[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6521169,"mediaKeyId","5113876-591fe25fd389dfd17b42c88a0f99e5cd","parentId",5113876,"title","Votes at a glance: Miami‑Dade commission approves multiple first‑reading ordinances, RFPs for landfill gas and cardboard; appointments confirmed","audioSeconds",6893,"startMs",2339000,"endMs",9232000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5113876-591fe25fd389dfd17b42c88a0f99e5cd&start=2339&end=9232","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5113876-591fe25fd389dfd17b42c88a0f99e5cd/thumbnail_2339000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6521169/Miami-Dade-County/Florida/Votes-at-a-glance-MiamiDade-commission-approves-multiple-firstreading-ordinances-RFPs-for-landfill-gas-and-cardboard-appointments-confirmed","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6521169-14037e9ecbc34c05b6b8c6e96d0e0e8e/orig.mp4?Expires=1770486522&Signature=PvHS4d~k2-OtY7MrjpQS9hMOg8wU0NlFO7jisn8uY5gRlIaNM23H-RMKLlNvS03Scr5XvVST6x5vhby~-5krbWyeJeSwZXFuU5tH5Pc9kzDYlaQB0j-FwB~N0Wuxj5eHizSUSPZF95PPPHi-8mAi9DrHc6r-udmITL-Y1kvfYqO7epI7nv2QpAPauyuyZ6ToZJ2du3KBXmmG~pgl-i0WbGWvweJW3WgFNa3osIJRwwkFrA69u99tuDhSXcNi~ketgJuteIH1req3vYFq2Sd1vQhxeZkYlE5OrI0p1OpgUkve03oBmn6uBsYGRjX1IHEE5-TfstWF-GuImvZf6JvsAg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Miami-Dade County","date","2025-07-01T00:00:00Z","article","At its regular meeting the Miami‑Dade County Board of County Commissioners voted on a large set of agenda items that were largely approved on single votes, with several notable exceptions and separate votes described below.

Quick outcomes (selected)
- First‑reading ordinances establishing special taxing districts and approving related street‑lighting and multipurpose maintenance districts (items 4a through 4o series) were approved by single vote after the clerk called the roll; several of these waivered code provisions such as R13006 were referenced by staff and the items carried unanimously.
- Public hearing items (5‑series) including plats and special‑taxing‑district confirmations were approved by the board after standard public‑hearing procedures; individual roll calls are recorded in the minutes.
- Item 8p2 (commercial service airport contract) was approved by voice vote as presented.
- The board approved motions directing the mayor to advertise RFPs to pursue methane capture at county landfills and to solicit revenue contracts for cardboard waste, motions moved by Commissioner Regalado and seconded on the floor.
- Nathan Cogan was appointed director of the Department of Housing and Community Development following a mayoral nomination and public recognition.
- The board filled seats on the Greater Miami Expressway Agency, appointing Carlos Cortina and Enrique Espino.

Contested votes and follow‑ups
- Item 4j (solid‑waste assessment): after extended debate the board voted to advertise a 1% proposed assessment on TRIM/mailed notice (see dedicated article). The item was the subject of multiple motions, a suspension of rules and a final roll‑call vote that passed 8–4.
- Item 14a1/14a3 (American Dream/TIF and settlement): the commission deferred the TIF‑lifting item under a four‑day rule and asked the administration to return with settlement documents and a payment schedule for the board to consider at the next meeting.

Other approvals and actions
- Several public‑hearing plats and community development district petitions were approved (5c, 5f, 5g, 5k, 5q etc.; see clerk roll for full list).
- A package of special taxing district assessment roles and rates for the fiscal year commencing 10/01/2025 was approved for numerous street‑lighting and multipurpose maintenance districts (items 5l through 5o and related).
- The board approved procedural motions and the chair's agenda setting; it also accepted several committee/poll list changes and pulled items for separate consideration where requested by commissioners.

