[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6521809,"mediaKeyId","5082476-d5aff96aa973803d710877622a91471a","parentId",5082476,"title","At-a-glance: commission approves routine fiscal items, bridge naming and debt write-offs; grant and budget cleanups pass","audioSeconds",1336,"startMs",4630000,"endMs",5966000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5082476-d5aff96aa973803d710877622a91471a&start=4630&end=5966","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5082476-d5aff96aa973803d710877622a91471a/thumbnail_4630000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6521809/Giles-County/Tennessee/At-a-glance-commission-approves-routine-fiscal-items-bridge-naming-and-debt-write-offs-grant-and-budget-cleanups-pass","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6521809-87808a3b48fe30b5b7981afdee423d62/orig.mp4?Expires=1773750972&Signature=VJXiIq9hsWB-DLlSCIrr-V7K7HsQuNtCVG1ntPPcXankM1nY0wbhzFb3Rfd7Wcq4QqpRu56-oThGkyUpzJDIibQ8-E32ppCzO7hWUUGN58XdC-TwCJHUzi0YaxScNJPYsxU9YdOpIQEd14q6iIw7y7rGlmo~uozEahBI10LPO3c6KptNZ7pqEwr4JQLMc7vn~HNKUUJQ-ad~q0iE4pVzSWK2HOpcgqWLvhHRDL137rpJEtvpTc5Pr~wUH8Jf9qNG1GTLZ0JY9m1I6gYvv3J7SFEgXCBGMrNDJqJRriLNT2CQlQIX~0Tg6VdGD5QU9a0Cfw1vYcya6ngRbWJ88zQujA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Giles County","date","2025-06-26T21:29:48Z","article","Alongside the high-profile budget discussion, the Giles County Commission took several formal votes on routine financial items, contracts and resolutions.

Key items approved at the meeting:
- A grant contract to recover COVID-related expenditures (PPE and related supplies) was approved; the motion passed by voice vote and was recorded as carried.
- Several year-end or cleanup budget amendments were approved for county general fund, highway and school budgets. County staff said most adjustments were routine; one county amendment increased an autopsy budget by $25,000 to cover current shortfalls.
- The school system received authority to place an order for science textbooks ahead of the school year; that item used a small amount of fund balance to secure lead time for orders.
- A resolution to write off uncollectible hospital patient accounts for a fiscal-year period—totaling $421,471.36—was approved. County financial staff said annual write-offs are routine after collection attempts and that litigation is not the pursued option.
- A resolution to name the bridge on Hinton Ridge Road over Hinton Ridge Creek for James Robert Red (resolution 2025-27) passed by voice vote, recorded as 20 ayes and 1 no.

Votes on these items were largely routine and carried by voice vote or simple majority; specific tallies were recorded for some items (bridge naming and the write-off were recorded). The commission also approved financial reports and updated its financial management policies and procedures to accommodate software timing.

These routine approvals clear administrative housekeeping ahead of the commission’s continued budget deliberations.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Giles County Commission - June 26, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The commission approved several routine financial actions, a $421,471.36 hospital-patient account write-off, a resolution to name a bridge, grant closeouts and budget cleanup amendments while sending the main FY25–26 budget resolutions back to committee.","taxTitle","Giles County, Tennessee","taxId",59538,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6521813,"EDC reports new inquiries, site activity and a $97,000 recreational master-plan grant",174,2044000,2218000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5082476-d5aff96aa973803d710877622a91471a&start=2044&end=2218","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5082476-d5aff96aa973803d710877622a91471a/thumbnail_2044000.jpg","/articles/6521813/Giles-County/Tennessee/EDC-reports-new-inquiries-site-activity-and-a-97000-recreational-master-plan-grant","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6521813-7aa51cbfb7a42a2285eba3060589724b/orig.mp4?Expires=1773750972&Signature=SwpB~Zjc3UyLcQGvVb7g4KHUKRe8lcEj5xRNQpJ9SXwAMU2wXGSLVHJi0q9eO7KfOUHw1sotGHU5t8xrUZghXgDGh-~-V9YaTL2bPb0Uajhm5TLRE3dzVij4BbH-9dRsOlPr5wM2PkK9sxF2esDzUBAy~PlfVzGBtT8YGAorBPXEq44qMLZiaotUapRtIHSjWc3Dn7NTkaigs6N7qNmOMRW-HakZzuRZStdplaxD5dHLW2e2U4Y8m2PPKKQuHBGgkSi4xZnqL9FOBxxSv838hkk2sF5fnPvEc1SOv8cNIn3XxoDYLbQPRjxwDfqkvVdrE3hpR6Eps3Fk9N3evcCQHQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Giles County Economic Development Commission reported several new business inquiries, site activity and planning steps for county assets.

