Flagstaff residents voice opposition to proposed mini storage rezoning plan

In a recent Planning and Zoning Study Session and Public Hearing held by Coconino County on June 25, 2025, community members voiced strong concerns regarding a proposed zoning change that could allow for the construction of a mini storage facility adjacent to an established family-owned mini storage business. This proposal has sparked significant debate among local residents, particularly those living near the site.

During the meeting, several residents highlighted the potential negative impact of adding another mini storage facility in an area already saturated with similar businesses. One resident, who has operated a mini storage for over 30 years, expressed skepticism about the new proposal, questioning the current ownership's intentions and ability to ensure the highest and best use of the property. Concerns were raised about the compatibility of the proposed zoning change with the surrounding neighborhood, which has historically maintained a low-impact commercial character.

Another resident, Tim Delagalski, who owns property directly south of the proposed site, emphasized that the community had not shown support for the zoning change. He referenced the county's own area plan, which states that such changes should not be supported without resident backing. Delagalski argued that the application should be denied based on the lack of community support and suggested that a rezone to residential would be more appropriate and welcomed by neighbors.

The discussions also touched on the historical context of the area, with residents clarifying details about property access and the timeline of existing structures. The meeting concluded with a call for further consideration of the community's input before any zoning decisions are made.

As Coconino County moves forward, the voices of local residents will play a crucial role in shaping the future of this area, highlighting the importance of community engagement in planning and zoning processes. The next steps will involve further review of the proposal and continued dialogue with residents to address their concerns.