Utah reviews adoption laws amid concerns over paternal rights and ethical practices

In a recent meeting of the Judiciary Interim Committee on June 18, 2025, significant concerns were raised regarding Utah's adoption laws and their impact on biological fathers and adoptive families. The discussions highlighted the complexities and challenges within the state's legal framework, particularly for fathers seeking to establish paternity and for families navigating the adoption process.

One of the primary issues addressed was the legal barriers faced by biological fathers, especially those from out of state. A poignant example was shared about a father who learned that his girlfriend could place their unborn child for adoption without informing him, leaving him with no legal recourse. This situation underscores a troubling gap in Utah's adoption laws, which can leave responsible fathers without the ability to assert their rights due to the state's stringent requirements for establishing paternity. Currently, fathers must initiate a paternity action in court and register on a state-maintained registry, a process that can be both costly and complicated.

The committee also examined the emotional and financial toll on adoptive families. Utah's expedited adoption process, while attracting families from across the nation, often comes with exorbitant costs. One family reported spending approximately $100,000 on their adoption, which later hindered their ability to adopt a sibling for their child. This financial strain can lead to heartbreaking separations of siblings, raising concerns about the long-term emotional consequences for the children involved.

The discussions prompted committee members to question why Utah's adoption practices differ from those in other states, suggesting a need for legislative reforms to ensure a more ethical and transparent adoption process. The committee acknowledged that while reforms are necessary, they must also protect the interests of all parties involved, including birth parents, adoptive families, and the children themselves.

In conclusion, the Judiciary Interim Committee's meeting shed light on the urgent need for reform in Utah's adoption laws. By addressing the barriers faced by biological fathers and the financial burdens on adoptive families, Utah has the potential to lead the nation in creating a more compassionate and responsible adoption system. The committee's commitment to exploring these issues indicates a proactive approach to improving the legal landscape for all involved in the adoption process.