[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6187605,"mediaKeyId","5067050-161902f70b5f7ad65a97d5b0589cc43c","parentId",5067050,"title","DRC reviews Spring Haven major development plan; engineer says comments mainly procedural, force‑main replacement under negotiation","audioSeconds",183,"startMs",482000,"endMs",665000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5067050-161902f70b5f7ad65a97d5b0589cc43c&start=482&end=665","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5067050-161902f70b5f7ad65a97d5b0589cc43c/thumbnail_482000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6187605/Apopka/Orange-County/Florida/DRC-reviews-Spring-Haven-major-development-plan-engineer-says-comments-mainly-procedural-forcemain-replacement-under-negotiation","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6187605-d94d6271b41de361258552f256b8fab7/orig.mp4?Expires=1775447763&Signature=Jlb675Bv50dZcJF-bfiiPL7AuQurHWo1vA4XLXOzU5ps-mKiF~VKihtH9uQTrB1IEPFuOsP2e~EMd--8QO-5O2nybk-0RUG9hrUBVlqgspOb31uIsCNy1ahjX1RnjxtcjLAkuNpCbbPh2q9WgOXLxfH-GKN4D~18JJJqFMLjzxzgUQDq1C2xSaDodj9z3G4ryIsw2r336-rT1~IH7UIOST-10TX145P1FbQLxIWiCjsljvyUO-Bcgq3ESZ0-jxMjC272gZRGG-6X8jC1riPAeeq8ttQ4s3zM2nZPxq8vvhj30YDg9r9xznodiXWLggKzbDRCh3ba1ydZ7iITt6rNiA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","City of Apopka, FL","date","2025-06-25T16:31:53.407Z","article","Apopka’s Development Review Committee on June 25 reviewed the second submittal of the Spring Haven major development plan. Luke Classen, an engineer with 1828 Engineering, told the committee that most of the outstanding items are typical engineering details that will be addressed in the construction‑stage plan (CSP) submittal.

\"That's really the only comment that I think is of substance,\" Classen said, referring to the updated fire‑marshal comments. Classen said he had exchanged information with staff and that some comments previously prepared under the wrong submittal type would be resolved at final engineering review.

Classen told staff the project team prepared an exhibit and additional survey work related to a force main along West Kelly Park and that they are obtaining contractor cost estimates to inform negotiations. He said the applicant and city will discuss an agreement after construction costs are returned: \"we'll be able to at least have a negotiation with our client, in the city to verify what the assumed cost would be or what the cost would be for that.\"

At the meeting a city staff member confirmed that the work discussed for the force main is a complete replacement of the system rather than a mere upsizing, and that replacement would be eligible for labor, material and design fees when applicable. Community Development and Public Works staff raised no additional objections at the DRC appearance.

This DRC review was procedural; the transcript records no vote or formal action. Classen and staff said the remaining engineering comments will be addressed in the next submittal phases, and that any required agreement for the force‑main work will be negotiated after contractor estimates are received.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","City of Apopka Development Review Committee Meeting June 25, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Apopka DRC reviewed the second submittal of the Spring Haven major development plan. The applicant’s engineer said fire‑marshalled comments were updated and that outstanding engineering items will be addressed at the construction‑stage plan (CSP) submittal; the developer is negotiating costs and an agreement for a complete force‑main replacement.","taxTitle","Apopka, Orange County, Florida","taxId",4597,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6187610,"DRC reviews small downtown future‑land‑use amendment to allow higher density at 155 MA Board",71,393000,464000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5067050-161902f70b5f7ad65a97d5b0589cc43c&start=393&end=464","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5067050-161902f70b5f7ad65a97d5b0589cc43c/thumbnail_393000.jpg","/articles/6187610/Apopka/Orange-County/Florida/DRC-reviews-small-downtown-futurelanduse-amendment-to-allow-higher-density-at-155-MA-Board","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6187610-b172c67dc5e1a1601c666930dec75bf7/orig.mp4?Expires=1775447763&Signature=KxbMJOE2TJvTIfOtDBXIX1p388eBZYV9P7ZVg6GCSjREd95dF3z9Dv6VFMb6QX72zDPrEDPjzDk5TwfK63HNMOY5lWv8apHH7t40QwoT33uGRduGdfvidZQCGswNu5mNQ1WfELQ46tIeXCicuU829Olqb~djhkOzgojbm8OwgS7gWnllqX~B6QHvRA5j-9-TjcjoxnQelUXKjrUP8KMQo~XNTnv86sNGjmRxrkXKcvXNJuMBaM5Ub8zwILG1W5VXYKr1j0q~zwuNcbTPid5bIA79-XnOENusxFWEnbiNbl3LkvQyK2vArhJUFicY24N-gGQIhXEXdn0cjAF9FMRQMA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Jun Son, project manager for Community Development, told the Apopka Development Review Committee on June 25 that an applicant has requested a future land use amendment for a 0.27‑acre property at 155 MA Board to permit mixed‑use downtown zoning and increase allowable density from 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre.

