.jpg","/articles/6200490/Baltimore-County/Maryland/Baltimore-County-panel-approves-revised-rear-addition-at-Corbett-Village-over-neighbors-objections","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6200490-da28ef1480993fae615385ce4648b391/orig.mp4?Expires=1770614618&Signature=P0tmUyT0IFgO9po1i-iqX-hLtOIMaDQ35tfEIVdxFdzg5ADqdEAO0lMl5W4eZG9JHVa174twwl~sdJuYRDzvpsE9x8wtn7KZOFX75hTPtC8PvJj9djVqTToGjy5a9vpZygpn9E~OeGfwR5WQrguHq6dL9i6NzIzesyetgTTj3NX~V95v5PlYwC9Qsr~XwyNfEzVl-CC4cMVz40GGWVDyHK-hwbgkCnkMrsvr7LjN-InkYIf68doUIQ10SaMz71OUtSr1D2pbu2~M9jgDf1ted-VCzf7OJOuU5YQGBAMPELqpXlBNpSfi52RaOcAINfxr23dCxYufI5mYbvP8NjZsIQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Baltimore County Landmarks Preservation Commission voted 7–4 to approve a revised rear addition at 16223 Corbett Village Lane in the Corbett Village Historic District.

The commission’s chair, Phoebe Evans Latosha, opened the item. Staff told commissioners the revised plan set the new addition back 2 feet from the main house (instead of 1 foot) and lowered the addition’s roof intersection 2 feet below the main roof. Staff said siding will be smooth-finish Hardie board at 5-inch exposure and windows will be fiberglass-exterior, wood-interior, double-hung simulated divided-light units in a 2-over-2 style to match the main house.

Residents objected during public comment. Andrew Clemens, who said his parents bought the house in 1954, told the commission the rear addition “is historic by both Maryland Historical Trust standards and National Register standards” and said elements were removed without LPC approval. Christina Altman urged the commission to retain later alterations, noting that “most properties change over time. Those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved.” Barbara McFarland said she supported the applicants’ changes to set the addition behind the house but worried about materials, saying “appending a shingle roof to the existing metal roof is aesthetically jarring.”

The applicant, identified in the record as Mr. Costa, responded: “Just, not much to add, honestly. Just the last meeting, all the feedback that we received, feel like we went back and lowered the roof, made the footprint smaller by making the indent 2 feet… and really appreciate all the help and feedback that we got to get to this point.”

Commissioners debated whether the rear addition had acquired historic significance and whether alterations had been made before the district’s period of significance (the staff noted the Corbett Village period ends roughly around 1918). Several commissioners said the 1954 photograph and other evidence suggested the rear volume postdated the district’s period of significance and therefore carried less weight in design review.

After discussion, a motion to approve the applicant’s revised design carried on a roll-call vote: John Holman, Ed (surname not specified), Raquel Menezes, Chris Parts, Tom (surname not specified), Chris Weston and Phoebe Evans Latosha voted yes; Wendy MacGyver, Ted McAdam, Lily (surname not specified) and Dan (surname not specified) voted no. The commission’s approval was limited to the revised plans presented at the meeting.

Because the public raised concerns about unpermitted window replacements in earlier work, staff noted that window alterations were not part of this application and would need separate review if raised.","The Baltimore County Landmarks Preservation Commission approved a revised two-story rear addition at 16223 Corbett Village Lane, after residents argued the proposal would remove and destroy a mid-20th-century addition they consider historic. The commission voted 7–4 to approve the revised design with lowered roof and expanded setback.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6200471,"Landmarks commission approves backyard playhouse after ex‑post‑facto review, asks for gable roof",352,3988000,4340000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3813733-abcb3a6ba55e87da49b000adc2fc899d&start=3988&end=4340","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3813733-abcb3a6ba55e87da49b000adc2fc899d/thumbnail_3988000.jpg","/articles/6200471/Baltimore-County/Maryland/Landmarks-commission-approves-backyard-playhouse-after-expostfacto-review-asks-for-gable-roof","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6200471-3441b04abe03964ffb942f53cc5f3f2a/orig.mp4?Expires=1770614618&Signature=FvqnhxXXmRe8TgjybZYZfDxg6I3yNeO1Xeu9OowttF6tQpdsHUJbj-089DiR6XHGOAAasqfudg4uTDcz17vDkNYyvwCTkpdcKRlqqew6ibPFMqtupFuosNlLTMFlYYLJvU1~WWbwR5VD95ZDv2xx1Miki~mNFyN8N26P73JVz75FtF~FO~mvrhkWaC0wzqA4kMJ5iKrji-7rHIitLfovMergj-54-zxaMJAUPu6lDl1gAFg9nPP82IzA7idufFV3sE~-xtLqRN7JZA8aCQi~-yPwWw-FGWOprmPeg3~~yGBNGsqW7Tp~FTjQneV6q~31JkVAdU5bzNW6POxxMWo7vw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Baltimore County Landmarks Preservation Commission reviewed an ex‑post‑facto application for a raised 10-by-10 playhouse constructed without prior approval at 207 West Seminary Avenue in the Lutherville Historic District and approved the structure with a single condition: change the existing flat/low-pitch shed roof to a gabled roof.

