[{"_1":2,"_86":-5,"_87":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,74],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},"mediaId",6185643,"mediaKeyId","5081406-135e721f3c110ee3426dc02ffdf5ae36","parentId",5081406,"title","Resident urges county action on Confederate monument; commissioners say monument is not county property","audioSeconds",934,"startMs",1709000,"endMs",2643000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5081406-135e721f3c110ee3426dc02ffdf5ae36&start=1709&end=2643","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5081406-135e721f3c110ee3426dc02ffdf5ae36/thumbnail_1709000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6185643/Hart-County/Georgia/Resident-urges-county-action-on-Confederate-monument-commissioners-say-monument-is-not-county-property","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6185643-e805cf37533ac4b3dba207714243d7f1/orig.mp4?Expires=1773768239&Signature=j8Uk7gkuFVidFwCFyT0q-mDge8Y-Zv3nOD3QmpQ904z4ajBgKHynhXfECVgH1k2BgVWkfpYL3I3Z6XUb~tW0aFfIRJHxPVwutMIx-dABkUG5-ajGeLM2GT5TbO1t8NL7uEq2208NcD6puGmQ3iHVudVu-8XPCfmWzbdESvk890ax2z8Xhk4TeJZNqpelZIlW~Y6ipB3MD~24ib5vt4qweQbQ1PJeurCGyV48VwXs7uomdBgId1hgW-6FMhdBgFtDZaH4~AQMMNVoFLIs~8pMctjF48U0XaWQQCMpWwpJhdVAMovwusCWDBEUv1ZiFO2dmUjDPeVnUnkGvziQ~fkkfw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-06-25T10:48:39Z","article","A Hart County resident urged commissioners on June 24 to press for replacement of a Confederate monument removed from the county square a decade ago, and to take a stronger role honoring Confederate soldiers he said are interred in the county.

Ty Thompson, who identified himself as a Hart County resident, delivered an extended public comment asking the board to compel or otherwise work with local groups to reinstall a Confederate monument. \"I love the veterans of this county,\" Thompson said. He told the board he had documented \"191 souls\" who he said were Confederate veterans and said he had asked commissioners eight months earlier to press the local organization that previously maintained the monument.

Thompson criticized the local chapter that he said controlled the monument and said at one point that a local donor had been refused. He asked the county to use its authority over courthouse property and county funds to ensure those veterans are publicly honored.

Commissioners responded by clarifying the county’s legal position. \"The way I understand that Mister Thompson is that, the monument is not the county's. That monument is their responsibility,\" the chairman said during public comment, adding, \"We have voted for them to put the monument back up.\" Another commissioner said county staff would examine the legal question and report back: \"Let me look at it offline,\" a commissioner said, offering to follow up through staff or the county attorney.

Why it matters: the exchange illustrates an unresolved local dispute over monuments and the limits of county authority. Residents seeking action from local government face constraints when a private group retains ownership or control of a memorial sited on or near public property.

What the board said it could and could not do: commissioners told the public that, while the county controls the courthouse grounds, the particular Confederate monument referenced in public comment is maintained by a private organization (the speaker named the United Daughters of the Confederacy). Commissioners said the board has granted permission in the past for that organization to reinstall a monument but cannot unilaterally compel the private group to act.

Next steps: commissioners said they would review the matter further with staff and provide guidance outside the meeting. No formal motion or vote was taken regarding the monument during the session.

