ACLU attorney urges Centerville Council to protect tattooing under First Amendment rights

Centerville City Council is taking significant steps to address the constitutional implications of tattooing regulations in the community. During a recent meeting on July 1, 2025, the council heard from Abby, a staff attorney with the ACLU of Utah, who emphasized the importance of protecting First Amendment rights related to tattooing. Abby expressed gratitude to the council for their thoughtful consideration of zoning code amendments that could impact tattoo businesses in Centerville.

Abby highlighted that both the art of tattooing and the practice itself are protected forms of free speech under the First Amendment. She urged the council to ensure that any restrictions on tattooing do not infringe upon these rights, regardless of public sentiment or financial concerns. "Public animosity or discomfort with certain forms of expression, including tattoos, is not a lawful basis for censorship," she stated, reinforcing the need for local laws to align with constitutional values.

The discussion also included comments from a resident, JT, who, although not a Centerville resident, voiced support for the continuation of tattoo businesses in the city. JT expressed concerns about the potential for discrimination against individuals with tattoos and emphasized the importance of inclusivity in the community.

The council acknowledged the ongoing efforts to establish appropriate zoning for body art, noting that they are one of the few cities actively addressing this issue. The planning commission has held multiple meetings to draft an ordinance, but public input has been limited. Council members reiterated their commitment to balancing community standards with constitutional protections as they move forward with the proposed amendments.

As Centerville navigates these complex issues, the council's decisions will play a crucial role in shaping the future of tattooing and artistic expression in the city, ensuring that the rights of all constituents are upheld.