Staff told the commission the playhouse sits on a platform roughly 6 feet above grade, has two windows and a small porch, and that the partially constructed playhouse did not match the Etsy-based plans submitted with the application. Staff recommended approval with the condition that the roof be gabled to make the structure visually read as a playhouse rather than a shed and reminded the commission that anything over 15 feet would require a height variance.

The property owner said they would comply with a gabled-roof condition and suggested planting evergreen screening if needed for privacy. A motion to approve with staff’s recommended condition carried on roll call.","The commission approved an ex‑post‑facto review for a raised 10-by-10 playhouse at 207 West Seminary Avenue with the condition that the roof be changed to a gable form to better fit the historic setting.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6200476,"Commission approves replacement garage for Pikesville property with conditions on roof, siding and windows",655,6060000,6715000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3813733-abcb3a6ba55e87da49b000adc2fc899d&start=6060&end=6715","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3813733-abcb3a6ba55e87da49b000adc2fc899d/thumbnail_6060000.jpg","/articles/6200476/Baltimore-County/Maryland/Commission-approves-replacement-garage-for-Pikesville-property-with-conditions-on-roof-siding-and-windows","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6200476-aa2c5cf86fd37aaa9a4321037833e4f2/orig.mp4?Expires=1770614618&Signature=ZdzRieAJ935oEHIXn4Q6f0Du-RU30iHcGJswQY7hpxv2NJJCfxdcb9ENpK2R8bdXATxkQ418YGoHtoPDl3HVudtr9HACC8LY51jK87O8uJXyHASJFcyzzozI1xZ44Qzx1o46dqsbWFPmJAh0qoZaUXFOtVvm~MIefXXVMXggfteSdcxo8PHhfQnJubqvYJBQQM8gOV9ygjZRKNpDCXeYut2fL94Ac6W9kEy4loYySTs51ceKN1cWVNI58jZf87mWsk014jma9RLSf8h8ZxQ95YJENMdK2f3iG6hftF4xpp31d-ytOFVgB1m6f8wVk9QH~rSzbpuyIv9ovtzIvyBV5Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Baltimore County Landmarks Preservation Commission approved a replacement detached garage at 508 Subbrook Lane in the Subbrook Park Historic District, subject to material and form conditions intended to retain the historic character of the property.

Staff described the proposed 22-by-24-foot, one-and-a-half-story two-car garage to be located roughly in the footprint of the previous garage that was removed after storm damage. The applicant proposed PVC-engineered shingles for siding and a gable roof with a centered gable dormer; staff recommended a cementitious shingle (Hardie or similar) and 6-over-1 windows to better match the historic setting.

Owners Mister and Missus Gladden told the commission they sought a design that “fit in with the house and the historic look of the neighborhood” and that they had walked the neighborhood for reference. The project’s designer confirmed the team could accept the Hardie shingle and 6-over-1 window direction and said roof height and zoning verification would be addressed during permitting.

Commissioners approved the project on the condition that the siding be cementitious (Hardie or similar) rather than PVC, the roof form be a hip roof (instead of the proposed gable with dormer), overhead doors be carriage-style in appearance and windows be a 6-over-1 style matching the historic character. The commission allowed staff to review final drawings for compliance with those conditions.","The commission approved a replacement detached garage at 508 Subbrook Lane (Pikesville) with conditions: use of a cementitious (Hardie) shingle product instead of PVC, a hip roof rather than the submitted gable/dormer, carriage-style overhead doors, and windows in a 6-over-1 pattern to match historic character. Staff may review final drawings.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Commission limits Toll House fixes after owner alters historic fabric without approval

Landmarks commission denies Glendon dental-office addition and asks for redesign focusing on setbacks and elevator placement

Baltimore County panel approves revised rear addition at Corbett Village over neighbors' objections

Landmarks commission approves backyard playhouse after ex‑post‑facto review, asks for gable roof

Commission approves replacement garage for Pikesville property with conditions on roof, siding and windows