[{"_1":2,"_100":-5,"_101":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6657565,"mediaKeyId","5067057-22cbec004679d68203a2a1cc8f18ada0","parentId",5067057,"title","TWC issues mixed rulings on Docket 26 wage claims and unemployment insurance cases; several rehearings and modifications ordered","audioSeconds",1167,"startMs",390000,"endMs",1557000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5067057-22cbec004679d68203a2a1cc8f18ada0&start=390&end=1557","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5067057-22cbec004679d68203a2a1cc8f18ada0/thumbnail_390000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6657565/Texas/TWC-issues-mixed-rulings-on-Docket-26-wage-claims-and-unemployment-insurance-cases-several-rehearings-and-modifications-ordered","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6657565-e74170a8e8d2f412db26646a41853295/orig.mp4?Expires=1773659473&Signature=dHjVK5kmcoBvUrzINKqD5FlXKznbMTwly-FHMQfNRTtOxpISHDKeBa-sIoiJE1yFkzi1dk31cQW9SpyFbYfPEI-77383afQEDbV6oLsKjyGdh5nY1kSbFXIHFah0L2GeO0o9Z7ZAgFf-4-W4NuAaA6UW~xazMpdLuGh-Qrnhc0vHYULTPixspuiuh0SzewlAJDIgLIVfmGZDZwTGvIxH6AMwZgsR-OLqwVusch4zyrFhxo16~1zdDhVV8rGsiLwb6nENVH0odWkmEjgOMPrpau2SaoyyXTTKr1x5ctC-xMYOCbEftbtxcpPRgyMfuCtBP3Fp~bu0vy2G5ixgYi5voA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Workforce Commission (TWC)","date","2025-06-24T16:55:02.82Z","article","The Texas Workforce Commission on Docket 26 considered wage claim recommendations and a series of unemployment insurance (UI) contested cases, producing a mix of affirmations, modifications and rehearing orders.

For wage claims, a commissioner moved to accept staff recommendations on the remaining wage claim cases on Docket 26; another commissioner seconded with exceptions noted in the short-form dissent list. The motion passed with those exceptions.

Commissioners then addressed UI cases individually. Highlights from the transcript include:

- Case 3601885: Commissioner Trevino moved to modify the administrative law decision after finding the claimant had good cause for missing a hearing notice and that the employer had not met its burden to show misconduct. The transcript records a modification and a recommendation to rehear as an alternative if further evidence was required.

- Case 3667057: Commissioners voted to rehear the case to develop evidence related to the employer’s absence at a rehearing and whether the employer had good cause for missing the originally scheduled hearing.

- Case 3676210: The commission modified the AT decision, finding the claimant’s conduct did not amount to misconduct connected with work and ordering chargeback treatment as reflected in the transcript.

- Cases 3688734 and 3688737: Commissioners recorded findings supporting affirming the AT decisions that the claimants committed claim fraud for the period cited, with an overpayment amount of $4,723 noted in the transcript for at least one case.

- Case 3702074: Commissioners ordered a correction to the employer name and account number; majority statements in the transcript support affirming the separation decision on the facts, while at least one commissioner filed a short-form dissent. The transcript records an order to bill and reimburse the employer where appropriate.

- Case 3712965: A rehearing was ordered to review the employer's testing policy and correspondence with the claimant; commissioners agreed to rehear the matter.

- Case 3713322: Commissioners discussed the claimant’s no-call/no-show absences and evidence; the transcript records an affirmation of misconduct by the majority, with a short-form dissent filed.

- Case 3720987: Commissioners reversed the AT decision on a record in which the claimant said she had been given the choice to resign or face criminal charges; the commission ordered reimbursement to the employer in the transcript record.

- Case 3742960: Commissioners split on whether the claimant quit for good cause after a home-health assignment ended; the transcript records a final affirmation of voluntary leaving and no chargeback by the majority, with a short-form dissent.

