A heated debate erupted during the San Francisco County government meeting as supervisors clashed over a controversial charter amendment aimed at police funding. Supervisor Asha Safai led the charge against what he termed a "cop tax scheme," expressing strong opposition to the amendment proposed by Supervisor Dorsey, which he believes undermines public safety by lacking a clear funding source.

Safai highlighted the urgency of the situation, citing a staggering $700 million budget deficit facing the city. He criticized the mayor's previous cuts to essential services, including childcare and food programs, arguing that the proposed amendment would pit police officers against other vital public safety roles, such as emergency responders and healthcare workers. "We need true public safety in San Francisco right now," he asserted, emphasizing the need for fiscal responsibility in the face of the city's financial crisis.

The meeting also saw support for Safai's stance from Mayor London Breed and fellow supervisors, who withdrew their backing for the amendment. Safai noted that nearly 8,000 emails from the public opposed the cop tax scheme, showcasing significant community engagement on the issue. He called for a collaborative approach to public safety funding, suggesting that existing tax revenues could be restructured rather than imposing new taxes.

In a counterpoint, Supervisor Dorsey defended his proposal, arguing that it would provide voters with the agency to decide on police funding. He acknowledged the competitive landscape for law enforcement recruitment but maintained that the amendment was a necessary step toward ensuring adequate police staffing.

As public comment opened, community members voiced their opinions, with some urging supervisors to prioritize a comprehensive approach to public safety that includes various support services. The meeting underscored the ongoing tension between fiscal constraints and the need for effective public safety measures in San Francisco, leaving the future of the charter amendment uncertain as discussions continue.