Meeting note: this roundup highlights passed items and the main contested items. For detailed roll‑call tallies, official ordinance/resolution texts and committee tracking, refer to the clerk's certified minutes and the county's online agenda packet for this meeting.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Miami-Dade County - Miami-Dade Board of County Commissioners - Jul 01, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Commissioners approved a large package of first‑reading ordinances and public hearing actions in a single omnibus fashion and took separate votes on contested items including the solid‑waste assessment and deferred a TIF‑related item on the American Dream site.","taxTitle","Miami-Dade County, Florida","taxId",2864,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6521173,"Commissioners defer vote on American Dream Mall TIF measure; settlement of $5 million to be returned for review",12743,1467000,14210000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5113876-591fe25fd389dfd17b42c88a0f99e5cd&start=1467&end=14210","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5113876-591fe25fd389dfd17b42c88a0f99e5cd/thumbnail_1467000.jpg","/articles/6521173/Miami-Dade-County/Florida/Commissioners-defer-vote-on-American-Dream-Mall-TIF-measure-settlement-of-5-million-to-be-returned-for-review","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6521173-0d7a49796097836330e6518df6a2863f/orig.mp4?Expires=1770486522&Signature=UiKRqTYicweyeqINdejd4od~DhRyxj6M8ZDk2HRT9zXoVbrB8yL~5gV3DT1nimKA87i-kxu2HtjrWbKFNKNnfPGKBjDANI-lNVP0XRwh3Jp6cFFuaLlppl6LFW9qcTrqSfBdntUdWEklchlgsN8OX~DM5eQA9XQZb7StwjUwozTOVKfezIiLJ8T2zMEyXiKtiG5Zdh2RdfEoMNJKuvic8mP-WAZQiBg3~N0uBc4Q1MHbUjPap6xO4Xg1EW~gJbzM-tP4VJj4rEyMYT~ZNn4OGsB~3E5chNdgD5hvQmrjnAoBJ6HGPVE4ptyVFNpnbsJHNFVRJYf5ezySU5Vi~-2-Zw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Miami‑Dade County Commission deferred a proposal tied to the so‑called American Dream Mall site and related development finance tools, and commissioners debated a separate proposed settlement of a lawsuit tied to the property.

The deferral (four‑day rule) means the board will take up the matter again at its next commission meeting; county officials said the administration will present the settlement (payment schedule for $5 million) and supporting documents when the matter returns.

Why it matters: Commissioners and multiple public speakers framed the items as two linked questions: how to unlock road and interchange improvements in northwest Miami‑Dade (potentially leveraging hundreds of millions in state transportation funding) and how to resolve lingering litigation or bond disputes tied to a long‑delayed development on county‑adjacent land. Some speakers argued lifting restrictions could help the county attract a roughly $350 million state investment in area interchanges; others warned that tax and revenue tools proposed could reduce county general‑fund receipts over the long term.

Public comment and local testimony
Public speakers urged the commission to lift a restriction and allow talks with the state. Miguel Diaz de la Portilla, who identified himself during public comment, told the commission the items \"represent a unique opportunity for Miami‑Dade County to leverage potentially ... $350,000,000 in state infrastructure in Miami‑Dade County,\" and said that using existing impact‑fee districts could \"potentially represent[] a $17,000,000,000 economic impact to the county, [and] represents $16,000,000 in tax revenue to the county the first year alone.\" Robert M. Gorlo and consultant Scott Leftwich also urged the commission to remove a bar to state cooperation so the interchanges could proceed.

Commissioner concerns and amendment
Commissioner Raquel Regalado and others raised concerns about the developer's track record and about long‑term fiscal impacts of tax increment financing (TIF) and other tools that capture future increases in property value. Regalado said she was comfortable moving the question to committee and wanted guarantees that the administration would aggressively pursue other revenue sources and hold any developer to timelines; she opposed treating one applicant differently than others.

Administration response and amendment
City and county staff said the county had worked with the commissioner and the applicant on language to narrow an earlier motion. Chief Operating Officer Miguel \u0000Morales and other staff described an amendment that removed a broad sentence about county dollars and replaced it with language limiting the carve‑out to funds generated by the project (impact fees), and to federal and state monies that might be received for the project — language the administration said still would require commission approval for any use of funds. Morales and other staff said the change was intended to ensure legally available funds tied to a future project were not precluded from being used for locally needed road improvements in northwest Miami‑Dade.

