[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6514663,"mediaKeyId","5028226-041a234f166088912b49a6fa1a534651","parentId",5028226,"title","Taneytown approves RedSpeed contract for school-zone speed cameras on Trevanyan Road; two absent council members opposed","audioSeconds",2288,"startMs",1727000,"endMs",4015000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5028226-041a234f166088912b49a6fa1a534651&start=1727&end=4015","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5028226-041a234f166088912b49a6fa1a534651/thumbnail_1727000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6514663/Taneytown/Carroll-County/Maryland/Taneytown-approves-RedSpeed-contract-for-school-zone-speed-cameras-on-Trevanyan-Road-two-absent-council-members-opposed","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6514663-9d621e7d56fb930d4b9f809e5be82302/orig.mp4?Expires=1776210347&Signature=aJzwioNX4shltVvEXUZCYqU5ruqEHkzTab4~fBHJF06IofoA3BWBZ34wRq0OwtQ4owcJGnuYD3f8mNCbWWY2ksIk754sbxdWE3FNj921IBoOsVp3jZ667GbRhr771z~KV2Zy~Jcg0xpfKbZPwT1otCMAilIeXmtc05FgZZcSc1Nv6StioMxjAe9KFoOOXAJF0I05BDvVUqAhDe389~Wy3aM7jgeZiMXRFKBZPjck-hLZnVDn9Kqoo-4sGVEpFd5jGJK~8GZRANDrqvZ7-uLSZhdBCHhyWnXO90xxBrAvRaYh1zDeIPktoyoobqFTyG5rBE2XsMWPwnnj6ZeBun4yJA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Taneytown, MD","date","2025-06-19T12:44:16Z","article","The Taneytown Mayor and City Council on June 18 approved a piggyback contract with RedSpeed to provide static speed-camera monitoring in areas allowed by state law, with the primary initial site identified as Trevanyan Road.

Why it matters: The contract delegates installation, maintenance and citation processing to the vendor and is intended to reduce speeding in a school-zone corridor while freeing police officers for other duties. State law limits municipal speed-camera use to school-zone areas; the council said Trevanyan Road is the primary qualifying location under the city’s enabling legislation.

The contract is a multi-year agreement the city is piggybacking off an existing procurement. The mayor noted that “there’s going to be stuff in the contract that does not apply to us” and reminded the council that the town’s enabling legislation covers only speed cameras, not red-light or stop-sign cameras.

Key terms and implementation details described in the meeting record include:
- Installation, maintenance and citation processing are handled by RedSpeed; the vendor bears installation costs and charging for processing is part of the vendor model.
- The vendor’s processing/administrative fee was discussed as approximately $14 per violation; an additional customer-service fee of $0.99 applies when a violator calls customer service, and a $2.99 flagging fee applies if unpaid citations are referred for registration-flagging.
- The contract initial term is five years, with up to five single-year extensions; price increases on extension years must be considered upon request.
- The council expects an initial warning period and trial phase; officials discussed a 30-day warning window in which warnings are issued before citations are enforced. “They will send warnings,” the mayor said.
- The police lieutenant said final citation review by authorized officers should be quick: “reviewing one of them should take less than 5 minutes,” Lieutenant Bakker said.
- The vendor’s RedCheck software will be installed for authorized police access, and the system can generate performance reports; officials discussed providing quarterly performance updates to council via liaison reports.

Revenue and uses: Council members noted revenue projections vary; prior studies projected an initial drop-off in violations after cameras are activated. Officials said any revenue from speed-camera citations must be used for public-safety purposes under applicable legislation; the mayor said, “any of those revenues will basically they have to go to public safety per, legislation.”

Legal and operational limits: The mayor reiterated that state rules confine municipal speed-camera placement to school zones and that other camera types or placements would require additional enabling action by the state or different authorities (for example, State Highway Administration for state-owned corridors).

Questions and concerns raised during discussion included whether mobile-camera language should be removed from the piggybacked contract (staff said removing items would negate the ability to piggyback), whether the contract signature should be by the mayor or the city manager (staff advised the city manager has authority under the charter for contracts below certain dollar thresholds), and who will be responsible for collection of delinquent payments (the municipality bears that responsibility if it pursues collections).

The council moved and seconded the contract; the motion carried. The mayor noted opposition from two council members who were not present: Councilmember McCarron and Councilmember Mead. The transcript records the mayor stating those members “are opposed to it.”

