This article was created by AI using a video recording of the meeting. It summarizes the key points discussed, but for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting.
Link to Full Meeting
In a contentious meeting held on June 21, 2025, the Board of Governors of the University of Puerto Rico (UPR) appointed Dr. Zayira Jordán Conde as the new president, a decision that has sparked significant backlash from various sectors of the university community. The vote, which concluded with eight members in favor, has raised concerns about the legitimacy of the selection process and the qualifications of the new president.
The appointment followed a consultation process involving ten of the eleven UPR campuses, where Dr. Jordán was not favored by any of the participating institutions. Notably, the Ponce campus opted out of the process, citing concerns over its integrity, while the Carolina campus's report was not approved by its academic senate. Critics argue that Dr. Jordán's background, primarily in private institutions, lacks the necessary experience in public higher education, raising questions about her ability to lead UPR effectively.
Opponents of the appointment have pointed to Dr. Jordán's connections to Governor Jennifer González Colón, suggesting that her selection reflects undue political influence rather than a commitment to the university's mission. This sentiment was echoed by members of the Puerto Rican Independence Party, who expressed their disapproval, asserting that the decision undermines the autonomy of the university and is indicative of a broader trend of political interference in educational governance.
Supporters of Dr. Jordán, however, have defended her appointment, highlighting her professional qualifications and the potential for fresh leadership within the university. They argue that her selection represents a step towards inclusivity and progress, despite the criticisms surrounding the process.
The meeting underscored the ongoing tensions within Puerto Rico's educational landscape, where political affiliations often intersect with institutional governance. As the university community grapples with this controversial appointment, the implications for UPR's future and its role in public education remain uncertain. The discussions reflect a critical moment for the university, as stakeholders call for a reevaluation of governance practices to ensure that the institution can fulfill its educational mission amidst political challenges.
Converted from Hemiciclo meeting on June 25, 2025
Link to Full Meeting