Settlement and next steps
The county attorney and administration told the board the proposed $5 million settlement tied to prior noncompliance would be brought back to the commission with a payment schedule and related documents at the next meeting. Administration officials said the settlement and the discussion of transportation funding are separable and can be considered independently, but several commissioners said they viewed the decisions as linked in practice because state and federal funding prospects can be affected by local endorsements.

Ending/what to watch
The board invoked a four‑day rule to defer the TIF/lifting request (item 14a1) and asked the administration to return with the settlement (item 14a3) and related documentation. Commissioners asked for clearer fiscal impact modeling showing how any TIF or special financing would affect the county's general fund over the long term; they also asked for evidence that state FDOT commitments (staff cited a PD&E allocation of $500,000 this year and $6 million next year for study work) could be leveraged by local approvals. The items will return to the commission; the administration said it will present a proposed settlement package and the agreed amendment language for the TIF discussion when it returns.","After lengthy public comment and debate about transportation needs in northwest Miami‑Dade, commissioners deferred (4‑day rule) action on a measure that would lift limits tied to a prior resolution and debated a separate $5 million settlement; the administration said the settlement will return for the board's consideration at a future meeting.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6521178,"Commissioners approve 1% solid‑waste assessment after lengthy debate over fees and revenue opportunities",2037,2799000,4836000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5113876-591fe25fd389dfd17b42c88a0f99e5cd&start=2799&end=4836","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5113876-591fe25fd389dfd17b42c88a0f99e5cd/thumbnail_2799000.jpg","/articles/6521178/Miami-Dade-County/Florida/Commissioners-approve-1-solidwaste-assessment-after-lengthy-debate-over-fees-and-revenue-opportunities","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6521178-61eefdffb66a7ef4b57bc33bffcada88/orig.mp4?Expires=1770486522&Signature=YDXm0w48B479A0xBgj-V9XkEsnXK24N8cmIBpe~M0~ZG5kIVqMVUuYvJ~F1WMBA~ccr-PpLs4uBKUEuPxK-bMuGP-8Z21doip7iCOg78-9YPwPZBWPKJjPkIuRuQiIfhzlXwm1zODgk5E3NBsRkjEVp37AwjiEsR6fgTnsquDQ1XhP~4~ilP-i9PbLI893TI4Ktfew4DBkeEHkrbxU3f3kwR~iyHAyqX5PkjY7sOpcRHhEo1GF8L0SAESCOmLMnenRjeewfi0wRI63WcizAtOmhFH8cqqgF~Z2gGzaRZyj4rdzqQf6ftVysiCfI2Abo9AXDO7MrKr7uU~twlamoyyQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Miami‑Dade County commissioners voted 8–4 to approve a one‑percent non‑ad valorem solid‑waste assessment for fiscal year 2025, reversing an earlier proposal for a two‑percent increase after more than three hours of discussion on department savings, potential new revenue streams and the statutory notice process.

The measure will be advertised as a proposed 1% increase on the county's TRIM notice and in mailed notices to property owners; the board retains authority at second reading to alter the rate up or down. The administration and the Solid Waste Department said the shorter increase is intended to keep collection and disposal services fiscally balanced while staff explores offsets and new revenue options.

Why it matters: The assessment funds trash collection, illegal dumping cleanup, enforcement and landfill disposal for roughly 352,000 single‑family parcels in unincorporated Miami‑Dade. Commissioners repeatedly framed the decision against a larger countywide budget shortfall and said they wanted more detailed line‑item data and faster progress on revenue ideas before agreeing to a larger increase.

The vote and the vehicle
Commissioner Kathleen Gilbert (sponsor) led the motion to advance an assessment proposal after the commission suspended rules to allow fuller discussion. County officials said a flat vote would have required the board to adopt an ordinance before the statutory September 25 deadline if the assessment is to be collected on the tax bill.

