[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},"mediaId",6188705,"mediaKeyId","5062062-5cf1de346c2279c73fa3b2be4e339d48","parentId",5062062,"title","Judge denies motion to suppress; defendant found guilty after bench trial in search that produced meth","audioSeconds",763,"startMs",2192000,"endMs",2955000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5062062-5cf1de346c2279c73fa3b2be4e339d48&start=2192&end=2955","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5062062-5cf1de346c2279c73fa3b2be4e339d48/thumbnail_2192000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6188705/Texas/Judge-denies-motion-to-suppress-defendant-found-guilty-after-bench-trial-in-search-that-produced-meth","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6188705-ecd1e960d111b35837e3444ac991c99e/orig.mp4?Expires=1771139311&Signature=oVfaqwY~TywQfnpLcOl0Ite3wVkifGw18BIUoJDwRM75oLT1C-uzHiOjpK96WnG8nrVnGaJQrdMO2rEAr65UAp-iKW-rKbjbhc2PiObz6xO04M0nOXdMKOqrgDO7RjC75fOxHVhuOdW5gB5BVH0RE4i6wsOqu2tyB46QSUMtOB~kv~u9puDNQD4XVLeolWWA5hEqASQQlTMpPd2rtcnLOlmbIbUIOR8oQUqWTrKfXidAaBfUGEL3YtPORyCRI-fIv8yE3BQSwkuvvdvbVES6E2ptmMuqxRYUSx681zNxQ3XuwS3Poz4oLzXMf~s5w6OnjWIVItQmzruac0G7dxZ~aQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-06-24T17:40:27Z","article","Judge Stephanie Boyd denied a defense motion to suppress evidence gathered after a traffic stop and found Carlos Vasquez Saldana guilty following a bench trial in Bexar County. The court then imposed a two-year state-jail sentence suspended and placed Saldana on community supervision for two years with multiple conditions.

The court’s ruling resolved a central dispute at trial over whether Saldana’s verbal consent to a vehicle search was voluntary while he was handcuffed. Defense counsel argued consent was involuntary because Saldana was restrained, not told why he was detained and had not been advised of his rights in Spanish. Prosecutors and the arresting officers testified that a Spanish‑speaking officer arrived within minutes and obtained a verbal consent, and that other facts supported the officer’s reasonable decision to detain Saldana for officer safety.

Boyd summarized the evidentiary record and told the parties she had reviewed the video of the stop. She said the Spanish‑speaking officer arrived promptly and that the record did not show an “unreasonable amount of time” passed before the translation and the consent. The court concluded the totality of circumstances did not render the consent involuntary and therefore denied the suppression motion.

Prosecutors described the sequence at trial: an officer pulled the vehicle over for expired registration, observed what the officer characterized as furtive movements, placed Saldana in handcuffs for officer safety, and then requested a Spanish‑speaking officer. Officer testimony and the stipulated evidence showed the Spanish‑speaking officer asked, in Spanish, whether the officers could search the vehicle and that Saldana answered yes; the state introduced evidence from a sunglasses case that later tested positive for methamphetamine (0.253 grams was reported by the forensic witness).

Defense counsel argued the handcuffed condition and lack of explanation to Saldana created a custodial atmosphere requiring Miranda warnings before questioning and that a reasonable person in handcuffs would not have felt free to refuse. The defense asked the court to suppress the search on voluntariness grounds.

After hearing argument, Boyd denied the motion to suppress. The court then received stipulated exhibits and testimony and found the state had established the elements of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt. The court entered a guilty finding.

At sentencing the state asked the court for community supervision where applicable under the cited statute; the court sentenced Saldana to two years in the state jail facility, suspended the sentence, and placed him on two years’ supervised probation. Conditions included regular reporting (Zoom or in person), random drug testing, proof of employment within 30 days, restrictions on certain kinds of employment (no home‑health care or work with minors), monthly field visits for three months, in‑custody TAP evaluation and compliance with recommendations, and a prohibition on legal re‑entry to the United States while on probation. The record reflects the court directed the clerk to prepare a trial‑court certification of the defendant’s appellate rights.

