Advocates urge legislature to oppose AB 130 amid funding and housing concerns

The Assembly Budget Committee of the California State Assembly convened on June 25, 2025, to discuss various budgetary issues and proposals impacting the state's communities. The meeting featured a range of stakeholders voicing their support and opposition to specific budget items, particularly focusing on social services, housing, and immigrant rights.

The session began with Yesenia Jimenez from End Child Poverty in California, who emphasized the importance of providing apprenticeship training and livable wages for marginalized communities, including women and people of color. She urged the committee to oppose Assembly Bill 130, arguing that it would hinder progress in these areas. Jimenez also expressed gratitude for the restoration of $10 million for the Hope Accounts program, which supports foster youth affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, she raised concerns about cuts to immigrant services and called for the legislature to adopt necessary revenue solutions to support all Californians.

Sam Wilkinson, also representing End Child Poverty in California, praised the legislature's efforts to streamline CalWORKs and invest in childcare. He highlighted the need for continued support for communities facing fiscal challenges and urged the legislature to ensure that the ultra-wealthy and corporations contribute their fair share to the state's economy.

Kai Claussen from the California State Parks Foundation expressed strong support for the $6.75 million allocated for the State Library Parks Pass program, which promotes outdoor access. He also thanked the legislature for appropriating $132 million from the Hino settlement for the Hybrid and Zero-Emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project (HVIP).

Conversely, Kareem Driesi from the California Building Industry Association voiced strong opposition to specific sections of AB 130 and SB 130, which he claimed would impose unnecessary costs on housing construction, ultimately reducing the availability of affordable housing for working families. He proposed amendments to address these concerns and urged the committee to reconsider the timing of the bill's progression.

Shane Guzman from Teamsters California echoed these sentiments, arguing that AB 130 undermines job security and affordability in housing. He criticized the legislative process surrounding the bill, urging the committee to reject it.

The meeting concluded with a clear divide among stakeholders regarding the proposed budget measures, particularly concerning the impacts on vulnerable communities and housing affordability. The committee's decisions in the coming days will be crucial in shaping California's budget priorities and addressing the needs of its diverse population.