Uresti and Pacheco detail El Paso's legislative session outcomes at county briefing

In the heart of El Paso, the County Commissioners Court convened on June 16, 2025, to discuss the outcomes of the recent legislative session and its implications for the community. The atmosphere was charged with anticipation as Jacqueline Uresti and Michael Pacheco from Phillips Uresti Meacham Partners presented a detailed legislative update, highlighting key bills and budgetary changes that could significantly impact El Paso County.

Uresti began by acknowledging the hard work of the county administration and legislative delegation, emphasizing their effective advocacy in Austin. The session had been particularly challenging, marked by a record number of bills filed, which led to a legislative logjam. Despite these hurdles, several important bills were passed, including significant funding for public education and property tax relief measures.

One of the most notable developments was the passage of SB 2, which allocates $1 billion for school vouchers, allowing families to apply for funds to send their children to private schools. In contrast, HB 2 secured an additional $8.5 billion for public education, primarily aimed at increasing teacher salaries. This dual approach to education funding reflects a broader debate on how best to support students and educators in Texas.

The meeting also addressed pressing local issues, such as water infrastructure. SB 7, which provides increased funding for water projects, aims to bolster the county's ability to manage its water resources effectively. This is particularly crucial given the ongoing challenges related to water scarcity in the region.

Another significant topic was the discussion around border security funding. The court expressed concerns over a federal reconciliation process that could affect reimbursements for Operation Lone Star expenditures. Commissioners voiced the need for direct funding to counties rather than through the state, highlighting the urgency of addressing financial shortfalls related to border enforcement.

As the meeting progressed, the court reviewed various legislative priorities, including bail reform and local governance issues. While some bills aimed at reforming bail practices passed, others that sought to limit local authority did not gain traction. The court's proactive stance on these matters underscores its commitment to maintaining local control amid state-level challenges.

Looking ahead, the court is preparing for potential special sessions, with discussions already underway regarding congressional redistricting and taxpayer-funded lobbying. The upcoming veto period, ending June 22, also looms large, as the court awaits the governor's decisions on recently passed legislation.

In closing, the commissioners reiterated their commitment to navigating the complexities of state mandates and funding challenges. With a significant portion of the county's budget tied to unfunded mandates, the court is exploring strategies to mitigate the financial burden on taxpayers while continuing to advocate for the needs of the El Paso community. As they move forward, the court remains vigilant, ready to address the evolving landscape of local governance and legislative priorities.