Milo Grogan Zoning Board considers variances for new housing development amid community concerns

The Board of Zoning Adjustment in Columbus held a special meeting on June 24, 2025, to discuss a proposal for variances related to a new housing development in the Milo Grogan neighborhood. The meeting highlighted significant community concerns regarding the impact of the proposed development on the local area.

The applicant, represented by David Hodges, argued that the variances were necessary for urban redevelopment, emphasizing that the project would not negatively affect governmental services. Hodges acknowledged that the property owner likely purchased the land with knowledge of existing zoning restrictions but maintained that the variances were essential for responsible development in an urban context. He pointed to the city's ongoing evaluation of its zoning code, which he described as historically suburban and ill-suited for urban infill projects.

Community members voiced strong opposition to the proposal. Patricia Segura, a long-time resident, expressed concerns about the potential loss of privacy and the aesthetic impact of new homes facing her property. She highlighted her family's long history in the neighborhood and questioned the developer's intentions. Alina Hinkle, chair of the Milo Grogan Civic Association, also opposed the project, citing concerns about the proposed attached garages and the overall fit of the development within the existing neighborhood character.

Joe Motil, a former zoning chair, criticized the project for its density and potential negative effects on the community's character and green space. He urged the board to table the application for further discussion with the neighborhood, emphasizing the need for community engagement in the planning process.

The board members acknowledged the community's concerns but noted that their decision would be based on the legal standards for variances rather than the broader implications of housing policy. The meeting concluded with a call for further deliberation on the proposal, reflecting the ongoing tension between development needs and community preservation in Columbus.