County officials debate solar project location amid community opposition

The Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council convened on June 25, 2025, to discuss significant developments regarding solar energy projects within the county's energy overlay zone. The meeting highlighted the complexities surrounding local government support for energy initiatives and the community's opposition to specific projects.

One of the primary topics addressed was the county's endorsement of energy projects in designated overlay zones. A council member sought clarification on the apparent contradiction between local government support for energy development and the opposition from residents regarding a large solar project. The discussion revealed that while the energy overlay zone was originally established to promote wind energy, the scale of proposed solar projects—specifically one covering 1,600 acres—has raised concerns among residents.

A key speaker noted that the chosen site for the solar project is in close proximity to the Big Eddy substation, which makes it strategically beneficial. However, the visibility of the site has become a contentious issue. The speaker emphasized that the solar installation would be highly visible from a significant distance, impacting the aesthetic landscape and potentially the quality of life for nearby residents.

The council also discussed the county's current stance on solar energy. Although there is a large solar project in the sparsely populated eastern part of the county, the Goldendale Valley has been deemed less suitable for solar development due to its proximity to populated areas. The speaker expressed frustration over the county's blanket ban on solar projects in the valley, attributing this reaction to the controversial Carriger project, which has sparked significant local opposition.

Efforts are underway to revise the county's solar ordinance, but the speaker expressed skepticism about the likelihood of changing the current restrictions. They advocated for a more nuanced approach that would allow solar development in less populated areas of the valley, suggesting that certain locations could coexist with agricultural activities.

In conclusion, the meeting underscored the ongoing tensions between energy development and community concerns in the county. As discussions continue, the council aims to navigate these challenges while considering both the potential benefits of solar energy and the need to address local residents' apprehensions. Further updates on the solar ordinance and community engagement efforts are anticipated in future meetings.