Newcastle County discusses impact fees and brownfield redevelopment challenges

In the heart of New Castle County, a pivotal meeting unfolded on June 17, 2025, as the Land Use Committee gathered to address the complexities of redevelopment, particularly concerning brownfield sites. The atmosphere was charged with a sense of urgency as committee members discussed the implications of existing policies on local infrastructure and community services.

At the forefront of the discussion was the impact of redevelopment on local fire and emergency services, particularly in areas like the historic steel mill site, which has long been dormant. Councilman Cartier raised concerns about the lack of impact fees associated with these sites, emphasizing that the Claymont Fire Company, which would be responsible for responding to emergencies in newly developed areas, had not been adequately considered in the current framework. "The capital considerations for the Claymont Fire Company to respond to any kind of emergencies... should not just be exempted," he stated, highlighting the real-world implications of policy decisions.

The committee explored the existing exemptions for brownfield redevelopment, which have been in place since the early 2000s. These exemptions were designed to incentivize the revitalization of neglected sites, but as the conversation progressed, it became clear that the landscape of redevelopment has evolved. The committee acknowledged that while the original intent was to encourage development, the absence of impact fees could place an undue burden on local services.

Anthony Sekowsky from the New Castle County Land Use Department noted that recent changes to the code aimed to capture additional square footage beyond what existed on the site, thereby introducing some level of fee structure for new developments. However, the committee recognized the need for further refinement. "We could absolutely take a look at that," Sekowsky affirmed, indicating a willingness to collaborate on potential amendments that could address the concerns raised.

As the discussion continued, the committee members considered alternative funding mechanisms, such as tax increment financing, which could provide a more sustainable approach to funding infrastructure improvements in redeveloped areas. Councilman Cartier suggested that exploring these options could alleviate some of the financial pressures on local services while still promoting redevelopment.

The meeting concluded with a commitment to further dialogue, as members expressed a desire to work collaboratively to refine the existing policies. The conversation underscored the delicate balance between encouraging redevelopment and ensuring that local services are adequately supported. As New Castle County moves forward, the outcomes of these discussions will play a crucial role in shaping the future of its communities, ensuring that growth is both sustainable and equitable.