[{"_1":2,"_98":-5,"_99":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,74,86],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":56,"_68":69,"_70":56,"_71":72,"_73":72},"mediaId",6522359,"mediaKeyId","5071127-7cd3b42c7c7c1d9fbd5c3b77eccb62b5","parentId",5071127,"title","Votes at a glance: Baldwin County Commission approves multiple rezoning and administrative items","audioSeconds",5904,"startMs",677000,"endMs",6581000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5071127-7cd3b42c7c7c1d9fbd5c3b77eccb62b5&start=677&end=6581","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5071127-7cd3b42c7c7c1d9fbd5c3b77eccb62b5/thumbnail_677000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6522359/Baldwin-County/Alabama/Votes-at-a-glance-Baldwin-County-Commission-approves-multiple-rezoning-and-administrative-items","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6522359-fe00530b20eeea693fd3d77ca0017e81/orig.mp4?Expires=1775225386&Signature=mFQtrpBOPCrO4LbS4XBxLGUmxrpsYgXnM10fE4oGBKVpq4pKL78Ji7BrT23yTHvOuTSn5ugFqgdhsUVhuuAKvj2eLegxGoNOXzwStvHpue83N~m38pgfTxEOfQbrlQU2msAcUWaaMp8bbYu9nUhnI9fJ~Uc9NfeMHBvIgkZb4eZ2lobrmvTjEorusrDLccb2ZQGY5XDgkcCrfMAnW1FU0GxsDK~2ZICM3R0Aup9os50ycERB2U6419Gh9g3Ytqrz~qev5W3Ur22pOC4mbuNlPHmrYh8xvzEhWeq3~3A-Pq7oFMVzcIC5KOEDYP81gTtLzU4XvkiKui4goRtQIvttHQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Baldwin County, Alabama","date","2025-06-24T19:28:37.87Z","article","The Baldwin County Commission took a series of administrative and land-use actions during the public meeting. Below are the formal actions recorded on the agenda and their outcomes.

Key administrative and procedural votes
- Adoption of the minutes for the June 3, 2025 meeting with an amendment to correct account numbers in Resolution 20205-139 (amendment noted in record): motion passed by voice vote.
- Payment of the bills (Financial Administration): motion passed by voice vote.
- BA2 ratification: motion passed by voice vote.
- Consent agenda approval with item CO4 removed for separate consideration: motion passed by voice vote.

Right-of-way and planning procedural actions
- Vacation of a 30-foot unopened, unimproved right-of-way known as Dana Drive (case VAC-25-1): the commission opened a public hearing and approved the request to vacate the right-of-way after staff recommended the vacation and noted that the vacation would not deprive other property owners of reasonable access. Motion passed by voice vote.
- Cooper property rezoning application (Rosington community): the applicant requested to withdraw the rezoning within seven days of the hearing. The commission accepted the withdrawal. Motion to accept withdrawal passed by voice vote.

Rezoning and land-use outcomes (summary)
- Goodwin property (Z24-15) and PRD 25-02, Long Bayou Preserve: rezoning and PRD approved (see separate article for details).
- Parker property (Z25-9): rezoned from RSFE to B-2 (Neighborhood Business). Staff and the planning commission recommended approval; the commission approved the rezoning after public comment from a nearby resident expressing opposition. Motion passed by voice vote.
- Bayview Partners / Loveless property (Z25-10): rezoned from RA to RMH (Manufactured Housing Park) to expand an existing park. Motion passed by voice vote.
- UN property (Z25-12): request to rezone from RSFE to RA (to remove accessory-dwelling size limitation) was denied. A motion to deny carried on a recorded showing of 3 in favor, 1 opposed (3-1 vote).
- SR Development LLC property (Z25-16): rezoned from RA to B-2 for future development; staff recommended approval and the commission approved the rezoning by voice vote.
- Centimeters Counseling LLC property (Z25-23): rezoned from RSFE to B-1 (property north of County Road 64 and east of Highway 181 in Daphne); staff recommended approval and the commission approved by voice vote.
- Hilltop QOZ Fund LLC property (Z25-24): rezoned from RSFE to RSF-1 (residential subdivision) to allow a residential subdivision; staff recommended approval and the commission approved by voice vote.
- Cotton property (Z25-26): rezoned from RSF-1 to RA (rural agriculture) to allow a personal storage building; staff recommended approval and the commission approved by voice vote. Town of Magnolia Springs submitted a letter of support.
- Cypress Break LLC property (Z25-27): rezoned from RA to RR (rezoning to support an intended use near Gulf Shores); staff recommended approval and the commission approved by voice vote.
- Dyess property (Z25-28): rezoned from RA to RSF-2 for future residential development; staff recommended approval and the commission approved by voice vote.

