Findlay City Council addresses cease and desist on Downtown North River project

In the dimly lit chambers of Findlay City Hall, council members gathered on June 17, 2025, to address pressing issues that could shape the future of the community. The atmosphere was charged with anticipation as discussions unfolded around significant developments, particularly concerning flood risk mitigation and ongoing annexation projects.

One of the key topics was a letter from senior project manager Mike Coop and Timothy Murphy, vice president of civil engineering consultants, which highlighted the city’s efforts in flood risk mitigation and environmental remediation. This letter was added to the council's written communications, emphasizing the city's commitment to addressing these critical environmental concerns.

The council also reviewed two replacement ordinances, including one related to the annexation of Hobart Avenue, which involved adjustments to the acreage. Another ordinance addressed changes to FEMA properties, specifically updating the addresses of three affected properties. These amendments were unanimously approved, reflecting the council's proactive approach to urban planning and disaster preparedness.

As the meeting progressed, the council turned its attention to petitions regarding annexations from Keller Seifert Enterprises LLC and the Northtown Condominium Villas. Both petitions had completed the required 60-day hold and were set to advance to the City Planning Commission and Planning and Zoning Committee for further consideration in their upcoming July meeting.

However, the evening took a more contentious turn with the introduction of a cease and desist letter from the group Findlay Citizens for a Safe City. This letter demanded an immediate halt to all activities related to the Downtown North River development project and the Anchor Park redevelopment, citing the initiation of an ordinance petition that would allow residents to vote on the matter. The group argued that proceeding with the projects would undermine their constitutional rights.

In response, the city’s Director of Law, Rob Feitner, clarified that the filing of an initiative petition does not automatically stop ongoing projects. He explained that while the petition process allows citizens to propose laws for voter approval, it does not serve as an injunction against current activities. This legal perspective aimed to reassure council members and the public that the city could continue its planning efforts despite the petition.

The meeting concluded without any utility or contractor communications, leaving the council to reflect on the implications of the evening's discussions. As Findlay navigates these complex issues, the balance between development and community concerns remains a pivotal challenge, one that will undoubtedly shape the city’s landscape in the months to come.