The court’s transcript shows the state relied on officer testimony and a forensic lab result to connect the seized substance to the vehicle and evidence seized from the defendant; defense raised voluntariness and language/notice issues but did not prevail on the suppression motion. The judge’s written findings and the sentencing order were entered on the record following the bench trial.

Asked about post‑trial appellate rights on the record, the court confirmed Saldana had a right to appeal from a bench trial and that defense counsel had used an interpreter during advisals where necessary.

This case record documents the court’s weighing of the short interval before a Spanish‑speaking officer arrived, the defendant’s restrained state, and the officers’ safety concerns when applying voluntariness law to a consent given while handcuffed.

Ending: The court entered judgment and imposed probationary conditions as stated; the transcript shows counsel and the court completed the required written advisals and certifications on the record.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","TUE., JUNE 24, 2025/JUDGE STEPHANIE BOYD/187TH DISTRICT COURT/MORNING DOCKET","oneSentenceSummary","Judge Stephanie Boyd denied a defense motion to suppress evidence and found Carlos Vasquez Saldana guilty after a bench trial in Bexar County, ruling that verbal consent to search given in Spanish while the defendant was handcuffed was voluntary.","taxTitle","Judge Stephanie Boyd 187th District, District Court Judges, Judicial, Texas","taxId",66298,"location","Texas","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6188695,"Vanessa Rubio pleads true to probation violations; court sets July 8 reset for medical records after victim/defense discussion",455,5688000,6143000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5062062-5cf1de346c2279c73fa3b2be4e339d48&start=5688&end=6143","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5062062-5cf1de346c2279c73fa3b2be4e339d48/thumbnail_5688000.jpg","/articles/6188695/Texas/Vanessa-Rubio-pleads-true-to-probation-violations-court-sets-July-8-reset-for-medical-records-after-victimdefense-discussion","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6188695-7336d855148b1122426c3a557bf918af/orig.mp4?Expires=1771139311&Signature=YeXwJhqmpx54muUEkKxqspBl7HM6p~nfXnnR9VCLIwSha5fcQD5LnLmLUO0wqQ-VXnauhfZrqmnsovmHMoFzyzE8buyaN~NBZSjVRKmCug2P~JeOdZ0-xAimAQ0iScIpLHrwoS40IE2U88oq~jemuqX-0sqrZShnxQ9BOqXywUPt2KB2VB8b6QMklIp~yfJKiUXIc3pz2LFswhEa50lh7W4PONf5-nlRegflXC5IkJZxXnNTf32AJy42QfxQnIIcqOsydI7~wj0XnwKwSValozTHI1mHuCj4z11Yu1iBXJTu5Ff8MlyOSWxjaeInRMhNcFhKI1OX2EGRHMMdW0tP~g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Vanessa Fay Rubio appeared in the 187th District Court and pleaded true to two alleged violations of her community‑supervision reporting conditions. The court found the violations true on the record and heard competing recommendations: the state asked for revocation and a two‑year state‑jail sentence; defense counsel asked for continued probation and mitigation based on medical treatment and reported vision loss.

Prosecutors told the court the motion to revoke alleged repeated failures to report to probation across months in 2024 and early 2025. Rubio acknowledged the periods of nonreporting on the record. Defense counsel said probation should consider medical records showing the defendant had been seeking care for a serious eye issue and that the defendant’s failure to report stemmed in part from treatment and hospital encounters.

The court asked whether the jail and health providers had records available; defense said Rubio would sign HIPAA releases and attempt to obtain the records quickly. The state said it would seek revocation and a two‑year sentence if the medical records did not explain the reporting failures. The judge set the matter for a reset to July 8 to allow defense counsel time to obtain medical documentation and for the parties to confer. The court discussed options for testimony by nursing staff via Zoom if the records required verification.

The court recorded that the defendant pleaded true to the violations and that, absent sufficient mitigating evidence, the state would pursue revocation. The judge instructed defense counsel on practical steps—signing releases and contacting the jail nurse to expedite records—and said the court would consider material provided at the July 8 setting.

