[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6553241,"mediaKeyId","5073391-1c7efdc63bbe9484c545db03c4e2abf0","parentId",5073391,"title","CB2 clears dozens of permits and resolutions: landmarks denies large mural at 344 Bowery; street‑activity, SLA and traffic items advance","audioSeconds",1225,"startMs",7225000,"endMs",8450000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5073391-1c7efdc63bbe9484c545db03c4e2abf0&start=7225&end=8450","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5073391-1c7efdc63bbe9484c545db03c4e2abf0/thumbnail_7225000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6553241/Manhattan-City/New-York-County/New-York/CB2-clears-dozens-of-permits-and-resolutions-landmarks-denies-large-mural-at-344-Bowery-streetactivity-SLA-and-traffic-items-advance","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6553241-b48e8fb47c312899b5d864fcbaa228c8/orig.mp4?Expires=1775075406&Signature=g04xkNrQ5HScOkMEpCySf70B6rrF9UTPl-bV3DEqtUP8MNfb033q904h-TTvDvtrX~5JfUgJwvZE4XmSj2-5NNyXtEOVWf5SEN7XJMCTzYYTClsuPrSgwGIWrNxKBUTOz1~sOiHDpCyG9xRph0FIaOHpVN10nHNOggCaPHHeakppmfRmw4EVPFZvgoZAA4DquwI-4ET6okzXpKnAoUK1h7LJIH-obbjndyumY4HcwjXhdMfBo9dQCYzcfaijvGRXGJZBa3aeAHw4eof5XAtVoCYsj2R7wNcL-O76rGMGzrSCYz~NoqwFL3vIfVtxqIF~g1ZjHkSDrBeJJklcMqDJQw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Manhattan, NY","date","2025-06-25T21:53:32Z","article","Manhattan Community Board 2 on June 18 moved a large package of committee recommendations, approving dozens of resolutions from Landmarks, Street Activities & Resiliency, Traffic & Transportation, and the State Liquor Authority (SLA) reviews.

Votes at a glance
- Landmarks & Public Aesthetics (items 1'7): The board adopted the committee's recommendations. Notably, the board recommended denial of a large photorealistic mural of Jean‑Michel Basquiat at 344 Bowery, citing scale, context and questions about whether the work functions as advertising. One panel member abstained on the mural item.
- Street Activities & Resiliency (items 1'2 plus 1 FYI renewal): The committee reviewed 21 permit applications and one FYI renewal. Most events and pop‑ups were approved with conditions; several no‑shows or applications that violated embargo rules were denied. Committee chairs flagged several unnamed brand pop‑ups and requested better disclosure from production companies; one board member voted no on item 20 (unnamed multi‑day brand activation) and another member abstained. Multiple recusals were recorded where members reported potential conflicts.
- Traffic & Transportation (2 items): The board unanimously approved two items after an amendment. The amended resolution urges MTA/New York City Transit to make Access‑a‑Ride pilot data public and to upgrade technology and training for private carriers; the board added language asking that drivers be able to effectively communicate with riders, including provision of translation technology.
- SLA & Liquor (SLA1 and SLA2 portfolios): The board approved a large slate of liquor license and sidewalk/roadway dining applications under SLA1 and SLA2. Most actions were \"deny unless\" conditional approvals (i.e., approved if applicants accept stipulations and incorporate them into their licenses). A number of applicants received roadway seating approvals; several applications were denied because of previous infractions or embargoed blocks. There were a small number of recusals and one recorded non‑unanimous vote on a specific application.

Controversies and committee notes
- Basquiat mural (344 Bowery): Landmarks said the oversized, photorealistic depiction did not read as an appropriate historic‑district treatment and expressed concern about commercial benefit to the artist. The committee recommended denial of the mural, denial of a proposed maintenance plan that would allow deliberate fading, and asked for alternatives more sensitive to the district.
- Unnamed brand pop‑ups: Street Activities committee members and some board members objected when production companies declined to disclose a brand under NDA; the committee has urged SAPO (Street Activity Permit Office) and production companies to provide more detail so the board can assess scale and impacts. One board member cast a measured \"no\" vote on the unnamed four‑day activation.
- Outdoor dining stipulations: The committees emphasized conditional approvals, noting DOT and Dining Out NYC processing creates a backlog; several approvals were contingent on applicants accepting specific closing hours, noise and trash stipulations. Committee chairs said conditional approvals remain in effect until the license is changed by applicant request and will be reconsidered if applicants return for expanded hours.

Notable recusals and abstentions (as recorded at the meeting)
- Member recusal: Rocio Sanz recused on SLA2 item 10 (stated relationship to a tenant). Donna Raftery recused on SLA1 items 1, 18 and 20 (meatpacking BID affiliation). Erica Olsen recused on SLA1 item 8 (client relationship disclosed). One abstention was recorded on Landmarks item 1 (mural denial).

Next steps: Board staff will transmit committee recommendations and stipulated conditions to the appropriate city agencies (DOT, SAPO, TLC, SLA) and will track compliance. The Street Activities committee asked members and residents to share photos of events that skirt permits so staff can document impacts.

