Pine Ridge development plans approved for 76 lots with strict environmental conditions

The Planning and Development Commission Board of Citrus County convened on July 3, 2025, to discuss several key agenda items related to local development projects, particularly focusing on a proposed residential development in the Pine Ridge area.

The meeting began with a presentation on a new development plan that includes a mix of lot sizes, ranging from one acre to five acres. The developer aims to maintain compatibility with existing homes in the area by adhering to Pine Ridge's established setbacks and impervious surface ratios. The plan proposes 76 one-acre lots, along with some larger parcels to accommodate varying buyer preferences. Additionally, the developer has suggested the possibility of gated access and private road maintenance, as Citrus County will not accept these roads at this time.

A significant point of discussion was the inclusion of a conservation easement, which was praised for its potential to protect open space within the development. The board noted that placing this easement on the plat would prevent future alterations, ensuring the area remains undisturbed. The developer has requested a five-year expiration for certain conditions, which is longer than the standard three years, reflecting the project's complexity and the need for careful planning.

Commission members raised questions regarding the number of parcels in Pine Ridge and the extent of current development. It was noted that thousands of lots exist in the area, with a considerable number still undeveloped. The board discussed the implications of golf course closures in the region, considering how these changes might affect property values and community appeal.

Further discussions included the necessity of sidewalks for pedestrian connectivity and the requirement for a turn lane at the main entrance of the new community. The board emphasized the importance of traffic analysis to determine if such infrastructure is warranted based on projected home occupancy.

Concerns were also raised about the buffer zones between community buildings and residential lots. While the land development code does not mandate a buffer for community structures, the board expressed willingness to consider additional conditions to enhance privacy and aesthetics for residents.

After addressing these topics, the commission took a brief recess before opening the floor to public comments, allowing community members to voice their opinions on the proposed development.

Overall, the meeting highlighted the board's commitment to balancing development with community needs, ensuring that new projects align with existing neighborhood characteristics while addressing infrastructure and environmental considerations. The next steps will involve further public input and detailed assessments of the proposed plans.