Ending: The court continued the revocation issue to July 8 for review of medical records and potential victim‑service or probation responses; the transcript indicates the court will consider mitigation documentation and hear additional argument then.","Vanessa Fay Rubio pleaded true to alleged probation reporting violations spanning 2024–2025. The state moved to revoke supervision and asked for a two‑year state‑jail sentence; defense said Rubio had recent medical issues and sought time to obtain records. The judge set a July 8 reset for probation office records and medical documentation.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6188700,"Defendant Amanda Marie Hernandez accepts plea; court defers finding of guilt and imposes probationary conditions",738,8248000,8986000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5062062-5cf1de346c2279c73fa3b2be4e339d48&start=8248&end=8986","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5062062-5cf1de346c2279c73fa3b2be4e339d48/thumbnail_8248000.jpg","/articles/6188700/Texas/Defendant-Amanda-Marie-Hernandez-accepts-plea-court-defers-finding-of-guilt-and-imposes-probationary-conditions","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6188700-308bb33613a534513071ff417980dde2/orig.mp4?Expires=1771139311&Signature=j9xFBqIVXoWkqL-rr~voEyN06P3jdhwtejOONs5WzqWxaXUBiwhrvuHlTafSsdYAo7te2MMvxnfGeEZyACPvNVJSQ7gj-W3xetWH6hFKk82rtWsadKTHSEHxYkCwOOaMyFtPE63M6kIgo6pAc-l7ZlnJLnTTkC4~mGeXkXHxyRzUbVnSKbxcYYpUHFoq68sfiimRJ209BtaPr3Cb3NY7Pu9TnXlAP7fNCEteVaG-AdCVPK0MvRX2rAutlJlNA0mXNaDAAskwDSRG4Xec04toYQoCpkSbuLU7uzTKV7~VKsbX89YUH4yAt8nhgGWYPt0y2IB68pjvHLuccoTPNJqqmg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Amanda Marie Hernandez pleaded to two indicted felony cases in the 187th District Court and the court accepted plea agreements that deferred adjudication and set probationary requirements.

Hernandez waived a jury and, after the state offered stipulations and documentary exhibits, Judge Stephanie Boyd found the evidence sufficient and deferred a finding of guilt in one case. For cause number 2025CR000174 the court imposed a five‑year deferred‑adjudication term; that judgment runs concurrent with cause number 2025CR007073. The court placed a $1,500 fine on the second cause and probated that fine.

The state’s written plea agreement and the court’s oral pronouncements recorded multiple probationary conditions: restitution (amounts to be determined) to named victims, 100 hours of community‑service restitution, regular reporting (Zoom or in person), random UAs, proof of employment within 45 days of release, restrictions against employment as a home‑health provider or work with minors, a prohibition on residing with minors or elderly persons, monthly field visits until further notice, TAP evaluation in custody with follow recommendations, referral to felony drug court and Esperanza program while in custody, and 60 sober‑support meetings within 60 days.

The court also entered an affirmative finding of family violence as to cause number 2025CR007073; Boyd warned that the finding bars the defendant from owning or possessing weapons and may affect custodial rights. The court advised Hernandez of her limited appeal rights under the plea and required the parties to resolve restitution amounts with probation; defense counsel noted an intent to seek a restitution hearing if probation’s calculation is disputed.

A victim present in court gave a Spanish‑language impact statement; the court allowed the statement and confirmed a Spanish interpreter had been used earlier for advisals where appropriate.

Boyd confirmed that the plea agreements would stand as announced on the record and that the clerk should enter the deferred‑adjudication orders and other sentencing paperwork. The court also noted the pleas considered a 2024 case in sentencing. Counsel completed required advisals and the court accepted the plea and deferred adjudication as set out on the record.

Ending: Orders reflecting the terms announced on the record were directed to be prepared and filed. The transcript shows the court completed trial‑court certification of appeal rights and advisals with counsel and the defendant present.","Amanda Marie Hernandez entered plea agreements in two felony cases before the 187th District Court. The court deferred findings of guilt, placed her on deferred adjudication with concurrent terms and conditions including restitution, no‑contact orders and referrals to drug‑court programs, and imposed a $1,500 probated fine in one case.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Judge denies motion to suppress; defendant found guilty after bench trial in search that produced meth

Vanessa Rubio pleads true to probation violations; court sets July 8 reset for medical records after victim/defense discussion

Defendant Amanda Marie Hernandez accepts plea; court defers finding of guilt and imposes probationary conditions