Residents question RWA's role in Aquarian Water Authority acquisition plan

In a recent public comment hearing held by the Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA), significant concerns were raised regarding the proposed change of control of Aquarion Water Company. The discussions highlighted the implications of this transition for local communities, particularly in relation to property taxes, service efficiency, and governance.

One of the primary issues discussed was the financial impact on cities and towns served by Aquarion. Local officials expressed worries about potential increases in property taxes and additional charges, such as hydrant fees. Over the past three years, the Regional Water Authority (RWA) has seen a slight decrease in pilot payments, while the assets subject to assessment have increased. This raises questions about the financial burden on residents if the proposed changes go through.

A key point of contention was the operational efficiency of Aquarion compared to the RWA. It was noted that Aquarion operates with 49% greater efficiency in terms of employee count relative to the number of customers served. Additionally, the RWA has reported twice as many recordable accidents, raising concerns about health and safety standards under their management.

The governance structure of the proposed new entity, the Aquarion Water Authority, was also scrutinized. Critics pointed out that the RWA would appoint six out of eleven members on the governing board, despite Aquarion being significantly larger in terms of operations. This arrangement has led to accusations that the RWA is attempting to exert control over Aquarion, undermining the intent of the proposed change.

In contrast, Garrett Sheehan, President and CEO of the Greater New Haven Chamber of Commerce, offered a different perspective. He praised the RWA as a strong community partner, emphasizing their engagement in economic development and positive interactions with local businesses. Sheehan acknowledged the concerns raised but highlighted the RWA's commitment to the community as a significant factor in their operations.

As the hearing progressed, it became clear that the future of Aquarion Water Company and its governance remains a contentious issue. The discussions underscored the need for transparency and clarity regarding the intentions of the RWA and the implications for local residents. The outcome of this hearing could have lasting effects on water management and community relations in Connecticut, making it a critical topic for ongoing public discourse.