At the meeting an EDC representative said the county unemployment rate fell from 3.9% to 3.5% in April and the labor force remained near 13,000. The office received six state Requests for Information (RFIs) since the last report; four requests sought large acreage that the county does not currently own, while two sought an existing building.

The EDC said it submitted the Evelyn Building (a roughly 70,000-square-foot structure near Bennett Drive and Industrial Boulevard) in response to an RFI for a manufacturer seeking 30,000–50,000 square feet; that project showed a potential $22 million capital investment and roughly 100 jobs if located here. Another prospect, referred to as Project Lift, sought up to 800,000 square feet or a greenfield site of about 30–40 acres; the EDC offered Lot 15 (an 82-acre parcel) and said it could subdivide that lot to meet the prospect’s needs.

Site work on the Amos Hamlet project has started; officials expect completion in late July or early August depending on weather. The EDC also described a recertification effort under Tennessee’s ‘‘three-star’’ community program; that review led to three priority assets, the first of which is a countywide outdoor recreation master plan. The EDC said it had applied for a $97,000 grant to fund that master plan; the grant requires no local match.

The EDC update noted ongoing attention to the Interstate 65 corridor, particularly Exit 14, and said ownership and potential auction proceedings at property there remain uncertain while heirs and estate steps are completed. The EDC said leaders plan an inventory of any buyers and will evaluate development options that could maximize sales tax revenue.

On a separate economic note, the EDC addressed a filing of bankruptcy by Morelli (a local company). The EDC representative said the company had filed for restructuring that could allow continued operations; local leaders reported Morelli has picked up new business, is recruiting, and has had a capital infusion the EDC estimated around $1.1 million to support operations.

The EDC representative invited commissioners and residents to request more detailed information via email or phone.

Note: information on potential projects is preliminary and based on RFIs and developer interest; no contracts or incentives were approved at the meeting.","Giles County Economic Development staff said unemployment fell in April, multiple state requests for information have arrived, the Evelyn Building is being marketed for a potential $22 million project, Lot 15 was offered for a large distribution/manufacturing prospect, and a $97,000 grant was applied for a countywide outdoor master plan.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6521817,"Commission debates meeting-time change; amendment to set 5 p.m. year-round fails 12–9",589,3593000,4182000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5082476-d5aff96aa973803d710877622a91471a&start=3593&end=4182","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5082476-d5aff96aa973803d710877622a91471a/thumbnail_3593000.jpg","/articles/6521817/Giles-County/Tennessee/Commission-debates-meeting-time-change-amendment-to-set-5-pm-year-round-fails-129","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6521817-2a3acf5eadb3e6d2f2881722d53b3299/orig.mp4?Expires=1773750972&Signature=DzEwoKjVBfqmReItJQGBuGSF1jxL3vIoVBgSHF2oVBO2BR1aQ0UC3gSOHCbHVTMM-4gRWL5TxR9tOV~5AD1jDp~zX6ise46MRIXFRPCtd4r3BJfhvgiapWqHmVNiQTAbro3ELSYHWH1DITdPWAMeACX0H4T5toubFDvdTTGnXAQD-syQKFMwJtMrJ4iEoR31n2SKoybdot0r90-unpO8ZD4Nsi~TdmH80XD0cpxfF2xfYcQoSxk92eL5~tbb10jQSLnIA663avf~16YvSxzaOwVfhXerj1tKKwM8hVuhCrKs6HwmLXmRzeq64KWpvGxhAU0KL8qlAaxqif2DiLiuvw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Giles County commissioners considered a rule change to set all full-commission meetings to a single year-round start time. The commission debated competing proposals to make meetings 9 a.m. year-round, 5 p.m. year-round, or keep the current seasonal split.

Commissioner Hopkins moved to change full-commission meetings to 5 p.m. year-round; the amendment was seconded. After extended discussion that cited attendance for working residents, committee alignment and access for employees, the amendment failed on a recorded vote of 12–9. The clerk noted a two-thirds threshold would be required for a permanent rule change of that kind.

Commissioners said the split schedule had been adopted originally to balance availability for people who work day shifts with those who work other schedules. Supporters of a 9 a.m. year-round schedule argued it better aligns with committee meetings (which are held at 9 a.m.) and improves staff and employee participation. Supporters of 5 p.m. said evening meetings increase public accessibility for people who work regular daytime hours.

