Council debates tax abatement for Newark's Robert Treat Hotel amid employee concerns

The Newark Municipal Council held a regular meeting on July 2, 2025, where discussions centered around a proposed 30-year tax abatement for the Robert Treat Hotel, owned by Miles Burger. The meeting featured a range of speakers, including former employees and union representatives, who voiced strong opposition to the tax abatement.

The first speaker, Halif Muhammad, praised Burger for his contributions to the hotel and the community, highlighting his efforts to improve the hotel’s quality and his commitment to hiring minorities. Muhammad emphasized that many employees viewed their time at the Robert Treat as a stepping stone to better opportunities.

In contrast, Shane Mitchell, deputy political director for the Hotel and Gaming Trades Council, urged the council to reject the tax abatement. He argued that the hotel does not provide adequate community benefits, such as new housing or public recreation, and raised concerns about the treatment of workers, including reports of threats and poor working conditions. Mitchell stressed that taxpayer dollars should support projects that genuinely benefit the community.

David Capito, a former employee, echoed these sentiments, recounting his negative experiences at the hotel, including low wages and unsafe working conditions. He urged the council to consider the treatment of workers before granting tax benefits.

Josefina Mercedes and Margarita Denton, both residents and advocates for fair labor practices, also opposed the tax abatement, arguing that it would support poor working conditions and low pay. They called for the council to prioritize projects that uplift Newark residents.

The meeting included a heated exchange when Elijah Abdul Samad Morgano raised concerns about the hotel’s ownership and its implications for the community, leading to a call for decorum from the council.

Felicia Austin Singleton concluded the public comments by criticizing the hotel’s management and the proposed tax abatement, asserting that it would perpetuate unfair labor practices.

The council did not make a decision during the meeting, but the strong opposition from community members and former employees highlighted significant concerns regarding labor practices and the use of taxpayer funds. The council is expected to deliberate further on the matter in upcoming sessions.