Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

McLeod appeals alteration permit for Fifth Avenue project seeking settlement resolution

September 27, 2023 | San Francisco City, San Francisco County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

McLeod appeals alteration permit for Fifth Avenue project seeking settlement resolution
In the heart of San Francisco's bustling city hall, a tense atmosphere enveloped the room as the Board of Appeals convened to address a contentious property dispute. The case at hand involved Bruce and Deborah McLeod, who were appealing a permit granted to their neighbor, Frank Felizi, for significant alterations to his property at 14420 Fifth Avenue. The proposed changes included replacing an existing deck and adding a roof deck, which had raised concerns among the McLeods and other community members.

As the meeting progressed, the McLeods expressed frustration over procedural issues, claiming that the permit holder had submitted excessive documentation that complicated their response. Bruce McLeod, an attorney by profession, argued for the opportunity to submit a more comprehensive reply to the additional materials presented by Felizi. He also introduced a binding settlement offer, which he felt was crucial for resolving the dispute amicably. However, his request to distribute this document was denied due to a late submission.

Felizi's representative countered, emphasizing that the McLeods had previously failed to adhere to submission guidelines and that the additional pages were necessary for clarity. The board members, including President Zwick, reiterated the importance of following established procedures, noting that exhibits do not count towards page limits and that both parties had been given ample time to negotiate a settlement.

Commissioner Lundberg and others echoed the sentiment that strict adherence to deadlines is vital in maintaining order and fairness in the appeals process. They expressed disappointment that the opportunity for mediation had not been fully utilized, suggesting that the board would now need to make a decision based on the evidence presented.

As the discussion unfolded, it became clear that the board was prepared to hear the case in its entirety, allowing both sides to present their arguments and ensuring that community voices would be heard. The meeting concluded with a sense of anticipation, as the board prepared to deliberate on the matter, underscoring the ongoing challenges of urban development and neighborhood relations in San Francisco. The next hearing is scheduled for September 27, where the board hopes to reach a resolution that balances the interests of all parties involved.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal