A pivotal discussion on teacher pay reform took center stage during the Arizona House Appropriations Committee meeting on June 17, 2025. The proposed "strike everything" amendment aims to establish a dedicated teacher pay fund, ensuring that eligible teachers' base salaries cannot dip below the fiscal year 2026 levels. This fund, administered by the Arizona Department of Education (ADE), outlines how salary increases will be determined and mandates compliance reporting for schools receiving these funds.

Marisol Garcia, president of the Arizona Education Association and an eighth-grade social studies teacher, voiced concerns about the amendment's potential impact on teacher retention and recruitment. She highlighted that while the proposal includes performance-based bonuses, it does not integrate these increases into teachers' base salaries. "This will not necessarily move the needle as needed than if it went directly to salaries," Garcia stated, emphasizing that many teachers, especially those in their early careers, need stable income to make significant life decisions.

The discussion also touched on the challenges faced by special education teachers and support staff. Garcia warned that the proposed structure could exacerbate existing issues, potentially leading to pay cuts for these critical roles. "We are losing critical positions," she noted, pointing out that many support staff, such as nurses and paraprofessionals, are already underpaid compared to other job opportunities.

Amanda Lugo, a parent of a disabled student, echoed these concerns, urging lawmakers to oppose the amendment. She argued that prioritizing general education teacher pay could neglect the essential roles of special education staff, which are crucial for the success of students with disabilities.

As the committee deliberates, the implications of this amendment could significantly affect Arizona's educational landscape, particularly in retaining quality educators and ensuring equitable support for all students. The next steps will involve further discussions and potential adjustments before the proposal is presented to voters in the upcoming general election.