The San Francisco County meeting held on July 4, 2025, featured a series of public comments primarily focused on the upcoming Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit scheduled for November. The discussions were marked by strong opposition from community members, particularly regarding the invitation of Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. to the event.

Megan Murphy, chairperson of the League of Filipino Students at San Francisco State University, opened the public comment session by denouncing both the resolution supporting APEC and the city's decision to host the summit. She expressed deep concern over the human rights violations occurring under Marcos's regime, citing recent killings of labor activists in the Philippines, including the murder of union leader Alex Dolorosa. Murphy emphasized that welcoming Marcos sends a troubling message of support for his government's actions against the Filipino people.

Rachel Lucero, a member of the Malaya Movement San Francisco, echoed these sentiments, warning that Marcos's presence at APEC would further threaten the livelihoods of Filipino workers and indigenous communities. She urged city officials to support the Philippine Human Rights Act, which seeks to limit U.S. military aid to the Philippines until accountability for human rights abuses is established.

Other speakers, including Nilo from Anak Bayan at City College, criticized the allocation of city funds towards the APEC summit, arguing that the $30 million budget could be better spent on social services for the city's residents. They highlighted the disconnect between the financial support for APEC and the pressing needs of the local community, particularly in addressing homelessness and police brutality.

Nicole Rivera, a barista from the Excelsior District, described APEC as a harmful entity that exacerbates issues like gentrification and worker exploitation. She called for a reallocation of funds towards housing and community resources instead of increasing police budgets.

The public comments continued with various speakers, including Alyssa from Gabriela Oakland, who stressed the need for city officials to reconsider their support for APEC, citing its detrimental impact on vulnerable populations. Claire, another community member, criticized the potential economic benefits of APEC, arguing that they would not translate into improved living conditions for workers.

As the meeting concluded, the chair acknowledged the diverse opinions expressed by the public, emphasizing the importance of respecting all viewpoints. The discussions highlighted significant community concerns regarding the implications of hosting APEC and the broader impact of government decisions on marginalized populations in San Francisco.