In a recent San Francisco County government meeting, community members voiced their concerns regarding the impact of supportive housing on local neighborhoods, highlighting a growing tension between residents and the city’s approach to homelessness. The discussions centered around the effectiveness of current policies and the need for enhanced security measures in areas housing vulnerable populations.

One speaker emphasized the need for stronger regulations and accountability from the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (HSH), arguing that without proper enforcement, initiatives aimed at improving safety and support for families would be ineffective. This sentiment was echoed by several residents who called for increased collaboration between government agencies and nonprofit organizations to address safety concerns in their neighborhoods.

Janae Jackson, CEO of HomeRise, defended the organization’s role in housing formerly homeless individuals, noting that they house 30% of this population in the city. She urged the city to focus on the small percentage of residents facing challenges that lead to negative impacts on the community, rather than resorting to increased security measures. Jackson stressed the importance of understanding the broader context of supportive housing and the need for solutions that address the root causes of issues rather than merely treating symptoms.

Other speakers raised concerns about the perceived negative behaviors associated with supportive housing facilities, particularly in areas like Sixth Street and the Tenderloin. They reported incidents of open drug use and criminal activities, which they believe are exacerbated by the concentration of supportive housing without adequate community support or resources. One resident pointed out that local businesses are suffering due to these issues, calling for a more balanced approach that considers the needs of both residents and the surrounding community.

The meeting also highlighted frustrations with the city’s decision-making process, with some residents feeling that their voices have been overlooked in the planning and implementation of supportive housing projects. They called for a more inclusive approach that takes into account the concerns of existing community members before establishing new facilities.

As the meeting concluded, it was clear that while supportive housing is seen as a necessary intervention for addressing homelessness, there is a pressing need for the city to reassess its strategies. Residents are calling for a more comprehensive approach that not only provides housing but also ensures the safety and well-being of the entire community. The discussions underscored the importance of collaboration and communication between city officials, service providers, and residents to create a more harmonious living environment for all.