Mitchell residents oppose prison proposal citing safety and community impact concerns

Mitchell City Council faced a heated debate during its June 16, 2025 meeting, as community members voiced strong opposition to a proposed maximum-security prison. The proposal has sparked significant concern among residents, who fear it could alter the town's identity and negatively impact safety and quality of life.

Many speakers expressed their belief that a prison would not enhance Mitchell's reputation as "Palace City," a community known for its family-friendly atmosphere and tourism centered around the Corn Palace. Residents like Michaela Johnson articulated fears that the prison would transform the town into "Prison City," leading to increased crime and a decline in property values. Johnson emphasized that prisons do not deliver on promises of economic growth, often resulting in job opportunities that do not benefit local residents.

Community members highlighted the lack of transparency surrounding the prison proposal, criticizing the Mitchell Area Development Corporation (MADC) for not adequately involving the public in discussions. Several speakers, including business owners and parents, raised concerns about safety, particularly regarding the proximity of the prison to schools and residential areas. They argued that the potential risks associated with a maximum-security facility could deter families from living in Mitchell, ultimately harming local businesses and the community's economy.

The council was urged to reconsider its support for the prison, with residents calling for a focus on sustainable growth that prioritizes the well-being of current residents over short-term economic gains. Many emphasized the need for community-driven development that reflects the values and desires of Mitchell's long-term residents.

As the meeting concluded, the overwhelming sentiment among speakers was clear: the community stands united against the prison proposal, advocating for a future that preserves Mitchell's identity and quality of life. The council's next steps will be crucial in determining the direction of this contentious issue, as residents await a response to their concerns.