Multiple decisions included short-form dissents that were entered into the record; where commissioners asked for a rehearing, the transcript records that rehearings would be scheduled. The transcript records votes and outcomes in the cases above as recorded by commissioners in open session; some case outcomes included administrative corrections (employer name or account number), chargeback determinations, and overpayment recalculations.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","TWC Commission Meeting | 6-24-2025","oneSentenceSummary","At the Texas Workforce Commission meeting, commissioners voted on wage claim recommendations and resolved multiple unemployment insurance contested cases on Docket 26 with outcomes ranging from affirmation to modification and rehearing; several decisions included short-form dissents and administrative corrections.","taxTitle","Workforce Commission (TWC), Departments and Agencies, Executive, Texas","taxId",17380,"location","Texas","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6657567,"TWC delays vote after questions over distribution of ESEA performance outcome payments",308,1897000,2205000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5067057-22cbec004679d68203a2a1cc8f18ada0&start=1897&end=2205","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5067057-22cbec004679d68203a2a1cc8f18ada0/thumbnail_1897000.jpg","/articles/6657567/Texas/TWC-delays-vote-after-questions-over-distribution-of-ESEA-performance-outcome-payments","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6657567-45820d8159cc792153e802adabfea5a2/orig.mp4?Expires=1773659473&Signature=cUoYFmBowwpS24ICDl92CtluQCHhhFa03g5B-OKKGAm33Lrr3MmdVaBfRrKU0xVneXpOI-SDk3DoDz3FKF8dns-t~z~m8GAZzEwdp0UcyWNS1478F0-fG9MEhM61dncuMBr7QtObOIjHs7nByu4Smis8EH5jfkI4qsvFsrY8mAVyRXPpYHJtgNta0lKnrVDETzhK8vNPd15RmCArpg4zITLM6DShBB48M77cmkLZLrGO7GCKGUIhTw4B07VFBxwRaQ4UPuUrGfq4CbKvLnhFAUR7JyoawNtrtjFAdAlJCNh37W734UBkPH3INRxGFs7~QUDQNGj4xyR2JdblPKI1-Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","At a Texas Workforce Commission meeting, staff presented a plan to distribute ESEA performance outcome payments to local workforce development boards, and commissioners questioned the rationale behind some reallocations.

Staff outlined three decision points: reallocate $125,202 to three boards (Panhandle, Concho Valley, Deep East) from a prior incentive, allocate roughly $1,600,000 across all 28 boards as performance and training incentives, and allocate approximately $1,300,000 to boards experiencing higher-than-normal profile pools to allow for additional staffing. Staff also said a remaining balance of $8,293 would fund TWC’s RESEA administration. \"Staff recommends the commission approval of the performance outcome distribution consistent with the decision points,\" the staff presenter said.

Commissioners pressed staff on apparent contradictions in the plan. \"It looks like 16 of 28 boards did not get to at least 70% less than half the time. Is that correct, what I'm seeing?\" one commissioner asked. The commissioner later noted, \"57% of the boards did not get at least 70% of their work done more than half the time,\" and asked why boards that struggled to meet performance thresholds were receiving additional funds.

Staff explained that the boards receiving additional funds under decision 0.3 had experienced a more-than-10% increase in customers in their profile pools and needed funding to staff up to serve that influx; staff also said it has worked with low-performing boards one-on-one to improve reporting rates.