Jun Son said the property is vacant and located within the mixed‑use downtown zoning area, and that the proposed future land use would be consistent with existing downtown zoning. \"The mixed use future land use is the corresponding future land use with the mixed use downtown zoning,\" Jun Son said.

The applicant was not in attendance at the DRC meeting. Community Development, Police, Public Works, Fire and Building staff reported no comments in the record for the DRC review. The item was presented for review; no DRC motions or votes were recorded in the transcript.

Because the parcel is within the downtown mixed‑use zone, staff described the requested change as consistent with the area’s intended land‑use pattern. The record shows the matter will proceed through the city’s standard review and approval steps; no additional dates or Council actions were recorded in the transcript.","The committee reviewed a request to change the future land use for a 0.27‑acre downtown parcel at 155 MA Board to mixed use, increasing allowable density from 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre; the applicant was not present and no action was taken.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6187614,"DRC reviews rezoning and future land use change for 1920 Schiller Road; applicant flags nearby police gun range",222,136000,358000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5067050-161902f70b5f7ad65a97d5b0589cc43c&start=136&end=358","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5067050-161902f70b5f7ad65a97d5b0589cc43c/thumbnail_136000.jpg","/articles/6187614/Apopka/Orange-County/Florida/DRC-reviews-rezoning-and-future-land-use-change-for-1920-Schiller-Road-applicant-flags-nearby-police-gun-range","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6187614-c795b953ec2c05b6837a8934e35279e1/orig.mp4?Expires=1775447763&Signature=gwKSwVdiIeh0i20a3rOD2etuTbrxXYdJQpAhS6aTNOR3TOgTEe3RcrV9h-vDDldsrAzNRMuXUrH5MBev9FsapFr8qdfHIbf1Pr0La6oPkEsAw9oTAUXQrvq8ElytHk92HCp9houcPXjQDcfU0H6G1oMlZ~Rrr4lDhcbLvdkX7WpcCvolQ~ZMaxT-fSqdW506-Y1YWWkRCkoDiEiTGTMs4M5E1544l3Z9XTW~uIrmLiBvm0NwSihM9Zm8cX6tlB0LS2Jtk5FDvKghPIurp34uxouUcLWPjqIUUMrWStv0udx5egdpq~m~1aKybuFpzG-6Q4gByeKSGmqNTHv35Fi6yg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Apopka Development Review Committee on June 25 discussed a request to amend the future land use and rezone about 40 acres at 1920 Schiller Road (the transcript also references 1920 Shore Avenue) to permit low‑suburban residential development, Jun Son, project manager, said.

The request would change the site’s future land use to residential low‑suburban, which allows up to 3.5 dwelling units per acre, and would rezone the property from County A‑1 to RTF (Residential Two‑Family). Jun Son said the property is in the process of annexation into the city and that a first reading on annexation is scheduled for the City Council on July 2.

Jun Son said, \"the applicant has requested the future land use amendment and rezoning for properties located at 1920 Shore Avenue, total size of 40 acres.\" Jonathan Hules, the applicant, said the proposed development would be below the requested density maximum and indicated the plan includes about 116 homes. Hules also noted the proximity of a law‑enforcement firearms range and said, \"I think I measured it on the county's website. It's 1,152 feet to the edge of the property.\" He urged that future buyers be notified about the range to reduce later complaints.

Community Development staff had no additional comments at the meeting. Representatives from Police, Public Works, Fire and Building likewise did not raise objections during the DRC review. DRC members and staff emphasized that detailed public hearings on the comp plan amendment and rezoning will follow the annexation process.

This item at the DRC was a review and discussion; no formal DRC vote or motion was recorded in the transcript. The next procedural step identified in the meeting record is the City Council first reading on July 2 for the annexation; subsequent public hearings on the comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning were described as forthcoming.","The Apopka Development Review Committee discussed a request to amend future land use and rezone roughly 40 acres at 1920 Schiller Road to allow low‑suburban residential development; the applicant and staff noted a law‑enforcement firing range nearby and the site’s pending annexation to the city.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

DRC reviews Spring Haven major development plan; engineer says comments mainly procedural, force‑main replacement under negotiation

DRC reviews small downtown future‑land‑use amendment to allow higher density at 155 MA Board

DRC reviews rezoning and future land use change for 1920 Schiller Road; applicant flags nearby police gun range