The final action adopted a 1% proposed increase for the mailed and TRIM notices; that figure was described on the dais as the highest amount the board would advertise but not a final determination. The county attorney clarified that notice must include a proposed rate when there is an increase and that mailed notice triggers the board's flexibility at public hearing to change the figure up or down.

What commissioners and staff said
\"Last year, we gave direction to the administration to bring us back the cost'the fee increase or the fee that actually represented the cost to run the system,\" Commissioner Gilbert said in the debate, describing the action as a mechanism to let the board decide a fee that covers actual operating costs. \"It's not a fee. It's an assessment. Pay the assessment.\"

Commissioner Raquel Regalado pressed administration and department leaders for a detailed accounting and more aggressive pursuit of revenue opportunities before increasing the assessment. \"There are revenue opportunities within this department we are not capturing,\" she said, and pressed for faster steps such as negotiating better contracts for recycled cardboard and accelerating methane‑capture efforts at county landfills.

Mayor Daniella Levine Cava said administration had identified about $5 million in efficiencies and described the proposed 2% figure the administration submitted earlier as reflecting a combination of inflation, collective‑bargaining cost increases and higher equipment costs: \"This increase comes to $0.14 per pickup,\" the mayor said, urging the board to keep working with the department.

Anisha Daniel, director of Solid Waste, told commissioners the department had cut overtime and other costs and had found nearly $5 million in savings in the last year. \"Had I not been able to work within the administration ... we would be coming for a 4% increase, instead of a 2% increase,\" Daniel said. She described vehicle procurement costs that rose from about $330,000 to $480,000 per vehicle and said equipment costs had jumped substantially.

Director (Coley) of Emergency Management (as cited in the meeting) warned that tapping reserves to avoid an assessment risked leaving the county exposed to storm cleanup costs that FEMA might not fully reimburse: that uncertainty contributed to the urgency to adopt a rate and then refine it via committee work.

Process, timing and next steps
- The board suspended rules to allow extended discussion and then approved a motion that set the mailed/TRIM notice at 1% (the advertised maximum). Clerk roll call recorded the motion passing 8–4.
- County attorneys explained that mailed notice requires listing a proposed rate and gives the board the authority at the public hearing to increase or decrease the published figure. The board intends to bring follow‑up items to committee as discussion items and to consider any final figure at second reading; the administration said it will work with commissioners on negotiated offsets (cardboard revenue share, methane capture) and possible operational changes that could reduce the assessment before final adoption.

Discussion points and directions from the meeting
- Commissioners asked the Solid Waste Department to provide line‑by‑line budget detail and supporting data on the areas that drove the proposed increase (fleet costs, labor/CBAs, landfill costs, overtime). Several commissioners requested rapid follow‑up briefings and committee discussion focused on revenue opportunities (cardboard, methane) and options to reshape services to match available revenue.
- The board directed staff to pursue revenue‑generation steps and to return with updates; Commissioner Regalado successfully moved for the mayor to advertise two RFPs: one for landfill gas (methane) conversion and one for revenue contracts relating to cardboard sales (these RFPs were later moved and approved separately on the agenda).

Ending/what to watch
The board approved a mail and TRIM notice showing a 1% proposed assessment; that notice will be mailed and the item will return for a public hearing and possible final vote. Commissioners signaled they expect additional data and concrete revenue proposals in committee before approving any higher number. The department and administration will present a more detailed budgetary and operational analysis at follow‑up briefings requested by the commission.","After hours of public comment and commissioner debate, Miami‑Dade County commissioners adopted a one‑percent increase to the county's non‑ad valorem solid‑waste assessment for 2025, capping a proposed two‑percent rise at 1% and approving mailed notice for TRIM. The vote was 8–4.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Miami‑Dade commission approves multiple first‑reading ordinances, RFPs for landfill gas and cardboard; appointments confirmed

Commissioners defer vote on American Dream Mall TIF measure; settlement of $5 million to be returned for review

Commissioners approve 1% solid‑waste assessment after lengthy debate over fees and revenue opportunities