A motion to approve the reemployment services and eligibility assessment program performance outcome payment distribution plan was made, but it failed for lack of a second and the commission agreed to revisit the issue at a later meeting. The transcript records the motion and the lack of a second; it does not show a final allocation vote.","Texas Workforce Commission staff proposed reallocations and incentives totaling roughly $2.9 million plus smaller balances; commissioners questioned why boards that missed work thresholds would receive extra funds and the motion to approve failed for lack of a second and the item was deferred.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6657573,"TWC commissioners debate penalty for minors using small trash compactors in Case 25BL00869",50,33000,83000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5067057-22cbec004679d68203a2a1cc8f18ada0&start=33&end=83","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5067057-22cbec004679d68203a2a1cc8f18ada0/thumbnail_33000.jpg","/articles/6657573/Texas/TWC-commissioners-debate-penalty-for-minors-using-small-trash-compactors-in-Case-25BL00869","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6657573-499785591c95b0b376636f6ad9351b76/orig.mp4?Expires=1773659473&Signature=laGXsAjGf0uWPNG30rvQleXruQfM6KgjKvF3z~Z0fzxxscIiehwMtxhlN7qHEcHWKwXXH1dBbuzGmXKEQNcQHcpAkLG5BlzPD9nrBFjhiJxMfuDqbnH2CoBZdpAfq~~80~KuTnbOQ~b6kVMFgLoXWFynOZf86Ravkfg3-FTBA1F36W8GKvfHddr0Z7hfQ8iWm7pQMRQE0Ko0jByzgjWcpU0ptwUxR62tpI44UwVkfJRlUUXTny5rf7LRxBHzkD4BnCEO3Q2a8naW~cOZq4lwm3YziEuOp1TkdxdIYJtg6ic9yuBebfEWO7qSq3qtqszb9WOp4maFL4Pf0fycfdJhOA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Texas Workforce Commission on docketed case 25BL00869 debated whether a monetary penalty should be upheld after three minors unloaded small consumer-grade trash compactors at a restaurant.

The discussion centered on competing views of safety, statutory clarity and agency handling. \"The child labor appeal tribunal decision may not be supportable based on the current record in the case,\" Commissioner McClure Flood said, adding that while child safety is the top priority, a monetary penalty might not be the best resolution. \"Once the employer found out that the regulations did not, in fact, change as DOL had signaled, the company stopped letting minors use the small compactors at all,\" he said, and said his vote was to seek guidance from the Office of General Counsel.

Commissioner Elsner took the opposite view, arguing the factual record was undisputed and that the child labor protections do not distinguish among types of compactors. \"The decision is supportable,\" Elsner said. \"Affirm the special programs appeal decision penalty of $1,281.25.\"

Commissioners also criticized aspects of TWC’s handling of the case. One commissioner described the preliminary determination order as providing an incorrect penalty that was never corrected and said the record and the law were \"murky,\" urging a rehearing to develop evidence about legislative intent and the line between operating and maintaining a compactor.

The transcript shows commissioners discussed asking OGC whether a first-time violation in these circumstances could be reduced to a warning rather than a fine and discussed rehearing the case to develop the record. The transcript does not contain a clear, final roll-call result for affirming, rescinding, or modifying the penalty; the record shows support for seeking OGC guidance and for rehearing to clarify statutory intent.

Case number: 25BL00869. Alleged violation: minors under 18 operated/handled small consumer-grade trash compactors at employer direction; contested penalty: $1,281.25.

The commission’s discussion included references to guidance from the U.S. Department of Labor and to TWC procedures; commissioners asked that the Office of General Counsel review whether the penalty for a first-time violation in this factual posture could be reduced to a warning and whether a rehearing should be granted to explore legislative intent.

No formal disposition (affirmed, reversed, modified) is recorded in the transcript excerpt provided; commissioners recorded both a vote to seek legal guidance and statements supporting affirmation of the penalty.","At a Texas Workforce Commission meeting, commissioners debated whether a $1,281.25 penalty in child labor case 25BL00869 should be reduced to a warning and whether the agency or federal guidance had misled the employer; commissioners asked the Office of General Counsel for guidance and discussed rehearing to clarify legislative intent.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

TWC issues mixed rulings on Docket 26 wage claims and unemployment insurance cases; several rehearings and modifications ordered

TWC delays vote after questions over distribution of ESEA performance outcome payments

TWC commissioners debate penalty for minors using small trash compactors in Case 25BL00869