Little Tokyo stakeholders debate transition to property based business improvement district

Concerns over the future of Little Tokyo's Business Improvement District (BID) dominated discussions at the Los Angeles City Council meeting on June 17, 2025. Community leaders and business owners voiced urgent calls for a transition from a merchant-based to a property-based BID, citing escalating safety and cleanliness issues exacerbated by recent events.

The president of the Little Tokyo Business Association highlighted the BID's struggle for sustainability, particularly after the pandemic's toll on small businesses. "We need a well-funded BID program to support public safety, cleanliness, and a well-designed marketing strategy," he stated, emphasizing the community's vulnerability amid rising crime and vandalism.

Brian Kito, president of Little Tokyo Public Safety, shared a harrowing personal account of violence in the area, underscoring the urgent need for enhanced security measures. "Security is our number one concern in Little Tokyo," he declared, reflecting a sentiment echoed by many speakers who expressed frustration over inadequate safety resources.

However, the proposed transition to a property-based BID has sparked significant opposition. Critics argue that the timing is inappropriate, given current economic pressures, and raise concerns about transparency and community engagement in the decision-making process. "There has been a tremendous lack of transparency and community outreach," one resident lamented, questioning the necessity of additional assessments on already burdened homeowners.

Supporters of the transition argue it is essential for maintaining a vibrant and safe community, with some calling for a more inclusive planning process that reflects the diverse voices of Little Tokyo's stakeholders. "We can see efficient and effective services that result in a Little Tokyo that's worth this additional investment," one property owner asserted.

As the council deliberates on the future of the BID, the community remains divided, with many advocating for a solution that balances safety, economic viability, and the preservation of Little Tokyo's unique cultural identity. The outcome of this discussion could significantly impact the neighborhood's resilience and appeal to both residents and visitors alike.