What to watch next: Approved rezonings typically require follow-up steps that include final plats, engineering review, permitting and, in some cases, dedication or maintenance agreements for roads. The UN property denial included discussion identifying a broader county-level issue: a 60% accessory-dwelling size rule that applies in some planning districts and staff noted the county is in the process of cleaning up inconsistent local provisions across planning districts.

Provenance: Each listed item was presented during the planning and zoning portion of the meeting and recorded in the commission transcript; the items above reflect motions and recorded outcomes from the public hearing sequence and subsequent roll calls or voice votes.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Baldwin County Commission Regular Meeting June 24, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","At its meeting the Baldwin County Commission approved a series of routine administrative items, accepted a petition withdrawal, vacated a county right-of-way, and approved or denied multiple rezoning requests; details and outcomes are listed below.","taxTitle","taxId",12621,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":75,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":76,"_41":77,"_43":78,"_45":79,"_47":80,"_49":81,"_51":82,"_53":83,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":84,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":85,"_67":56,"_68":69,"_70":56,"_71":72,"_73":72},6522364,"Commission approves Long Bayou Preserve rezoning and PRD despite staff recommendation to deny",1190,2763000,3953000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5071127-7cd3b42c7c7c1d9fbd5c3b77eccb62b5&start=2763&end=3953","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5071127-7cd3b42c7c7c1d9fbd5c3b77eccb62b5/thumbnail_2763000.jpg","/articles/6522364/Baldwin-County/Alabama/Commission-approves-Long-Bayou-Preserve-rezoning-and-PRD-despite-staff-recommendation-to-deny","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6522364-986f14a7f69cd543388612b5996e8936/orig.mp4?Expires=1775225386&Signature=a~xezEdAulB1BEBIPQg4iUKipzFElUxKLPFW3nPcZ3GBrTXioI2ENpZg1j448u154R6e4P1u1Uoifa-ppHEj8Rki70ZV6~axCbrnOiDgN14a7NJsrjwWBkH7Ol8-h9fkGp4-eRL66oXUb7qORJtZzX7jrmP3g3GQ8fDC1J3CMvlJ3ADxGuyg2wqrAQtBoWcKuKl8IqPPq7r7k~HcUa1pw6O96Sr9PueMnluqI2BBetKXpSttzbRsdspLX9~exXwyJp7x0uUB~CytyMjuFN6eAA4QeFy43kNZpO9G6RG4vouH~fa2LilKpMohNMk-O7qJAE16MHdX~bceAOZpYLUNWg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Baldwin County commissioners approved a rezoning and a planned residential development (PRD) for the Goodwin property, a 36-acre site east of the Baldwin Beach Express north of Orange Beach, authorizing a 48-lot residential community to be called Long Bayou Preserve.

Planning staff recommended denial of both the rezoning and the PRD, citing incompatibility with adjacent land uses, nonconformity with the county master plan and a lack of a clear development pattern because of a large wetland area surrounding the parcel. The staff report noted the property includes approximately 25 acres of delineated wetlands and that the site lies within a VE flood zone.

Project proponents said they had obtained federal and state permits before seeking zoning approvals. Tom Granger, the project engineer representing developers Richard and Maury Cobb and the landowners, told commissioners the developers had spent two years obtaining permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Alabama Department of Environmental Management and had secured leases for boat slips through State Lands. Granger said the requested development footprint would impact about 3.57 acres of delineated wetlands; he also stated that roughly 1.53 acres of fill would occur on the 36-acre site itself, with the total county-area fill around 2.04 acres of the full permit scope.

Under the approved plan, the 48 lots would be divided into waterfront and interior lots: 36 waterfront lots and 12 interior \"cottage\" lots. The applicant said the PRD density would be about 2.04 units per acre, below the RSF-2 maximum density and below a 2.9 units-per-acre threshold staff cited for meeting overall density in a PRD. The proposal includes an overall open-space area of approximately 29 acres with about 3.87 acres of \"usable\" open space, according to the applicant's materials presented to the commission.

During the hearing developers emphasized the intended character of the project as largely second-home beach housing with a homeowners association covenant that would limit disturbance of wetlands. \"The owners have spent the last two years to obtain all the permitting through the Corps of Engineers and Alabama Department of Environmental Management,\" Tom Granger said, noting the permits were in place before the rezoning request.

Supporters and the applicant said traffic and drainage impacts would be modest compared with adjacent higher-density developments; staff and some commissioners raised compatibility concerns because surrounding land remains largely zoned for rural agriculture and timberland.

Commission action: The commission approved the rezoning (Z24-15) and, separately, approved PRD 25-02 with the conditions outlined in staff recommendations. The initial roll call for the rezoning was recorded as passed by voice with three commissioners in favor; the PRD passed after a separate motion and recorded voice vote.

Why it matters: The decision allows development on a site with substantial wetland acreage after developers obtained federal and state permits to fill limited wetland areas. Staff had recommended denial based on master-plan consistency and compatibility concerns; the commission's approval reflects a different assessment after proponents presented permit approvals and conservation commitments.