Public comment context: Thompson's remarks ran through historical assertions and were focused on memorialization of Confederate soldiers; the chairman and other commissioners limited the county’s immediate role to legal review and clarification of ownership.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Hart County Board of Commissioners Live Stream","oneSentenceSummary","At the Hart County Board of Commissioners meeting June 24, resident Ty Thompson urged the county to act to replace a Confederate monument; commissioners responded that the monument is owned by a private organization and the county cannot force action.","taxTitle","Hart County, Georgia","taxId",28535,"location","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":75,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":76,"_41":77,"_43":78,"_45":79,"_47":80,"_49":81,"_51":82,"_53":83,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":84,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":85,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6185646,"Hart County limits county‑installed driveway culverts to one per property owner",253,579000,832000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5081406-135e721f3c110ee3426dc02ffdf5ae36&start=579&end=832","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5081406-135e721f3c110ee3426dc02ffdf5ae36/thumbnail_579000.jpg","/articles/6185646/Hart-County/Georgia/Hart-County-limits-countyinstalled-driveway-culverts-to-one-per-property-owner","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6185646-2bd4b1c3e33d58b15224aa45fbc06639/orig.mp4?Expires=1773768239&Signature=nn7n2yAPocUdITb0y7y4j54gcjOLcgFP2Bg53X0u5n4cuj6dnN~YgodjKtJJRoOErgWn7dbl8GY9gHEcUhzQaZfqOee~wAd0xDuRNDuybDJCVcDACSvKvQJA5S0p9rW2wVgIKZtPZkjqbcNYHv2MayFhgRwxvWgxU4BIUNKOCpFRsL66bC7FXpyHIa0trbDYwyvo9TIT891yY3fAFitdW1Dun1P~7SpKsKr-GijdgQ~2gJD2lSm-G28s~IvGfKxFLgO6fmKF4wRxqUeY9fZECP-pygGqVVOLVh3m01i~gkKrJxef9TEP1ZIttuXRDWSLPiYzjbmBvipR7vaBtSFD3w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Hart County Board of Commissioners voted 5‑0 on June 24 to amend the county’s driveway culvert policy, limiting county‑installed driveway pipes to one per property owner when a building permit is issued. The board said the change is intended to curb what officials described as developer misuse of county-installed culverts and to reduce costs to taxpayers.

The vote came after a county staff member described recent installations that the board said were excessive. \"We need to look at it,\" the staff member said, and proposed that the county \"limit the number of driveway pipes to 1 per building permit per property owner.\" Commissioner Dorsey introduced the amendment and said he wanted it in effect quickly: \"I'm gonna put that in the form of a motion that we amend the policy ... Effective today or going forward tomorrow.\"

Why it matters: county staff said developers have received multiple county‑installed culverts for new lots, and commissioners said the practice shifts installation costs and ongoing maintenance risks onto taxpayers. Commissioners cited concerns about the county subsidizing installations for contractors who later sell lots to individual owners.

What the board changed: the amendment ties one county‑installed driveway culvert to a building permit/address per property owner. The motion was moved by Commissioner Dorsey, seconded by Commissioner Brown, and passed unanimously. Board members clarified that the driveway pipe is associated with the address and the building permit; if a developer sells lots to individuals, those lot owners would receive the county‑installed pipe when they obtain their building permit.

Discussion and clarifications: during debate staff estimated a county cost of roughly $600 per installation in some cases, with pipe material around $400 and additional expenses for bedding and gravel. Commissioners discussed options for recouping costs, including charging for additional pipes or requiring developers to contract for extra installations. One commissioner asked the county administrator to study possible fee or cost‑recovery measures going forward.

Distinguishing discussion from formal action: the board's formal action was the policy amendment limiting county‑installed driveway pipes to one per property owner tied to a building permit; commissioners also discussed but did not adopt a specific new fee schedule or cost‑recovery formula at the meeting.

Implementation: the motion specified the change take effect immediately (the board recorded the effective date as the day following the meeting). Staff and commissioners asked the county administrator to review implementation details and options to ensure consistent application of the revised policy.

Background: commissioners said the county previously installed culverts at no charge but changed practices after repeated drainage problems and improper installations by third parties. The amendment is intended to standardize the county's approach and limit taxpayer exposure to contractor and developer practices.","The Hart County Board of Commissioners voted 5‑0 June 24 to amend the county driveway culvert policy, restricting county‑installed driveway pipes to one per property owner tied to a building permit, effective the following day.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Resident urges county action on Confederate monument; commissioners say monument is not county property

Hart County limits county‑installed driveway culverts to one per property owner