Ending: Committee chairs thanked staff and volunteers for processing a heavy package of applications and noted several items will return if applicants seek modified approvals.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Manhattan CB2 June 18, 2025 - Full Board Meeting","oneSentenceSummary","Manhattan Community Board 2 cleared a large slate of committee recommendations at its June 18 meeting, approving dozens of Street Activities and SLA items, and adopting Landmarks recommendations that included denial of a large mural at 344 Bowery.","taxTitle","Manhattan City, New York County, New York","taxId",3586,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6553244,"Manhattan CB2 approves resolution opposing proposed charter changes that would shorten land‑use review",2571,4215000,6786000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5073391-1c7efdc63bbe9484c545db03c4e2abf0&start=4215&end=6786","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5073391-1c7efdc63bbe9484c545db03c4e2abf0/thumbnail_4215000.jpg","/articles/6553244/Manhattan-City/New-York-County/New-York/Manhattan-CB2-approves-resolution-opposing-proposed-charter-changes-that-would-shorten-landuse-review","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6553244-adb72df3a193c395c55bc5d8b2eae8be/orig.mp4?Expires=1775075406&Signature=YGVqoUjYMDaQwZUEQwjfPv1uyMB9KDLgjvjQfLcrGsxs35PDd1nZruqbsZaam4Gc4kTC6u7GU4bN71O2hvHoiOA45NtIIXuX6tqDXtW9IrYY5nR2nAPv-rJGUTVOCIJVwY6rQoBb2RrVLLpvbnJDSUHTNUTQmSqAR8umQsIhyzkA1Xhvk7Tus4B-PmQr7oKLaA0YWGg9grStNoKXTbdUwh0c49CTpv3nkOd6URNFXaw1T5xKR7Agi9IiaKl8lcijzqe9FvbV12E52VMGpA54VHFUBf~OQUcST0G7BQa8qanvj~nO6rxGqYExXFjezutLIoFj0H1395Id6lEE25q38w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Manhattan Community Board 2 voted June 18 to approve a resolution opposing proposed city charter changes that would shorten the Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (ULURP) and alter the roles of local review bodies.

The full board adopted the land‑use resolution after extended debate. The board secretary recorded nine votes opposing the measure and three abstentions; the remaining members voted in favor and the resolution passed. The committee that drafted the text did not have quorum at its June meeting, a point noted in the discussion.

The resolution, presented by First Vice Chair Eugene Yu, lists specific objections to recommendations from the mayor's Charter Revision Commission and related proposals. It opposes reducing ULURP from 90 days to 60 days, objects to running simultaneous community board and borough president reviews, calls for clearer definitions of so‑called \"categorically beneficial\" projects, and warns against creating a mayor‑appointed three‑member panel that could override City Council decisions.

Why it matters: ULURP is the city's principal public review process for rezonings and large land‑use changes. Board members who supported the resolution said shortening review time or reallocating decision authority would reduce opportunities for local input on projects that shape neighborhoods.

Discussion highlights
- Eugene Yu (First Vice Chair, Manhattan CB2) read the committee's recommended language and emphasized the resolution's request that the Charter Revision Commission preserve the precertification phase and fund community boards to handle larger applications. He also urged post‑action analysis of major rezonings.
- Ryder Kessler (Board member) framed the broader context: \"One of the core causes of the spiraling housing crisis is a lack of production,\" he said, and argued the city needs tools to accelerate housing supply. He said he supported reforms in principle but was concerned by parts of the mayor's proposal.
- Sean Ryan (Board member) pressed for more housing and said permitting barriers have contributed to rising rents: \"It's the moral thing to do to build more housing and to build a lot of it,\" he said.
- Other speakers, including Janine Kiley, Arturo Fernandez and Shirley Secunda, debated whether the mayor's suggested changes would improve predictability or would reduce meaningful local oversight.

What the resolution says (summary)
- Opposes shortening ULURP from 90 to 60 days.
- Urges the commission to account for and preserve the precertification stage when developers consult communities before formal filings.
- Opposes concurrent community board/borough president reviews and undefined \"categorically beneficial\" shortcuts.
- Opposes creation of a three‑member, mayor‑appointed panel with power to override the elected City Council.
- Recommends additional resources for community boards to evaluate complex land‑use applications and a post‑rezoning metrics process to assess outcomes (housing units added, displacement analysis, land‑use mix, square footage).

Next steps: Board staff said they will transmit CB2's resolution to the Charter Revision Commission and plan to testify during the public comment period. The Commission's public comment window and hearings were cited during the meeting as closing in early July.

Board context: Speakers noted the district has limited large vacant sites and pointed to past local campaigns to secure more affordable units in specific projects (for example, 388 Hudson and other local rezonings) as evidence the board has pushed for housing within the constraints of existing processes.

Ending: With the resolution adopted, Manhattan CB2 will include the text in its public testimony to the mayor's Charter Revision Commission and continue to monitor hearings and ballot proposals that may follow later this year.","Manhattan Community Board 2 on June 18 approved a resolution opposing recommendations from the mayor's Charter Revision Commission that would shorten the Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (ULURP) and shift or weaken local review roles. The vote followed an extended debate about housing production, community input and the mayor's proposals.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

CB2 clears dozens of permits and resolutions: landmarks denies large mural at 344 Bowery; street‑activity, SLA and traffic items advance

Manhattan CB2 approves resolution opposing proposed charter changes that would shorten land‑use review