Provenance: The project's presentation, permit discussion, public comments, and the motions to approve appear in the meeting transcript from the planning presentation through the commissioners' votes.","The Baldwin County Commission approved rezoning and a planned residential development (PRD) for the 36-acre Goodwin property (Long Bayou Preserve), authorizing 48 lots with roughly 29 acres of open space and permitting limited wetland fill after developers presented federal and state permits.",{"_33":87,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":88,"_41":89,"_43":90,"_45":91,"_47":92,"_49":93,"_51":94,"_53":95,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":96,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":97,"_67":56,"_68":69,"_70":56,"_71":72,"_73":72},6522367,"Baldwin County approves 30 Cubed roadway agreement with Foley to extend James Road",383,821000,1204000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5071127-7cd3b42c7c7c1d9fbd5c3b77eccb62b5&start=821&end=1204","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5071127-7cd3b42c7c7c1d9fbd5c3b77eccb62b5/thumbnail_821000.jpg","/articles/6522367/Baldwin-County/Alabama/Baldwin-County-approves-30-Cubed-roadway-agreement-with-Foley-to-extend-James-Road","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6522367-6b154d9bb0f8e97860611e561f0a5c13/orig.mp4?Expires=1775225386&Signature=MSdT1b0eA-T4kzbFNnal3IhgOPXC6u53xYfzE-5dzPmErNWFQYcmm~KwiUf6mXQLYvbCxgl~GC5dJfFJ4hVPpWJpklIJpB4hEWaoPvuTAc1iGMMgIGHco9Qyn2J2HEzOTDnX4dwZhpWKnh6ChujvgpIdltMfW9awOlig3HMyaI~RNGjySM0B90YJWkgzdF1hig3dz5dlZgdQgCIc1NJIWKqG0Pw5GsGSA7b2EK0808gt4HcjSlkuiMhC0ywqItdh1BtYuABRPJoO5jMeZjY62kZjYKk4A0rPFAEqcCqCpl40EmMbTjM5iqQatlCXUVCb7Z3RfBBtxyksnEr5~POuQQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Baldwin County commissioners voted to approve an intergovernmental roadway construction agreement with the City of Foley to extend James Road by roughly 5,280 feet and add pedestrian improvements.

The agreement, brought forward under agenda item CO4, is part of the county's 30 Cubed program, a county-municipal partnership that the county describes as a matching effort to fund capacity and connectivity projects where county and municipal jurisdictions overlap. County staff said the program designates $30,000,000 in county funds to be voluntarily matched by $30,000,000 in municipal funds by 2030.

Frank Lundy, who introduced the item for county staff, said the Foley project will provide a north-south connection east of Alabama 59 and west of the Beach Express, just south of OWA and north of Gulf Shores. The project will extend James Road from Brents Willis Road South and includes pedestrian improvements intended to improve connectivity between unincorporated areas and the city.

The mayor of Foley, who addressed the commission during the item, called the 30 Cubed program \"very progressive\" and said the agreement formalizes a long-standing drainage and road partnership between the city and county. \"This program to me is very progressive. I applaud y'all for doing this,\" the mayor said.

A commissioner moved to approve CO4 and, after a second, the commission voted to pass the agreement by voice vote. The motion passed with all commissioners present saying \"aye.\" The item did not include an estimated county share of construction cost in the meeting materials; the agreement authorizes the intergovernmental arrangement and project scope as described by staff.

Why it matters: The project is part of a county effort to target funding where municipal and county jurisdictions intersect, prioritizing connectivity that county staff and municipal leaders said has strained local roads during surge visitation seasons. Extending James Road will create an additional north-south route for residents and visitors in southern Foley and the nearby resort corridor.

What the commission decided and next steps: By approving the intergovernmental agreement the commission authorized the county to enter the construction partnership with Foley and proceed with the project as scoped. The agreement includes the roadway alignment described by staff; project permitting, detailed design, and budgeting steps were not finalized in the public materials presented at the meeting. County staff and Foley city officials indicated they expect additional project proposals under the 30 Cubed program from other municipalities.

Provenance: The staff presentation and the mayor's remarks introducing the Foley project appear in the meeting record beginning with Frank Lundy's presentation of the 30 Cubed program and the CO4 item and the mayor's comments thanking the commission for the partnership. Excerpts from those remarks were recorded in the commission transcript and used to summarize the project and the vote.","The Baldwin County Commission approved an intergovernmental agreement with the City of Foley to build about 5,280 feet (one mile) of new roadway and pedestrian improvements on James Road as part of the county's 30 Cubed infrastructure program.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Baldwin County Commission approves multiple rezoning and administrative items

Commission approves Long Bayou Preserve rezoning and PRD despite staff recommendation to deny

Baldwin County approves 30 Cubed roadway agreement with Foley to extend James Road