After the votes and discussion, the commission left the existing seasonal split in place (spring/summer meetings in the evening; fall/winter meetings in the morning). No final 2/3 rule change was adopted at the meeting.

The discussion was procedural but drew sustained debate about public access, commission recruitment and staff convenience.","Commissioners debated whether to set all full-commission meetings to a single year-round time. An amendment to move meetings to 5 p.m. year-round failed 12–9; commissioners left the seasonal split (spring/summer evenings, fall/winter mornings) in place for now.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6521822,"Giles County commissioners reject proposed 28% property tax increase, send budgets back to committee",5070,639000,5709000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5082476-d5aff96aa973803d710877622a91471a&start=639&end=5709","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5082476-d5aff96aa973803d710877622a91471a/thumbnail_639000.jpg","/articles/6521822/Giles-County/Tennessee/Giles-County-commissioners-reject-proposed-28-property-tax-increase-send-budgets-back-to-committee","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6521822-33908256af7831bf009997565762d8b8/orig.mp4?Expires=1773750972&Signature=DvhtilgLWFU2J73chBlRLMWv0h4GchvvEjanudGey8pjU3h8miZW2PmOP7LEKFnSJ4l7pVpxcgRw1~3wbc4y8vxgK66UybrrpfMpKCy8Easoa4jmAvljJIvv874A64M6u9g1yf3DSrrPi1WL4DSTQOCBgNyhyH67D4D1JyJbVTPiBMRhiVlPjbfvW--ht4YicBOSFZyzMsNmc0D6O4OesuQ4h2EXEcPKNaRZ3t6LSQLzQQN3CBuhDHygWR2ltlvE143qPcmCAlhoYznDePVeQ--PWacQdF4yEupq5df9HNa6URU-ig9Qoe9boSXx~xwsGUwlj5TyDpsYN6alZF6h8g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Giles County commissioners voted 20–1 on a motion to reject and return three proposed FY2025–26 budget resolutions to the budget committee and to hold a work session July 3 to continue deliberations.

The vote came after more than an hour of discussion among commissioners and a series of public comments criticizing a proposed 28% property tax increase. Commissioner Hrabowski moved to reject resolutions 28, 29 and 30 and send them back to the budget committee; the motion passed 20–1.

The public comment period had several speakers who said the proposed increase was too large and asked for additional transparency and time for review. Gabby Roberts urged commissioners to vote no and to “do a deep dive into alternative revenue sourcing.” Leah Haley asked for more transparency on line items and recommended an informal public forum before the committee reconvenes. Thomas King told commissioners they had not done sufficient one-on-one review of departmental budgets.

Commissioners who opposed the proposed increase raised concerns about the immediate burden on taxpayers and discussed alternatives including targeted departmental cuts, delaying capital projects, and combining a smaller property tax increase with a vehicle (“wheel”) tax referendum. Commissioner Madore said 28% “is too much of a burden to bear, especially all at once,” and warned cuts could mean fewer roads paved or losing emergency medical services staff. Several commissioners emphasized preserving pay increases for frontline EMS personnel and not cutting school renovation funding that the school board planned to finance from an over-collection mechanism.

County officials warned of administrative consequences if a budget is not adopted by July 1. The county finance director and county attorney explained that operating on a continuing resolution would freeze raises and some hires, require retroactive pay adjustments when a final budget is adopted, and could conflict with timing in school contracts and hiring. Officials said those constraints could complicate summer hiring for schools and the county and increase administrative workload.

Commissioners directed the budget committee and staff to continue work. The motion to send the budgets back resets the schedule: the commission will hold a July 3 work session and, if needed, follow-up meetings July 7–8, with any required public hearing and a later full-commission vote to adopt a final budget.

Votes at the meeting also included other routine budget amendments and approvals (separate actions summarized in the meeting’s votes roundup). The decision to send the budget back to committee does not itself adopt or enact any tax change.

The public can expect the budget committee work session July 3 and additional public hearings and meetings before any final tax rate or budget is adopted.","After hours of debate and public comment, the Giles County Commission voted 20–1 to reject three FY25–26 budget resolutions and send them back to the budget committee for further work and a July 3 work session.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

At-a-glance: commission approves routine fiscal items, bridge naming and debt write-offs; grant and budget cleanups pass

EDC reports new inquiries, site activity and a $97,000 recreational master-plan grant

Commission debates meeting-time change; amendment to set 5 p.m. year-round fails 12–9

Giles County commissioners reject proposed 28% property tax increase, send budgets back to committee