","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Mayor & City Council Special Meeting / Budget Hearing June 18, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Council approved a piggyback contract with RedSpeed to install static speed cameras focused on a school-zone section of Trevanyan Road, with vendor installation, maintenance and violation processing; the contract passed despite stated opposition from two absent council members.","taxTitle","Taneytown, Carroll County, Maryland","taxId",71667,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6514667,"Taneytown council adopts FY2025–26 operating budget after public hearing on newsletter, Main Street and traffic priorities",3984,89000,4073000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5028226-041a234f166088912b49a6fa1a534651&start=89&end=4073","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5028226-041a234f166088912b49a6fa1a534651/thumbnail_89000.jpg","/articles/6514667/Taneytown/Carroll-County/Maryland/Taneytown-council-adopts-FY202526-operating-budget-after-public-hearing-on-newsletter-Main-Street-and-traffic-priorities","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6514667-160a9c32da2935af7c19ed04282fa233/orig.mp4?Expires=1776210347&Signature=npNReLfg3oHYzTw2rF-P9Il~3LmnDsD1bGKRsc~x1tpeogJCvUuF8VxGvRB9Q3Y63O8LUELs0stYLQ0h1TF7oyUsIDO4GLMZJ2dXKjA6cl8NRP1TWbHsX~z3z8MAcYYrFw4OMMjXgtHBUa2SCPUFtVlODWvtWMJ061ocDIZ~B61ctMm-shLwDD-lBQYZC8DkO6hLycr6c3cnvJB-UGgmSJE5BIXZoHQW16QUJ776Q4eN49rNErrCpeTj8vf88Aj1KnYAxgf3JHgwUWw9anE4RhktyKC~4xv033CHONYGUdu5TLCVKanoHFz54-XJIB84vkMKUwB3KuuX7sTuR70b5g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Taneytown Mayor and City Council on June 18 adopted Ordinance 06-2025, the fiscal year 2025–26 operating budget, following a public hearing held throughout the special meeting.

The budget adoption directs city spending for the coming year and provides the administration with authority to use general-fund resources subject to council oversight. The public hearing remained open during the meeting, and council took voice votes to approve the ordinance.

Why it matters: The ordinance sets municipal priorities and appropriation authority for city services; residents used the hearing to press officials on local economic development, communications and public-safety needs that could affect how budget amendments are proposed and spent.

During public comment, Paul Kluth, identified in the record as a Taneytown resident and business owner, urged the council to prioritize economic development and asked for clarification on line items tied to a proposed city newsletter. “The annual budget should always address the priorities of the residents and the landowners,” Kluth said. He said the initial cost for the mailing would be covered from the current fiscal year funds and that subsequent mailings would follow an opt-in, with the newsletter also posted online. “The initial cost, the first mailing of it, is gonna come out of this current fiscal year budget. So fiscal year 2025,” Kluth said.

Kluth and others described the newsletter as a one-page administrative publication with a calendar, meeting dates, a mayor’s message and department notes; the city will do an initial mass mailing to establish an opt-in list and then use budget amendments, if needed, to fund ongoing mailings.

Resident Alex Kelly asked the council to consider capital investments that would make Main Street more attractive to shoppers, including long-term steps aimed at reducing commercial traffic through downtown. “Making that road a lot more calming would be the first step,” Kelly said, noting comparisons to nearby towns where bypass routes reduce through traffic.

Council members and the mayor responded that some revenue sources are restricted by fund type — notably that enterprise funds such as water cannot be transferred to capital projects like a bypass — and that unspent funds from the current fiscal year roll to the general fund. The mayor said the city would review audit results before authorizing carryover spending and indicated some unspent FY25 funds might be used for police equipment if the audit supports it.

Council discussed the budget amendment process repeatedly: rather than placing uncertain amounts in line items up front, the administration said it would bring specific amendment requests to council for public review and a vote before spending on new projects, such as marketing or Main Street initiatives.

After public comment and council discussion, the council took a voice vote. The meeting transcript records the mayor calling for those in favor to say “Aye,” and then saying, “Budget is approved.”

The council closed the public hearing on the FY2025–26 operating budget and moved to adjourn the special meeting.

","Taneytown’s Mayor and City Council adopted Ordinance 06-2025, the fiscal year 2025–26 operating budget, after a public hearing that included resident comments about a proposed city newsletter, Main Street economic development, road calming and police vehicle needs.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Taneytown approves RedSpeed contract for school-zone speed cameras on Trevanyan Road; two absent council members opposed

Taneytown council adopts FY2025–26 operating budget after public hearing on newsletter, Main Street and traffic priorities