County Emergency Services raises concerns over battery energy storage facility fire safety

The recent monthly meeting of the Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC) on June 25, 2025, highlighted significant concerns regarding emergency response and safety measures related to a proposed battery energy storage system (BESS) project in Washington. Community members expressed apprehension about the county's preparedness to handle potential emergencies, particularly in the event of a battery fire.

One of the primary concerns raised was the county's lack of resources for firefighting and emergency response. Local emergency services officials indicated that they currently do not have the manpower, funding, or equipment necessary to effectively combat a battery fire. This has led to fears that, should an incident occur, the county would struggle to manage the situation adequately.

In response to these concerns, the applicant has committed to developing a comprehensive fire response plan and emergency management plan in collaboration with local fire protection agencies. This plan will include training for staff on how to respond to battery fires, which are unique due to the chemical nature of the materials involved. The applicant is also required to provide a 10,000-gallon cistern for smoke containment, which can help mitigate the spread of smoke during a fire.

Additionally, the council discussed the importance of effective communication during emergencies. There are plans to ensure that notification procedures are included in the emergency management plan, allowing for timely alerts to residents who may be affected by a fire.

Another topic of discussion was the environmental safety of the battery technology being used. While the current proposal involves lithium-ion batteries, concerns were raised about the potential risks associated with thermal runaway—a situation where a battery overheats and can catch fire. Some council members suggested exploring alternative battery technologies that may offer greater safety.

The meeting also touched on visual impacts and light pollution, particularly in areas striving for dark sky status. Council members emphasized the need for low-intensity, downward-facing lighting to minimize disruption to the night sky.

As the council moves forward, these discussions will play a crucial role in shaping the safety protocols and environmental considerations of the proposed project. The next steps will involve further consultations and the development of detailed plans to address the community's concerns, ensuring that public safety remains a top priority as the project progresses.