Ted Nugent criticizes Michigan DNR and NRC for conservation policies

The Natural Resources and Tourism Joint Meeting with the Appropriations and Oversight Subcommittees convened on June 25, 2025, to address pressing issues regarding wildlife management and conservation in Michigan. The meeting featured passionate testimonies and discussions surrounding the state's regulatory practices and their impact on hunting and wildlife populations.

One of the most notable contributions came from Ted Nugent, a well-known advocate for hunting and wildlife conservation. Nugent expressed strong dissatisfaction with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the Natural Resources Commission (NRC), accusing them of implementing "anti-nature, anti-science regulations" that he believes are driving families away from hunting. He specifically criticized the management of sandhill cranes, which he referred to as "rib eyes in the sky," highlighting the inconsistency in regulations that allow for their hunting but prohibit consumption.

Nugent's testimony underscored a broader concern regarding the classification of various species, including mourning doves, which he argued are misclassified as songbirds rather than game birds. He called for a return to "sound science" in wildlife management, urging the DNR and NRC to reconsider their policies and restore Michigan's reputation as a leading hunting state.

Following Nugent's remarks, the meeting shifted focus to other agenda items, including discussions on property rights, trespassing issues, and chronic wasting disease management. The committee also addressed hunting guidelines and the importance of responsible conservation practices.

As the meeting progressed, members of the Upper Peninsula contingent were invited to join the discussion, indicating a collaborative approach to addressing the diverse concerns of Michigan's hunting and wildlife communities.

In conclusion, the meeting highlighted significant tensions between regulatory bodies and hunting advocates, with calls for reform in wildlife management practices. The discussions set the stage for potential changes in policy aimed at balancing conservation efforts with the interests of hunters and the broader community. Further actions and follow-ups are expected as stakeholders continue to engage in these critical conversations.