[{"_1":2,"_88":-5,"_89":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6538513,"mediaKeyId","3842812-0dcf9a8b8dd490e612ff9a9eb91eec6e","parentId",3842812,"title","Votes at a glance: key actions taken at the June 12 Oklahoma City Planning Commission meeting","audioSeconds",10284,"startMs",184000,"endMs",10468000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3842812-0dcf9a8b8dd490e612ff9a9eb91eec6e&start=184&end=10468","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3842812-0dcf9a8b8dd490e612ff9a9eb91eec6e/thumbnail_184000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6538513/Oklahoma/Votes-at-a-glance-key-actions-taken-at-the-June-12-Oklahoma-City-Planning-Commission-meeting","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6538513-144679e701fdfa87ab8d3ca871e8cbd0/orig.mp4?Expires=1771204441&Signature=Jy1P9Vel8ibgjpHbJyCXkvChjij-vE1jdX4nw8PIYTYdJHDN78RNIee5yDCZsu-o8s0gp4Y6dHY-5d7X6RFTKhdmaVGLi3IAsR0IrIbsAT-EGvzhlMu5jv0fxj8gh7NjuJwBB~iJALYPnqyR7uRF-FYPYio275K-MLagaa1JDN8oc8A~FNiGpxKm2fh6NOGioY8tc2C~hgUCA666Yg-yItmGMiA7h9B0M2cCHuITYwhxYE569SA-CUWHNFzVfc9p6fg9gkGefjXoxVaraPEdl0AhRT-iUcO7HqPpLoOiGOwNMcxbiGlzckxWJBJsUssLdBGq7fAu1vcO-IMugjhVRg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","City of Oklahoma","date","2025-06-13T09:48:46Z","article","The Oklahoma City Planning Commission conducted a large-volume agenda June 12 and recorded motions and votes across a range of land-use matters, rezoning requests, plats and special permits. Below are the motions the commission approved or recommended at the meeting, as recorded in the meeting transcript. Items that the body recommended for City Council action are noted as such.

Votes at a glance

- Receive minutes for May 22, 2025: motion to receive the minutes — approved.
- Continuance requests (uncontested items 33'38 and new requests 22 and 29): motions to approve continuances and deferrals to July 24 — approved.
- Consent docket (items 1 and 3): motion to approve consent docket as modified — approved.
- C7741, Esperanza Gardens (final plat): motion to approve final plat — approved by roll call.
- V30 (variance for Lexford Park Phase 1 streets naming): motion to approve variance V30 — approved.
- DA15PH (lot split at 12025 SW 104th): variance to subdivision regs and deed approval — variance approved; application recommended for approval.
- PUD 19-15 SPO3 (specific plan at NW 13th St): motion to approve the specific plan — approved.
- CE1142 (closure of platted public alleys in Prosper Heart Park): motion to recommend approval to City Council — recommended for approval.
- CPA202504 (comprehensive plan amendment moving urban future layer): motion to approve CPA 20-25-04 — approved.
- PUD 20-68 (rezoning 15095 N Sarah Road): motion to recommend approval with technical evaluations — recommended for approval.
- C7740 (preliminary plat of Chaminix): motion to approve preliminary plat with TE requiring perimeter maintenance by HOA — approved.
- CPA 20-25-3 (remove employment land-use layer, plus added 11 acres): motion to approve with the additional 11 acres included — approved by the commission and forwarded.
- PUD 20-69 (rezoning 9109 W Heffner Rd): motion to recommend approval; TE adjusted to increase brick facade requirement for Tract 1 to 70% — recommended for approval.
- PC10971 (rezone 1238 NW 2nd Street to R-3): motion to recommend approval — recommended for approval.
- PC10974 (rezone 7025 Kleiner Ave to R-2): applicant withdrew the application during the meeting; withdrawal accepted.
- PC10975 (rezone 15100 N County Line Rd to R-1): motion to recommend approval — recommended for approval.
- SP 5-99 (special permit for CityCare medical respite at 520 N Villa): motion to recommend approval of the special permit for a medical-respite facility — recommended for approval.
- PUD 20-74 (rezoning 11300 SE 89th St): motion to recommend approval — recommended for approval.
- PUD 20-70 (rezoning 2001 E Memorial Rd): motion to recommend approval — recommended for approval.
- PUD 20-71 (rezoning 3555 NW 58th St to PUD 2071): motion to recommend approval with technical evaluations — recommended for approval.
- PUD 20-75 (rezoning 6800 Miramar Blvd to PUD 20-75): motion to recommend approval — recommended for approval.
- SPD 17-30 (rezone 2509 N Walker Ave to SPD 17-30): motion to recommend approval with a TE limiting convenience sales and personal services to first-floor, Walker/20th frontage — recommended for approval.
- SPUD 17-39 (rezone 1701 S Mustang Rd): motion to recommend approval — recommended for approval.
- SPUD 17-40 (rezone 2801 S Mustang Rd): motion to recommend approval with added TEs for landscaping, dumpster enclosure finish and call-box restrictions — recommended for approval.
- SPUD 17-35 (rezone 830 NW 56th St): motion to recommend approval — recommended for approval.
- SPUD 17-34 (rezone 1300 NW 22nd St in Gatewood UC): motion to recommend approval with amendment to reference Gatewood roof regulations — recommended for approval.
- SPUD 17-38 (rezone 1801 NW 14th St): motion to recommend approval including pervious paving requirement for parking fronting NW 14th — recommended for approval.
- SPUD 16-85 (rezone 3104 NE 82nd St): motion to recommend approval with agreed technical evaluations 2, 3 and 7 and deletion of other TEs per applicant/neighborhood agreement — recommended for approval.

Items deferred or withdrawn

- Item 28 (SPUD1733) was deferred to July 24 at the applicant's request.
- PC10974 (7025 Kleiner Ave) was withdrawn by the applicant during the meeting and the withdrawal was accepted.

How the commission handled votes

Most items on the agenda were resolved by motion and voice vote; several rezones and special permits were recorded as recommendations to City Council, which will take final action. A small number of items required roll-call votes; most consent items, continuances and technical approvals were handled by voice vote with recorded \"aye\" indications in the transcript.

What happens next

Where the commission recommended approval of a rezoning or special permit, the recommendation will be forwarded to City Council for public hearings and a final vote. Preliminary plats approved by the commission still require final plat submittal and review. Items deferred will return to the commission on the July 24 docket or at dates set by the applicant.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Oklahoma City Planning Commission - June 12, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Planning Commission voted on a long agenda including plats, rezones, variances and special permits. This roundup lists motions the commission approved or recommended and notes items deferred or withdrawn.","taxTitle","Other Public Meetings, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma","taxId",69689,"location","Oklahoma","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6538519,"Oklahoma City Planning Commission approves proposed 2025 general obligation bond program",852,1060000,1912000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3842812-0dcf9a8b8dd490e612ff9a9eb91eec6e&start=1060&end=1912","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3842812-0dcf9a8b8dd490e612ff9a9eb91eec6e/thumbnail_1060000.jpg","/articles/6538519/Oklahoma/Oklahoma-City-Planning-Commission-approves-proposed-2025-general-obligation-bond-program","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6538519-ea345f818a6f264f5f468e70b474bc30/orig.mp4?Expires=1771204441&Signature=TjjMRFcV4ZyzVM1dz-BamcDptPiyaZttly7nlfFAksRX2NkC7uSgTnAr5SGMc-9Sy6WN131CrBMWxY399lMz3YC1ePK939pm4iVuZrlxtFgPHQSZ-4VHsSdyaNRWAR1kdrr~btDk9Z3X6zthRRozdkFTpQYNkvWdzsISFA9m1uiX3qtJYMufgnwBwK6nezynyiwsnGRbFVrCWgL3X8IzGnoCSRO8~ODSJaNiSy6AZBi9UmH6I~yPzuzlaoVzbJ-LtI8do2H58zSivnsfJ~DlVKhXPn3MRrE4XqcJVehE0G0Ak7~nQihdGZ~FjhPsdQ86xlmHx2pvrbEY46nUhfzCkg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Oklahoma City Planning Commission on June 12 voted unanimously to approve a resolution endorsing the city's proposed 2025 general obligation bond program, a roughly $2.7 billion package of capital projects that city staff presented as the primary funding vehicle for streets, bridges, parks and other infrastructure.

Planning staff said the bond package allocates about $1.35 billion to streets and sidewalks, $91 million to bridges and roughly $145 million to economic and community development (including $50 million for affordable housing). Staff also described a public engagement process that informed project prioritization and a timeline that calls for City Council introduction on June 17, council action in mid-July and a voter referendum in October.

The vote followed a detailed staff presentation that outlined project selection criteria drawn from Plan OKC, VisionOKC, BikeWalk OKC and the Parks and Recreation master plan, and that emphasized traffic counts, pavement condition index and equity considerations in prioritizing resurfacing, widening and pedestrian projects. Staff identified 547 listed projects in the bond packet and said approximately half the total program is dedicated to transportation infrastructure.

Commissioner Don Noble made the motion to approve the resolution; Commissioner Govine seconded. A roll-call and voice vote produced unanimous support from the commissioners present.

The commission's action is advisory: the bond package still requires City Council introduction and approval and will be placed before voters in October if the council adopts a final ordinance. Staff said the council schedule anticipates an introduction on June 17, council approval in mid-July and the ballot question in October.

Why it matters: The bond would be the city's principal source of capital funding for a wide range of public improvements, including transportation, drainage, parks, libraries, public safety facilities and transit; if approved by voters it will guide project delivery, capital planning and local contracting over the coming years.

Planning staff said more detailed project maps and lists are available on the city's bond website and encouraged residents to review the packet or contact the Public Works Bond Office for questions.","The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve a resolution endorsing the proposed $2.7 billion 2025 general obligation bond program and forwarded the item to City Council for final action later this summer and an October ballot.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: key actions taken at the June 12 Oklahoma City Planning Commission meeting

Oklahoma City Planning Commission approves proposed 2025 general obligation bond program